It seems that tags uses a 'tags' table. I am using the tags extension (version 1.5), created by Benny Degezelle and Jim Gay. The version of taggable that I am trying to run alongside tags is version 1.2.1, created by you (Will). Both of these versions are the most recent available from github.
Maybe the tags extension that I am running is the incorrect one? It's this one: https://github.com/jomz/radiant-tags-extension There are various other tags extensions listed on github (though all the others seem to be qualified for a special application, such as navigation). Before I go messing around with the tags extension (which I will surely mess up even more), maybe this is simply a matter of getting the correct tags extension. (Maybe?) Ross On Mar 13, 6:51 am, William Ross <w...@spanner.org> wrote: > On 12 Mar 2011, at 22:18, rosslaird wrote: > > > I have the tags extension installed, and I want to try out taggable. > > But it seems that both use a table called "tags," and this causes the > > migration of taggable to halt. I suppose I will have to remove the > > tags extension to install taggable, but if there is another way to do > > this (so that I preserve both extensions) that would be preferable. > > Ideas and suggestions most welcome. > > I thought the tags extension used a 'meta_tags' table and MetaTag object? > They ought to be compatible in the sense that you can install one and then > the other without destructive side effects. > > You might even be able to run them side by side: taggable takes over the > keywords field where tags adds its own text-to-tags process. I wouldn't > recommend it, though: there are likely to be odd method-name clashes and some > admin UI collisions are likely. It will be hard to evaluate them, even if > they work. > > best, > > will