http://www.livingston.com/tech/archive/portmaster-users/9802/0511.html
-- 
                       Shori Pty Ltd                              /
Barry W Anderson                                   \             / /
Senior Consultant                                   \\\' ,      / //
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                        \\\//,   _/ //,
                                                      \_-//' /  //<,
                       http://www.shori.com            \ ///  <//`
                                                       /  >>   \\\`__/_
42 Munich Drive                                       /,)-^>>  _\` \\\
Keilor Downs, Victoria                                (/   \\ / \\\
Australia 3038                                              //  //\\\
----------------------------------------------------------((`-((`-----
Title: portmaster-users.9802: (PM) Re: (RADIUS) ComOS/Radius bug in accouting? (fwd)

(PM) Re: (RADIUS) ComOS/Radius bug in accouting? (fwd)

MegaZone ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sun, 8 Feb 1998 22:11:01 -0800 (PST)

Sorry, my goof - this should have gone to portmaster-radius, please
followup there if you want.

Once upon a time MegaZone shaped the electrons to say...
>Once upon a time Dwayne Kuykendall shaped the electrons to say...
>>I understand your argument that RADIUS alone should not be used for
>>resource control. We have been using a hack to prevent this for some time,
>>and it simply does not work. This IS due to lost STOP records.
>
>Even without any packets being lost, the protocol itself contains inherent
[snip]

-MZ

--
Lucent Remote Access Division - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For support requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
-
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.



Reply via email to