( Written in the aftermath of Ft Hood )
 
American Thinker
 
November 12, 2009  
It Isn't Political Correctness; It's Shariah
By _Pamela Geller_ (http://www.americanthinker.com/pamela_geller/) 


In surveying the cultural carnage in the wake of the _worst terrorist 
attack on a  military installation_ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/fort-hood-jihad/)  in U.S. 
history, it bears noting that there have been 
seismic shifts in America. When America was free of the  shackles of Islam, 
say, fifty years ago, the current response to such an attack  by an enemy 
faction would have been unthinkable. 

I have  watched in abject horror the elites' stunning reaction to this act 
of war. The  denial, the submission, the excuses, the dodging, the 
self-flagellation, the  shame -- the deceiving of the American people by the 
media, 
the military,  society, law enforcement, authorities and politicians, all the 
way up to and  including the White House -- amounts to the enforcement of 
Shariah law. 

Shariah law forbids criticism of Islam. And here we  are.

We are witnessing an Islamized America. This is well  beyond political 
correctness. We are enforcing Shariah  law. We will not insult Islam -- that is 
Shariah law. We self-censor -- that is  Shariah law. We disrespect ourselves 
and our nation so that we might respect  Islam. This is dhimmitude. We 
should be raging; we should be outraged. We should  be strategizing for this 
worldwide conflict. We should be debating about which  leader will best handle 
Islam's war on the West. And yet we have not one leader  who begins to 
understand the conflict -- that's how feared the subject matter  is. Not one 
leader. 

Recently there was an interesting debate at National Review  Online between 
squishy conservatives who soft-pedal Islam and those who stand  for the 
reality of Islamic doctrine, conservative principles, and the essential  truth. 
By and large, the conservatives have dropped the ball on Islamic jihad.  
This has been made painfully clear by the lack of a leader on the right who  
speaks to and takes up the fight against the sweeping Islamization of 
America.  America has no Geert Wilders.

The conservatives are not really as bad as the Left on Islam,  but they get 
real only when there is jihadi "intervention" that invades and  destroys 
the delusion of their narrative. 

It is interesting to me that the hierarchy of the conservative  movement 
(take CPAC, for example) stays far away from the counter-jihad forces  (i.e., 
Robert Spencer, Andrew Bostom, myself) except at moments like these. Last  
year there was not one speaker, not one event at CPAC that spoke to the 
greatest  threat this nation faces -- which is why I staged the _Geert Wilders 
event at the  Omni Hotel during CPAC_ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/03/we-turned-a-corner-friday-night-something-really-big-happene
d-something-historic-in-the-face-of-a-complacent-lethargic-co.html)  (but 
not affiliated with CPAC) last year. 

When the reality of war, Islamic doctrine, and bloodshed lays  bare the 
nature of the enemy and the battle we are in, the door creaks open.  Robert 
Spencer starts getting invitations to radio shows, and NRO finally runs  pieces 
by Bostom and Spencer that show up the soft conservative narrative on  
Islam, which is soft and fuzzy and stupid (i.e., "Islamist" vs. "Islamic"). Of  
course, we bad boys will be put back in our boxes until the next terrible 
time  the jihad comes calling. 

It pains me to say it, but expect to see us more frequently in  the coming 
months and years. For the giant con on the American psyche continues  apace: 
He was a crazy! It was "vicarious" Post-Traumatic  Stress Disorder! It was 
"Pre-Traumatic" Stress Disorder! It was radical  extremism! It was part of a 
tiny fringe! It doesn't represent Islam! 

All lies. He was devout. He was a jihadist. Period. And many  Muslims 
admire what he did. The Left worries about Muslim backlash. How about  Muslim 
backlash against the infidels? Every _"Soldier of  Allah_ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/11/major-muslims-calling-card-soa-soldier-of
-allah.html) " who  goes jihad is an enemy combatant. Every devout Muslim 
who believes in the word  of the Quran has his or her duty to Islam, his call 
to jihad. Hence this  terrible act of war, the _14,363 Islamic attacks 
across  the world since 9/11_ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/11/roundup-of-jihad-in-america-just-this-past-month.html)
 , and all of 
the relentless _plots to take down America in  the past month alone._ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/11/roundup-of-jihad-in-america
-just-this-past-month.html)  Devout Muslims should be prohibited from 
military service.  Would Patton have recruited Nazis into his army?

I  am writing this on Veterans Day. I call upon all Americans to step back, 
 consider the unfathomable loss at Fort Hood, the ensuing apologia, and the 
 tragic consequences of such behavior. This is a call to action. You're 
either  with us or against us.

Pamela Geller is the editor and publisher of the _Atlas Shrugs _ 
(http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/) web site  and is a former associate 
publisher of 
the New York  Observer. 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to