On Jul 8, 2008, at 8:16 PM, Chris Parrish wrote:
Since the all / find / require_all / inclusive attribute is both
required and boolean (yeah I know XOR's been mentioned but I'm not
going there), why not try to include that condition in the rest of
it somehow?
<r:if_content part="my part"> (notice that the name "part" is
singular)
<r:if_content any_part="my part, my other part">
<r:if_content all_parts="my part, my other part">
So in this example, you'd have 3 different possible attributes. Its
always easier to read one attribute name than to have to combine two
or three into a single meaning.
This stuff really is really motivating me to get my conditionals
extension back to life ;-)
-Chris
What do you do when more than one of those is used? I think it will
muddy the use cases.
I'm just going to work on any="true" and call it a day (I can always
tweak the code to do differently). This conversation was helpful.
Ultimately as long as its implemented in a way that makes sense and it
gets the necessary feature built I think it will be a success.
When it comes down to it I'm not on the core team so they'll decide.
But I wanted to get the community involved in the idea first before I
added it.
I certainly don't want to kill the conversation about this, but I want
to start adding it in.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
