_Return  to the Article_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/08/05/illogical_immigration_106623.html)
 

August 5, 2010  
Illogical Immigration
By _Victor  Davis Hanson_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?author=Victor+Davis+Hanson&id=14423) 

Some 11 million to 15 million illegal aliens are now residing in America,  
most after crossing into America unlawfully. Once a federal law is 
arbitrarily  not enforced, all sorts of bizarre paradoxes arise from that 
original  co
ntradiction. As proof, examine the following illogical policies and  
contradictions involving illegal immigration. 
Take, for example, profiling -- the controversial questioning of those who  
appear likely to be illegal aliens. Apparently, American border guards have 
 developed criteria for profiling those deemed likely to be unlawful 
aliens.  Otherwise, how would they have arrested and deported hundreds of 
thousands in  2009? 
 




     
Receive news  alertsSign Up  

Victor Davis Hanson RealClearPolitics  immigration


Yet apparently, at some arbitrary point distant from the border, those who  
cross illegally are not supposed to be asked about their immigration 
status. OK,  but exactly why did procedures so radically change at, say, five, 
10, 
20, or is  it 100 miles from the border? A border patrolman often profiles, 
but a nearby  highway patrolman cannot? 
The federal government is suing Arizona for the state's efforts to enforce  
the federal immigration law. The lawsuit alleges that Arizona is too 
zealous  both in enforcing immigration law and encroaching on federal 
jurisdiction. 
But wait -- for years, several American cities have declared themselves  
sanctuary cities. City officials have even bragged that they would not allow  
their municipalities to enforce federal immigration statutes. So why does  
Washington sue a state that seeks to enhance federal immigration laws and yet 
 ignore cities that blatantly try to erode them? 
Something is going very wrong in Mexico to prompt more than half a million 
of  its citizens to cross the border illegally each year. Impoverished 
Mexican  nationals variously cite poor economic conditions back home, 
government  
corruption, a lack of social services, and racism. In other words, it is 
not  just the desirability of America but also the perceived undesirability of 
Mexico  that explains one of largest mass exoduses in modern history. 
But why, then, would Mexican President Felipe Calderon, whose country's  
conditions are forcing out its own citizens, criticize the United States, 
which  is receiving so many of them? And why, for that matter, would many of 
those  illegal immigrants identify, if only symbolically, with the country that 
made  them leave, whether by waving its flag or criticizing the attitudes 
of the  Americans who took them in? 
And how does Mexico treat the hundreds of thousands of aliens who seek to  
illegally cross its own southern border with Central America each year? Does 
 Mexico believe in sovereign borders to its south but not to its north? 
Is Mexico more or less humane to illegal aliens than the country it so 
often  faults? Why, exactly, does Mexico believe that nearly a million of its 
own  nationals annually have claims on American residency, when Chinese, 
Indian,  European and African would-be immigrants are deemed not to? Is the 
reason  proximity? Past history? 
Proponents of open borders have organized May Day rallies, staged boycotts 
of  Arizona, sued in federal and state courts, and sought to portray those 
who want  to enforce existing federal immigration law as racially 
insensitive. But about  70 percent of Americans support securing our borders, 
and 
support the Arizona  law in particular. Are a clear majority of Americans 
racist, 
brainwashed or  deluded in believing that their laws should be enforced? 
And if so, why would  immigrants wish to join them? 
It is considered liberal to support open borders and reactionary to want to 
 close them. But illegal immigr

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to