Real Clear Politics
 
July 14, 2010  
Dems' Lament: It Wasn't Supposed to Be Like  This
By _Jonah  Goldberg_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?author=Jonah+Goldberg&id=14438) 

It wasn't supposed to be like this. 
The Obama administration came into power with the political winds at its  
back, the media at its feet and Americans open to major change. The White 
House  even had a slogan: A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.

 
The logic behind the axiom is unassailable. As Robert Higgs documented in 
his  libertarian classic, "Crisis and Leviathan," it's crisis -- not merely 
war --  that is the health of the state. Crises melt frozen politics. They 
create  opportunities. They give the government room to maneuver and grow. 
And for a while, it worked that way. Democrats steamrolled the most  
ambitiously liberal agenda in at least a generation. Yet liberals are 
miserable.  
Their lamentations over what they see as President Obama's lack of audacity  
punctuate the din, like ululating matrons at an Arab politician's funeral. 
This misplaced griping stems not from Obama's failure to "think big" but 
from  a misreading of the political climate: Liberals thought they'd be 
popular. 
The American people supported the New Deal and pro-FDR politicians for 
years.  This time around, Americans aren't turning to government. Rather, 
they've grown  only more disgusted with the public sector. Trust in government 
is 
near its  historic low. Obama's support among self-identified independents 
is at an  all-time low and doesn't appear to have hit bottom yet, while the 
"intensity"  among Republican voters continues to surge. 
Indeed, conservatives outnumber liberals by more than 2 to 1 (42 percent to 
 20 percent), according to Gallup. If that trend continues just a bit more, 
an  absolute majority of Americans may soon call themselves conservatives. 
All those liberal pundits who prophesized an Obama-led "new New Deal" must  
feel foolish as they don their life preservers and head to higher ground in 
 anticipation of the electoral tsunami heading their way in November. 
In a futile effort to build the morale of the sandbag brigades preparing 
for  the tide, the White House and Democrats have interrupted their "recovery 
summer"  cheerleading and started making the case that the coming election 
is a "choice,"  not a "referendum." It's "a choice between the policies that 
led us into this  mess or the policies that are leading us out of this 
mess," Obama thundered in  Missouri last week. 
Obviously, such arguments hinge on the hope that the people will agree. 
That  seems doubtful. Indeed, if that reasoning were persuasive, ObamaCare 
would be  popular -- or at least it would have become popular since its 
passage, 
as the  White House predicted. 
Perhaps voters don't remember the Bush years as a time of "market  
fundamentalism" so much as a time when "big government" conservatism in the  
White 
House and cronyism in Congress set the kindling for the bonfire Obama  
ignited. 
However much blame they deserve for the economic crisis, Obama and  
congressional Democrats deserve the political crisis they've created  for 
themselves. And the GOP should exploit it. 
For a year or so, Republicans have been the so-called party of no. Contrary 
 to the expectations of its critics, that tactic has been good for the GOP. 
It  seems that the "tea parties," America's natural antibodies to Obamaism, 
have  provided some vital stem-cell therapy -- helping to regrow the 
Republican  spine. 
But that spine is only valuable if you use it for something. Much of the 
GOP  leadership has been content saying "no" for two reasons -- one good, one 
bad.  When Obama was tall in the saddle and determined to exploit the 
economic crisis  on his terms, there was no point in offering real 
alternatives. 
It's just a lot  easier to criticize than it is to lead. 
Now is the time for the GOP to call Obama's bluff and offer a real choice. 
My  personal preference would be for the leadership to embrace Wisconsin 
Rep. Paul  Ryan's "road map," a sweeping, bold and humane assault on the 
welfare state and  our debt crisis. Doing so might come at the cost of trimming 
the GOP's victory  margins in November, but it would provide Republicans with 
a real mandate to be  something more than "not-Obama." 
Don't let Obama's crisis go to waste. 

 
© 2010 Tribune Media Services, Inc.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to