Yes, I think this is a reasonable thing to do.
Look for it in a forthcoming release.
Cheers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open System Consultants +61 3 9598 0985
Mike is travelling right now, and there may be delays
in our correspondence.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, October 29, 1999 5:40 AM
Subject: (RADIATOR) LDAP Request
>
>Would it be possible to modify the AuthLDAP modules so that instead
>of (or in addition to to maintain backward compatibility) having
>a single attribute that holds all of the reply items we can instead
>set things up more like the SQL modules?
>
>What I mean is under SQL you can do things like:
>
> AuthColumnDef 2, Session-Timeout, reply
>
>saying that the column 2 attribute is a reply item and should be
>combined with 'Session-Timeout' to create 'Session-Timeout = X'.
>
>Under LDAP the same thing could apply:
>
> LDAPAttribute, netmask, Framed-IP-Netmask, reply
>
>stating that there is an LDAP attribute called 'netmask' which should
>be used as the value for the reply string 'Framed-IP-Netmask'.
>
>That'd make things so much cleaner in my LDAP databases.... ditto with
>check items :)
>
>-Steve
>
>
>===
>Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
>To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
>'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
>
===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
