Thank you very much, that clears it up.
Jan
john muhl scripsit dd. Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:25:32 -0600 (internet: @559)
>it means nothing for radiant so far as i can tell, or am i missing
>something? the admin interface's html is not important (to me at
>least) and you've always been able to build the front end of your site
>using any markup language you like.
>
>On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Jan M.J. Storms<j...@storms.org> wrote:
>> Taken from "An Unofficial Q&A about the Discontinuation of the XHTML2
>> WG" at <http://hsivonen.iki.fi/xhtml2-html5-q-and-a/>:
>>
>> "What’s the upgrade path from XHTML 1.x?
>> For the technical kind of XHTML 1.x—that is, XHTML served as application/
>> xhtml+xml—the upgrade path is to XHTML5. For the marketing kind of XHTML
>> 1.x—that is, XHTML served as text/html—the upgrade path is to HTML5.
>> Moreover, “HTML5” replaces “XHTML” (and “Ajax”!) as the coolest
>> marketing buzzword."
>>
>> I wonder what this means for Radiant CMS pages.
>>
>> Jan
_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
