Having attended Baptist churches in several states,
I wouldn't be too sure about that.
 
My best guess, it has to do with being honest and self expression.
If you are a Baptist you're supposed to be REAL honest.
OK, you're not supposed to cuss, but honesty can trump
not cussing sometimes.
 
Billy
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
 
 
In a message dated 8/31/2010 7:02:44 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

That has more to do with Texan than Baptist.  

David

   
 
If  you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the 
newspaper  you are misinformed.--Mark  Twain  



On 8/31/2010 12:02 AM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  
 
One thing about Baptists, they can cuss with the best of 'em.
 
Billy 
 
PS  Goddess devotees don't do too badly, either 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
In a message dated 8/30/2010 9:41:02 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   writes:

This reporter is  a f****** idiot. It doesn't raise the question of Palin 
being raaaaacist.  It raises the question of the reporter living in the real 
world or being  on crack. This wasn't f******* heated rhetoric on the part 
of Palin, on  the part of the Mayor's Aide, it most definitely was. But not 
according to  this article. Palinphobia is strong in The Atlantic. 

In fact, most  of the heated rhetoric: raaaaacist, Islamophobe, deniers of 
freedom of  religion, etc, has not come from Palin or other GOP voices. It's 
come from  MOSQUE SUPPORTERS. 

Unless it is Megan McArdle, PLEASE do not pain  me with the utter f******* 
bullshit from the Atlantic again. The left wing  a$$-wipes are not worth 
reading. 

Thanks, 

David  

   
 
If  you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the  
newspaper you are misinformed.--Mark  Twain  



On 8/30/2010 8:00 PM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   wrote:  
 
 
The Atlantic /  July 19, 2010
Sarah Palin and the Ground Zero Mosque
By Chris Good

Sarah Palin, never one to shy away from political  conflict, has come out 
against the mosque and community center being  planned near the former site 
of the World Trade Center in New York,  calling on "peace-seeking Muslims" to 
reject plans for the mosque.  Originally, Palin called on Muslims to 
_"refudiate"_ 
(http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/07/19/sarah-palin-wont-refudiate-mosque-comments/)
  the  mosque, inventing a word in the process of making 
this request. After  deleting that tweet, here's what she had to say in two 
subsequent ones.  From her Twitter account, _...@sarahpalinusa_ 
(http://twitter.com/sarahpalinusa) :  




Peaceful New Yorkers, pls refute the Ground Zero mosque plan if  you 
believe catastrophic pain caused @ Twin Towers site is too raw,  too real



And then:



Peace-seeking Muslims, pls understand, Ground Zero mosque is  UNNECESSARY 
provocation; it stabs hearts. Pls reject it in interest of  healing



As _Politico reported_ 
(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/39899.html) ,  an aide to NYC Mayor 
Michael Bloomberg tweeted at Palin to tell the  
former governor to "mind your business," then asking "whose hearts?  Racist 
hearts?" The aide deleted her tweets shortly after posting them,  explaining 
why she wrote them and that she regretted the "curt  response."


This response raises the question: was Palin being racist?  Addressing her 
request to "peace-seeking Muslims" sounds mildly  unnecessary, as it makes 
an issue out of peacefulness when it comes to  Muslims. Technically speaking 
(and perhaps it's ridiculous to parse  the semantics of a tweet that 
includes the term "refudiate"), this would  not be racism, but religious 
bigotry, 
if that's what it is. Maybe it  reads as if Palin assumes Muslims are not 
peaceful, as a base-line of  how she understands them, and feels the need to 
call out the peaceful  ones as a minority segment of the group. That analysis 
feels like it  imputes a lot, probably too much, about Palin's cultural 
assumptions and  what goes on in her own head.


Given the heated rhetoric over Islamic extremism offered up by  Palin and 
countless other GOP voices on national security over the past  nine years, 
are those imputations a stretch? Probably, but it's easy to  see why 
"peace-seeking Muslims" rings a bit funny in ears that are  already skeptical 
of what 
Palin says, and why non-hawks see national  security conservatives--some of 
whom honestly and expliclty see an  ideological, religious war between 
Islam and the Christian or secular  West--as entertaining some broad-based 
assumptions about Islam as a  whole.


Aside from the nuances of the "racism" question, what's notable (if  
unsurprising) about Palin's tweets is that, while most politicians would  
approach 
with extreme caution something so hot-buttoned and charged with  religion, 
anger, and fear, Palin dives right in without trepidation, on  Twitter no 
less, not carefully calibrating her words, but just taking a  side and 
expressing a stance, controversy be damned. It's the style on  which she prides 
herself, and on this matter of controversy in New York,  she gives us no less.


-- 
Centroids: The  Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 

--  
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to