Soccer vs. American Sports
 
The question in the article reproduced below, "How can the most popular  
sport in the world 
be so insignificant and secondary in the United States?" is asked by many  
people these days. 
However,  it is the wrong question. Soccer, while it has the sort of  
appeal that gymnastics does, 
sheer athleticism and a sort of gracefulness in action,  has major  
drawbacks.
 
Chief among them is low scoring, with 1-0 and 2-1 games the norm, not the  
exception, 
a factor that strikes Americans as ludicrous, as if a huge  factory  only 
produced
one or two Chevrolets per day. But there is one other structural deficiency 
 of soccer.
Ball control is the worst of any major sport you can name. That is,  
"possession" of the ball
is almost a joke. No wonder that there are so few points scored. Compared  
with hands, 
feet simply cannot direct a ball as well. Therefore the game is  terribly 
imprecise, 
with loss of control VERY common. Indeed, maybe 2/3rds of every game
features no team in control of the ball. At least not in control for more  
than
10 or 15 seconds.
 
Americans value control and precision not only in sports, but  also in 
industry 
and the much else in life. And just what is wrong with such values ? 
Answer, nothing is wrong , the opposite is the case.
 
Not that, for a man, women's soccer doesn't have a certain appeal. But not  
so much
because of the game, because it is an opportunity to see young women run to 
 and fro
with much vigor and animation.
 
For the men's game, to repeat the point, if you like gymnastics then soccer 
 has a sort of
fascination of its own, even if, compared to baseball or real  football, 
etc, even compared
to track and field events, it just doesn't have an "electricity"  factor. 
Think of soccer as
ballet for men who are jocks, serious machismo types, rough hombres, and  
all of that,
but ballet nonetheless.
 
Soccer compares with another sport that has almost no following in the USA, 
 bull fighting.
Almost no Americans see the point of it. Yes, a matador looks great,   and 
yes it is dangerous
and requires real courage, but it is what it is, a form of dance.
 
America sports are about points scored, and, with exceptions, the more  
points, the better.
Points measure success, points measure achievement. Valuing points is akin  
to valuing
mathematics or science.
 
Yes, there can be defensive struggles, some of which are extremely  
exciting, but always
against a backdrop of potential for a lot of points at almost any  time.
 
Baseball, 0 - 0 in the bottom of the 9th. Bases loaded and a batter hits  
one out of the park.
Suddenly the score in 4 - 0.  For that matter a scoreless game could  see 
the visiting team
score 7 runs in the top of the 9th, followed by an 8 run rally in the  
bottom of the inning.
 
Football games can be blown open in the 4th quarter after being close for  
the first
3 quarters, with a final score of 44-21, where it had been 23-21 at the end 
 of the
3rd quarter. And basketball games are typically in the 80 - 70 range.
 
And there are many ways to score, vs soccer, where, essentially, there is  
only one.
Different ways to score reflects ingenuity and the value in accomplishment  
via
alternative pathways when other avenues are closed.
 
Even hockey , which can be more-or-less compared to soccer, while there are 
no such things as high baseball scores, regardless often enough has final  
tallies 
in the 3-2 or 4-3 range, with an occasional 5-1. Plus hockey has its own 
kind of variety, since a team may have one or two players in the penalty  
box 
or emotions may boil over and, as the joke has it, "I went to the  fights
last night and a hockey game broke out."  Plus hockey is extremely  fast,
with skaters zooming along as fast as horses can run at Churchill  Downs.
And Americans also value speed.
 
In other words, the Right Question to Ask is this  :
What hasn't the rest of the world followed America's lead  in sports 
preferences ?
 
And there is another question, besides, why does the rest of the world  
think soccer

is a superior sport ?  It isn't, it is an OK sport, but that is the  best 
anyone can say objectively.
 
The attitude of soccer fans is also a consideration. Although American fans 
 can be
very unruly following championships, and go on rampages in the streets, 
after all other games people simply leave the stadium and go home or visit  
a local bar.
That's it, no reason to take matters further, it would be foolish to do  so.
 
Not how many soccer fans think, rather for them it makes really good sense  
to riot,
injure people, and maybe even cause such mayhem that people get killed.  
Which,
objectively, is insane.
 
Then there is the Olympic Committee. Recently, after a trial period,  
baseball and softball
were dropped as Olympic sports. Why ?  Because many non-American  sports 
enthusiasts
are sports bigots. There is no other word for it, they are prejudiced,  
biased, and 
stridently anti-American the way that other people ( in cases the same  
people )
are anti-Semitic.
 
About baseball and its close cousin, softball, these sports are played in  
Japan, Taiwan,
Korea, the Philippines, all of Latin America , plus Canada and, at a  minor 
league level, Israel.
Yet the relevant Olympic committee saw fit the drop the sport  -while  
retaining such 
non-sports as gymnastics with colored cloth twirling,  and  synchronized 
swimming.
Neither of which, by any reasonable definition, are actual sports.
 
That is, Europeans don't get it. No problem with their enjoyment of  ballet.
As a Classical music buff, some days I can't get enough Delibes or  
Stravinsky.
But ballet is not a sport. Nor, really, are equestrian events. Chariot  
racing
Ben Hur style, with contestants trying to knock others out of their  
chariots
as they race might  qualify, and you can make a case for polo ( which  also
is quite exciting ), but otherwise equestrian events are not sports.
They are well worth fan support, but they are as out of place as
holding ( human )  track events at the Kentucky Derby. 
 
Soccer is gradually finding a place in sports in the United States. It is  
doing so
despite a major difficulty. All US sports are seasonal. Where do you place  
soccer
in the schedule ? Baseball = Summer. Football = Autumn  Hockey =  Winter
Basketball = Spring.  Wherever anyone tries to insert soccer there  is
enormous competition from other sports.
 
Yet, Americans are trying. Some day there will assuredly be a niche for  
soccer.
It is the American way to be as inclusive as possible. And the American way 
 to try
and master every sport, hence US ( near )dominance at most Olympic  Games.
And Team USA showed it can play soccer at World Cup levels
 
Unfortunately much of the rest of the world has a long way to go to rival  
the United States
in many, many categories of life. But it can be done. USA basketball  
remains superior
but the difference between the best American teams and the best teams of  
Latin America or 
Europe are less and less each year. Even baseball now has a youthful  
following in Iraq.
 
About sports, it isn't that Americans are mostly unenthusiastic about  
soccer, the
problem is the lack of appreciation of a large portion of the  world, 
especially the 
European snobocracy, with American sports values.
 
No-one needs Euro-centric sports bigotry, either, which is what many soccer 
 people
are actually all about, beneath the surface.
 
The rest of the world needs to get in step with America. Not the other way  
around.
 
Billy Rojas
 
==========================================================
 



World Cup dreaming
Although soccer is the most popular sport around the world, in  the U.S. 
it's far down the list. But our population is changing, and our view of  
ourselves may also change.

 
By Ariel Dorfman 
LATimes
July 4, 2010 

How can the most popular sport in the world be so insignificant and  
secondary in the United States?

It is a bizarre phenomenon that, due to  personal reasons, has particularly 
disconcerted me over the years, as my  addiction to soccer is inextricably 
linked to U.S. history. Indeed, I became  entranced by the game thanks to 
Sen. Joseph McCarthy and his anti-communist  witch hunt. Had he not persecuted 
my left-wing dad, an Argentine functionary at  the United Nations, and 
forced our family to flee New York for Chile in 1954, I  would probably still 
prefer today the sports I practiced during my 10 childhood  years as a Yank: 
baseball, basketball, American football. Instead, I was given  the chance to 
fall in love with the Spanish language, with the Chilean  revolution, with 
one woman in particular and, of course, with "el  fútbol."

As I awkwardly tried, at the age of 12, to compete on the  fields of 
Santiago with classmates who had been playing since they were babes, I  can 
remember resenting the utter absence of the game at my schools in New York.  
That 
will change, I told myself, that must change someday. Americans, with their  
prowess in so many other athletic endeavors, cannot forever turn their back 
on  something so precise and unpredictable, such a gloriously fierce ballet 
of  bodies.

So it was encouraging to find a less dismal situation when, the victim  of 
a new exile — this time from Chile — I settled back in the States in the  
1980s. Professional soccer, enhanced by Pele's participation in New York's  
Cosmos club in 1977, had raised the sport's profile, while millions of  
youngsters across the land, both male and female, were now playing the game. 
For  
two seasons I even coached the junior soccer team of my youngest son, 
Joaquín —  in Durham, N.C., of all places! And then the U.S. women won the 
World  
Championship in 1991, and in 1994 the men's World Cup was held in nine 
fervent  U.S. cities. By 2002 the Yankee team had advanced to the quarter 
finals 
and  hopes kept rising that soon soccer would be as ubiquitous here as it 
was  globally. That illusion — bolstered in the current World Cup by Landon 
Donovan's  last-minute "miracle" goal against Algeria — quickly dissipated. 
After losing to  Ghana in overtime in the next match, the Americans headed 
home, leaving in their  wake the same desolate question about the irrelevance 
of soccer in the United  States that haunted me over half a century ago.

Many reasons have  conspired, I believe, to create this bleak state of 
affairs. Americans have  perennially seen themselves as pioneers, constantly 
reinventing themselves.  Their most popular sports have appropriated 
traditional games and drastically  modified the rules: Cricket became baseball, 
rugby 
turned into American  football, and even basketball can be considered a 
variation on indigenous native  American activities. But how do you take the 
"foreign" game of soccer and make  it into something other than ... well, 
soccer?

The predominance and head  start of those more "American" games has not 
allowed soccer the space to develop  at the collegiate and professional level 
and, perhaps most crucially, is not  massively dreamed of as a path to 
grandeur by athletically endowed children  mired in poverty. American kids have 
the same talent as youngsters in the  favelas of Rio or the shantytowns of 
Nigeria, but it is siphoned off at  an early age in search of more lucrative 
venues.

Nor do children in the  United States get to watch much soccer on 
television. This last point may be an  insoluble problem for the sport's 
advancement 
because it concerns the structure  of the game itself. Major U.S. sports 
events have timeouts and interludes during  which ads can be breathlessly 
crammed in, but one of the essential attractions  of soccer is the dramatic 
relentlessness of the contest once it has begun. You  literally cannot stop the 
clock. This is such a sacred rule of the game that its  organizers have 
resisted the clamor to allow video replays, even when the  referee has made a 
flagrantly erroneous call that can cost a team  victory.

Do all these circumstances mean that soccer in the U.S. is  doomed to a 
minor status forever? There are several reasons for tentative  optimism. The 
first is that the United States, despite the increasing stridency  of its 
anti-immigrant nativists, continues to import millions of citizens from  the 
rest of the world. These men and women and children smuggle their love for  
soccer across the border along with their frequently illegal bodies.

The  second reason is that we are living a moment in history when the very 
notion of  American exceptionalism is under siege. If the United States were 
indeed to  abandon the idea that it has been chosen by God to save the 
world, if its  citizens were to really entertain the notion that they are just 
the same as  humans all over the globe and not uniquely endowed with shining 
virtue, could  they not someday join the rest of the species in celebrating 
the most beautiful  sport of our time? Would it then be inconceivable that a 
few decades from now  the U.S. could win the World Cup?

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to