"Wed Jun 26 16:03:16 2002: INFO: Duplicate request id 87
received from 10.52.0.1(1026): ignored"This message was logged for an Accounting request that was clearly retransmitted since it had a large Acct-Delay-Time value. But if Radiator keeps ignoring the request, the NAS will keep retransmitting, and the circle of life will go on and on and on... Does the RFC say to ignore dups? Wouldn't it make more sense to Reject them somehow? Or, if the original one was already processed successfully, it could simply send back an Accept and then discard it as a dup? Dave === Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/ Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
