El 3 May 2001, a las 11:07, Hugh Irvine escribi�:
>
> Hello Mariano -
>
> On Thursday 03 May 2001 06:15, Mariano Absatz wrote:
> > Hi... on my delayed reading of the list I found this:
> >
> > El 18 Apr 2001, a las 9:45, Hugh Irvine escribi�:
> > > Hello Andy -
> > >
> > > The session database will be accessed by both authentication (to delete
> > > and to check limits) and accounting (to insert and delete).
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > So... I have different instances of Radiator for accounting and
> > authentication, then BOTH have to have the <SessionDatabase> clause? And
> > should they be identical?
> >
>
> Yes. This is the same situation as having multiple machines running Radiator
> - they all need to share the same session database (if coherency among them
> is an issue).
OK... I'll put this in my include file, then...
>
<SNIP>
>
> BTW - I think the next major release of Radiator will be Radiator-3.0, which
> will include support for the next generation "Diameter" protocol.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/aaa-charter.html
Good... I've been reading the diameter i-d's... it's kind of a little
beast, it would be nice if you could configure Radiator 3.0 (please,
don't call it Diameterator :-D ) without the diameter support, since I
guess it will add really lots of code and (yet) I don't see a lot of
market pressure (here in Argentina, at least) for most of it's features...
===
Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
