Hugh, You may want to update your documentation as well. Because on page 92 under the section for the IdenticalClients statement it says: “You can have any number of IdenticalClients lines”
-Neil -- Neil Johnson 319 384-0938 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: radiator <[email protected]> on behalf of Neil Johnson <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 12:21 PM To: Hugh Irvine <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [RADIATOR] [External] Re: Client definition stanza Additional data point, if I use IPv4 addresses it works fine. -Neil -- Neil Johnson 319 384-0938 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Neil Johnson <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 12:04 PM To: Hugh Irvine <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [External] Re: [RADIATOR] Client definition stanza Hugh, I changed the stanza as requested: <Client 172.24.144.0/24> IdenticalClients 172.24.145.0/24, fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6400::/64, fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6600::/64 Identifier LC_NET_Clients Secret <SECRET> DupInterval 0 </Client> Same results. Connections from fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6400::1a are reported as from an unknown client, but connections from fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6600::b work fine? From the log: Wed Feb 26 11:55:40 2020: NOTICE: Request from unknown client fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6400::1a: ignored Wed Feb 26 11:58:26 2020: AUTH: User lu_nmjoo SUCCESSFULLY authenticated to device fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6600::b () I am running version 4.22 -Neil -- Neil Johnson 319 384-0938 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Hugh Irvine <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 6:35 PM To: Neil Johnson <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [External] Re: [RADIATOR] Client definition stanza Hello Neil - IdenticalClients expects a list - in your case the last line has replaced the other lines. Try this: <Client 172.24.144.0/24> # LC Research Switches IdenticalClients 172.24.145.0/24, fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6600::/64, fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6400::/64 ….. regards Hugh On 26 Feb 2020, at 10:12, Johnson, Neil M <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Given the following stanza: <Client 172.24.144.0/24> IdenticalClients fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6400::/64 # LC Research Switches IdenticalClients 172.24.145.0/24 IdenticalClients fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6600::/64 # Identifier LC_NET_Clients Secret <SECRET> DupInterval 0 </Client> Why would connections from fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6400::1a be reported as from an unknown client, but connections from fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6600::b work fine? Thanks! -Neil -- Neil Johnson Network Architect The University of Iowa 319 384-0938 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ radiator mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator -- Hugh Irvine [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald, Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, Active Directory, EAP, TLS, TTLS, PEAP, TNC, WiMAX, RSA, Vasco, Yubikey, MOTP, HOTP, TOTP, DIAMETER, SIM, etc. Full source on Unix, Linux, Windows, macOS, Solaris, VMS, NetWare etc.
_______________________________________________ radiator mailing list [email protected] https://lists.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator
