Mike McCauley wrote:
> > What do You think about config-wide user-defined variables? It would be just
> >fine if the Radiator has it :)
>
> An interesting thought: do you mean a % variable that you can use like %n or %M
> etc, but whose value you can set up yourself?
Yes, something like that. Comparison expressions would be fine also (I mean,
<Handler Called-Station-Id >= 80, Called Station-Id <= 89> for example - it is
much easier and convenient than perl regexps, in my opinion).
Also, don't you thinks that all the handlers suitable for the current session
should be processed? I mean, if current packet has both "Acct-Status-Type=Stop"
and "Class = someclass", and there is two handlers - one for each of above, both
those handlers should be processed in order they appear in radius.conf?
> Hmmm, we havent seen that one before. Sounds like it would need a new AuthBy
> module. They are quite easy to build: you usually only have to implemenet one
> function.
O'k, I'll think it over. Later :)
By now I "composed" a little bit complicated SQL clause which implements all the
checking - by user, by realm and by group, and chooses apropriate attributes for
each user.
> > Oops... Sorry - I didn't notice that. There must be something wrong with my
> >"Netscape Messenger" at my office...
>
> Alas, its still happening.
Oops... You must be joking? I can see my message came back in maillist and it is
in plain text. If you mean this line below the message and above the signature -
it is just a "_" symbols :)
--
________________________________________________________
Regards, Dmitry Niqiforoff [tel. +7 8462 427427]
Kraft-S, JSC.
Samara, Russia
===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
