Thanks Heikki, I'll try this.
Regards, Ronald On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Heikki Vatiainen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/04/2012 12:36 PM, Ronald Pérez wrote: > > > Thu Oct 4 08:34:55 2012 586182: WARNING: Bad authenticator received in > > reply to ID 21. Reply is ignored > > > > > > The communication scheme is like this: > > > > *Radius1 Radius2* > > * ------->Request* > > * Reply<---------* > > * > > * > > *Radius1 Log: Bad Authenticator received in reply........ * > > > > > > I've been doing some search, lot of people said that this problem is > > related to misconfigured shared secret, in this case that is not the > > problem because both are radius control by us and shared secrets are the > > same. Also there is a recommendation to configure "IgnoreAcctSignature", > > but before configure this i want to know why is this happening. > > If you know both RADIUS servers are known to generate correct > signatures, then you should check the configuration to make sure there > are no invisible characters in the secrets. > > Since you are having problems with replies, you should use > IgnoreReplySignature if you need to set an option to handle the problem. > > Thanks, > Heikki > > > -- > Heikki Vatiainen <[email protected]> > > Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server > anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald, > Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, Active Directory, EAP, TLS, > TTLS, PEAP, TNC, WiMAX, RSA, Vasco, Yubikey, MOTP, HOTP, TOTP, > DIAMETER etc. Full source on Unix, Windows, MacOSX, Solaris, VMS, > NetWare etc. > _______________________________________________ > radiator mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator >
_______________________________________________ radiator mailing list [email protected] http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator
