Real Clear World
Democracies Have Bankrupted  Themselves
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
 
The disintegration of the welfare  state 
 
‘Italy’s public finances are a time  bomb waiting to explode’
 
_Neil Reynolds_ 
(http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/commentary/neil-reynolds/)   
Globe and Mail  /  Published on Monday, July 12, 2010 
 
Democracies produced Nazi Germany and  Fascist Italy, fulfilling the 
expectation of Socrates and Machiavelli that  democracies end in tyranny. Now 
democracies are fulfilling the complementary  expectation of Nobel laureate 
economist Milton Friedman that democracies end in  bankruptcy. Put a democracy 
in charge of the Sahara, Mr. Friedman once said, and  sand itself will become 
scarce. Democracies are indeed profligate trustees – or  have been for the 
past 30 or 40 years. Mr. Friedman’s primary fret, though, was  the tendency 
of democracy to centralize political and economic power in the same  hands. 
Most critiques of democracy reflect this elemental distrust. “Democracy  is 
two wolves and a lamb,” Benjamin Franklin reputedly said, “voting on what 
to  have for lunch.”  
Democratic self-deprecation isn’t quite as funny as it once was. Mobs have  
already taken to the venerable, iconic streets of European states, notably 
among  them Greece, birthplace of Athenian democracy. It’s apparently easier 
to give  wealth away than it is to take it back. Democracy assembled the 
welfare state  peaceably enough. Can democracy dismantle it as peaceably? No, 
it can’t. The  mobs are not finished. 
In a disturbing analysis titled Democracy, Debt and Disorder,  
prophetically published early in 2008, two Italian economists assert that  
Italian 
governments have accumulated so much debt that it’s essentially  impossible to 
avert the disintegration of the country’s social contract.  Giuseppe Eusepi 
and Luisa Giuriato, of Sapienza University in Rome, do not  specify violent 
insurrection as a consequence. They do specify an end to Italy’s  welfare stat
e – and to the “disorder” that will arise when government divides  the 
spoils. 
Profs. Eusepi and Giuriato studied Italy’s history of public debt across 
150  years – since the country became a unified state in 1861. They found that 
 successive governments commonly resorted to significant debt but that they 
never  came close to the country’s current dependency on debt, year after 
year, to fund  current expenditures. 
In 1861, for example, Italy’s public debt stood at 35.8 per cent of GDP. At 
 the end of the Second World War, it stood at 40 per cent. In 1970, it was 
at 50  per cent. Italy’s debt now stands at 120 per cent of GDP, equivalent 
to Greece’s  debt. The country must soon choose between its welfare 
commitments and its  interest payments. The two professors say it can’t afford 
both. 
At the end of the First World War, Italy’s debt hit 160 per cent of GDP – 
an  extraordinary indebtedness. Ironically, it was the Fascists, who seized 
power in  1922, who dealt with it. Profs. Eusepi and Giuriato credit the 
country’s first  Fascist finance minister for cutting government expenditures 
in half in six  years and for reducing public debt to 50 per cent of GDP. “
The idea of [extreme]  deficit and debt accumulation,” they say, “was simply 
culturally unacceptable at  the time.” 
This is an intriguing observation, suggesting that the accumulation of debt 
 in affluent democracies reflects a cultural adaptation – in which public 
debt  funds la dolce vita – as much as it reflects political ideology or 
novel  economic theory. Beginning in the late 1960s and early 1970s, 
governments 
 abandoned the old virtues. Profs. Eusepi and Giuriato describe the fiscal  
excesses that followed as “a public indebtedness saturnalia.” 
Nevertheless, the professors blame Keynesian theory, too: “The adoption of  
Keynesian analysis provided politicians with a rationale for borrowing 
money to  buy votes.” In 1961, public spending took 27.6 per cent of GDP. In 
1971, it took  34.8 per cent and, in 1994, 121.1 per cent. The irony, the 
economists say, is  that Italians could have afforded all of the largesse that 
flowed to them from  the state – if only they had paid for them. 
In fact, though, much of Italy’s debt purchased benefits that weren’t  
necessary. It paid for early retirement of public-sector workers, for example,  
and provided these pensioners with incomes much higher than private-sector  
workers. Now, with revenues falling and costs rising, Italy can avert 
insolvency  only by adopting a constitutional prohibition of deficits, the 
economists say.  This stringent assignment is Mission: Impossible. 
Incidentally, Capital Economics – the international consultancy company –  
said in a research note last week that Italy will find it hard to avert  
bankruptcy. “Italy’s public finances are a time bomb waiting to explode,” the 
 company said. “We believe that it might take a decade or more of falling 
wages  for Italy to restore its full competitiveness.” 
Democracies have made people more dependent on the state than any  
humanitarian necessity required. For Italy, and for other democracies, the 
worst  is 
surely yet to come. Already, hundreds of thousands of middle-class people  
have thronged the streets of Paris and Rome, of Milan and Sarajevo, of 
Reykjavik  and Bucharest (where demonstrators stormed the presidential palace, 
an 
insurgent  act that evokes the spectre of revolution). The World Socialists’
 website  proclaims an age of rage ahead – and chillingly quotes British 
historian Simon  Schama: “You can smell the sulphur in the air.”

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to