_Newt: Building of the mosque is a  political statement of ‘shocking 
arrogance.’_ 
(http://www.newt.org/newt-direct/newt-building-mosque-political-statement-‘shocking-arrogance’)
 
August 24, 2010  
_Atlanta Journal-Constitution
_ (http://www.ajc.com/opinion/pro-con-should-a-594940.html) 
It speaks  of the goodness of America that we have had such difficulty 
coming to grips with  the challenge of radical Islamists. It is our very 
commitment to religious  liberty that makes us uncomfortable with defining our 
enemies in a way that  appears linked with religious belief. 
But America’s commitment to religious liberty has given radical  Islamists 
a potent rhetorical weapon in their pursuit of Shariah  supremacy. 
In a deliberately dishonest campaign exploiting our belief in religious  
liberty, radical Islamists are actively engaged in a public relations campaign 
 to try and browbeat and guilt Americans (and other Western countries) to 
accept  the imposition of Shariah in certain communities, no matter how 
deeply Shariah  law is in conflict with the protections afforded by the civil 
law 
and the  democratic values undergirding our constitutional system. 
Shariah law is used in many Muslim countries to justify shocking acts  of 
barbarity including stoning, the execution of homosexuals and the subjugation 
 of women. Shariah does not permit freedom of conscience; it prohibits 
Muslims  from renouncing their Islamic faith or converting to another religion. 
Shariah  does not support religious liberty; it treats non-Muslims as 
inferior and does  not accord them the same protections as Muslims. In these 
and 
other instances,  Shariah is explicitly at odds with core American and 
Western values. 
It is in this context that the controversy over the mosque project near  
ground zero by Feisal Abdul Rauf — an apologist for Shariah — must be  seen. 
On why he choose ground zero to build Cordoba House Rauf told CBN last  May 
that “by being in this location we get the attention and are able to  
leverage the voice of the vast majority of Muslims who condemn  terrorism.” 
Yet, after 9/11 it was Rauf who condemned the United States as an  “
accessory” to the terror attacks and more recently refused to condemn Hamas as  
a 
terrorist organization. Rauf clearly wants the Ground Zero location for a  
propaganda platform but it is also clear that it will not be for the purpose 
of  condemning terrorism. 
Rauf says his project is interfaith, but he didn’t propose the building  of 
a mosque, church and synagogue. 
Instead he is planning a 13-story mosque and community center that will  
extol the glories of Islamic tolerance for people of other faiths, all while  
overlooking the site where radical Islamists killed almost 3,000 people in a 
 shocking act of hatred. 
Building this structure on the edge of the battlefield created by  radical 
Islamists is not a celebration of religious pluralism and mutual  tolerance; 
it is a political statement of shocking arrogance and  hypocrisy. 
We need to have the moral courage to denounce it. It is simply  grotesque 
to erect a mosque at the site of the most visible and powerful symbol  of the 
horrible consequences of radical Islamist ideology. Well-meaning Muslims,  
with common human sensitivity to the victims’ families, realize they have 
plenty  of other places to worship. 
But for radical Islamists, the mosque would become an icon of triumph,  
encouraging them in their challenge to our civilization. 
Apologists for radical Islamist hypocrisy are trying to argue that we  have 
to allow the construction of this mosque in order to prove America’s  
commitment to religious liberty. They say this despite the fact that there are  
already over 100 mosques in New York City. 
In fact, they’re partially correct — this is a test of our commitment  to 
religious liberty. It is a test to see if we have the resolve to face down 
an  ideology that aims to destroy religious liberty in America, and every 
other  freedom we hold dear.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to