Hello everyone -
We have been talking about this just recently as it happens. Unfortunately the
decision was to leave it as it is for the moment. The same decision was reached
for support of different dictionary files in Client clauses as well.
We would be interested though in compiling a list of requested features so as
to enable some resource allocation planning over the coming months.
So please send me your wish lists and we'll see what we can do.
thanks
Hugh
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, David Lloyd wrote:
> Or here's a thought: How about custom trace levels, where you pick &
> choose what you want output?
>
> Just a thought, anyways...
>
> On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Since we are on the topic, how about this feature request...
> >
> >I would love to be able to set the trace level differently for each
> ><realm> or <handler> clause.
> >
> >Why? Well I might be happy with a level 2 or 3 trace from my
> >operational realms, but I may need a more detailed trace from a new
> >realm that has just been setup or one which is having problems.
> >
> >Setting a global trace level gives me way more irrelevant data than I
> >want because it dumps details for every realm instead of just those I
> >am testing / having trouble with.
> >
> >Possible?
>
--
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, etc etc on Unix, Win95/8,
NT, Rhapsody
===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
