His endorsement of the Ground Zero mosque is another case of Obama standing "with the Muslims" and against Americans of all other faiths Islam Means the End of Religious Freedom By Daniel Greenfield Sunday, August 15, 2010 At an Iftar dinner in the White House, Barack Hussein Obama proclaimed that he supports the building of the Ground Zero mosque as part of his “ unshakable commitment to religious freedom”. Which of course sounds very noble and good, until you ask a single question, Where is the religious freedom in the Muslim world? Obama has made the case for Islam in America, on the grounds that America’ s religious diversity promotes the religious freedom of all. Islam no less than any other belief system. Yet if introducing Islam into America promotes religious freedom, then why is there no religious freedom in the Muslim world? Why are churches firebombed in Malaysia because Christians presumed to use the word Allah? Why are non-Muslims forbidden to enter the city of Mecca, from which Jews and Christians were ethnically cleansed by Mohammed? Why are Coptic Christians being oppressed and humiliated by the Egyptian government? Why are Muslims murdering Buddhist teachers in Thailand? There are a thousand examples, all of which add up to a single conclusion—Muslims demand religious freedom, yet are not willing to give it to others. Jews are fleeing European cities in record numbers because of Muslim persecution This has ominous implications for the prospects of religious freedom in America. Nor is this a theoretical issue. Jews are fleeing European cities in record numbers because of Muslim persecution. The _recent case of Malmo_ (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/sweden/7278532/Jews-leave-Sw edish-city-after-sharp-rise-in-anti-Semitic-hate-crimes.html) , highlights the fact that Islam actually threatens religious diversity. Simply to protect themselves, Malmo’s 650 Jews _were forced to spend_ (http://swedenisrael.blogspot.com/2010/03/malmos-jews-pay-fortune-for-security.html) half a million Kronor a year. The situation is much the same across Europe, as _Jewish institutions_ (http://thecst.org.uk/) are forced to become fortresses. What the Nazis did not succeed in accomplishing in Europe, the rise of Islam seems to be doing. Nor are Christians safe, they are simply in the majority for now. But Christians and other religions were once in the majority in the Middle East. Until they were massacred and repressed by the tidal wave of Islam. Today the religions that were once a majority, whether it is Jews in Israel, Christians in Byzantium or Zoroastrians in Persia, have become oppressed minorities. Some may take comfort in the notion that “It can’t happen here.” But the fate of Europe’s Jews, shows that it can happen here. And that it is happening here. Religious freedom requires that the religions which enjoy it, agree to tolerate each other. If they do not, instead of religious freedom, there is a religious war. Looking at the religious map of the world today, Islam has grown in non-Muslim countries, while non-Muslims continue to dwindle in Muslim countries. And even the number of non-Muslim religious believers in non-Muslim countries dwindles, when Muslims are introduced into the equation. If Islam were a fish in a fish tank, it’s clear that it would be a piranha. If you put it into the fish tank, very soon you have a lot of Islamic piranhas and only a handful of other fish that survive, only because the piranhas need to keep some of them alive in order to feed on them. If you don’t like that picture, take an honest look at the Muslim world, with its dominant Muslim caste and inferior non-Muslims living in the cracks of their walls, and draw a better one. Over and over again, the rise of Islam has meant the eradication of religious freedom The question is do we want to import this into the United States? Because history and current events show that there is no better way to insure the end of religious freedom in the United States, than to introduce Islam into the picture. Over and over again, the rise of Islam has meant the eradication of religious freedom. And those who fail to learn from that past, will be doomed to repeat it. Obama attempted to position his remarks as being against religious intolerance, but yet he spoke in defense of religious intolerance. Because what greater act of religious intolerance could there than building a mosque in a place where Muslims had previously murdered 3000 Americans? _Nor are such actions unique on the part of Muslims_ (http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2010/08/muslim-hijacking-of-ground-zero.html) , who have routinely hijacked other people’s sacred areas and structures to make a statement about Islamic supremacism. If Islam were truly as tolerant as Obama claims, its adherents would not attempt to build a massive mosque complex that they do not actually need in this place. And what of the Iftar dinner itself which Obama spoke at. The Iftar dinner is the nightly break in the fast of Ramadan. And what is Ramadan? It commemorates the revelation of the first verses of the Koran to Mohammed. And those first verses of the Koran conclude with, “Guide us the straight way, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).” That same verses appears in the daily prayers of Muslims. Ramadan marks the beginning of Islam’s intolerance for other religions Seen in that light, Ramadan marks the beginning of Islam’s intolerance for other religions, as embodied in its scriptures. When _Muslims schools teach pupils_ (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23384657-we-do-use-books-that-call-jews-apes-admits-head-of-islamic-school.do) that Jews are apes and Christians are pigs, they are relying on the wellspring of hate already in the Koran. A non-Muslim country holding an event to mark any aspect of Ramadan is as mad as sheep celebrating their own slaughter. Let’s look at how some of the participants in Obama’s Iftar dinner embody that famous Islamic tolerance. There is _Hassan Jaber, Executive Director of ACCESS_ (http://www.debbieschlussel.com/6276/democratic-delegate-has-terror-ties/) . “ACCESS paid for commercial driving lessons and attempts at hazardous material hauling certificates for two men convicted as part of the Detroit Al-Qaeda sleeper cell. Testimony at their trial revealed that the men planned to bomb the MGM Grand Casino and a host of other prominent US sites.” (_Debbie Schlussel_ (http://www.debbieschlussel.com/6276/democratic-delegate-has-terror-ties/) ). Access has funded a conference at which Sami Al Arian, of Islamic Jihad, spoke. There’s also _Ingrid Mattson_ (http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/08/meet-ingrid-mattson-appearing-today-at-the-democratic-nat ional-convention.html) , who is against any reform of Islam and places loyalty to Islam before America. There’s MPAC’s Salam Al Marayat, who has _defended Hezbollah_ (http://www.jstreetjive.com/2009/10/meet-pro-israel-keynoters-salam-al.html) who_ has been described as having_ (http://www.danielpipes.org/312/needed-muslims-against-terror-and-not-salam-al-marayati) “ disturbing sympathies for Islamic terrorists”. _Dalia Mogahed_ (http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/10/obama-fi rst-female-veiled-islamist-appointee-dalia-mogahed-promotes-sharia-says-its-misunderstood.html) , an apologist for Sharia law and the subjugation of women. And those are only some of the names in attendance. Finally let’s turn to Obama’s own enthusiasm for religious freedom. That enthusiasm was markedly absent when Caplin and Drysdale_ lawyers were intimidating conservative. churches_ (http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2008/10/attempts-to-whitewash-palin-rally.html) . They even _intimidated Jewish non-profit groups who wanted Palin to speak at an Anti-Ahmadinejad rally_ (http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2008/10/attempts-to-whitewash-palin-rally.html) , by threatening their tax exempt status. Mortimer Caplin was a major supporter of Obama, and part of Obama for America. But Obama was not upset when his supporters were silencing the religious freedom of Christians and Jews. Which suggests that his “Unshakable Commitment to Religious Freedom” is actually rather shaky indeed. And appears to be reserved for Muslims. Which would reaffirm what Obama _himself said in his own book_ (http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/2008/02/i-will-stand-wi.html) ; “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction”. His endorsement of the Ground Zero mosque is another case of Obama standing “with the Muslims” and against Americans of all other faiths His endorsement of the Ground Zero mosque is another case of Obama standing “with the Muslims” and against Americans of all other faiths, who want the freedom to practice their religion in peace without harassment, persecution and violence from the followers of Islam, who believe that all other religions are invalid, and that all forms of government and law that are not governed by the Koran, have no right to exist. Religious Freedom must be defended, from all those who would take it away. The history of Islam is the history of genocide, oppression and ethnic cleansing practiced by Muslims against non-Muslims. Islam is the death blow to religious diversity and freedom. And nowhere better is that seen than Mecca, a city that was once a mecca for different religions, which is now barred to all but Muslims. Mecca is the Muslim ideal. And it exemplifies what they hope to accomplish. Meanwhile, Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais, the Imam of the Grand Mosque of Mecca, has praised terrorism saying “Allahu Akbar! These are signs of victory: Jihad has remained the only wining card and the light of hope in the hands of those sincere people among the Ummah”. He has called Jews “scum of the earth” and “rats of the world”, Christians, “cross-worshipers” and filled with “rotten ideas and poisonous culture” and had similarly charming things to say of Hindus. This is how the world looks from Mecca, the heart of Islam. And this is why Islam and religious freedom are incompatible. Obama concluded his remarks by saying: “And we can only achieve “liberty and justice for all” if we live by that one rule at the heart of every great religion, including Islam — that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.” But that is not the rule at the heart of Islam. And this is _not the first time that he has tried to sell that particular lie_ (http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2009/02/obama-falsely-promotes-islamic-golden.html) . But Islam never equates Muslims with non-Muslims, as Obama pretends it does. Its offer of brotherhood is only open to fellow Muslims. Its tolerance is only for fellow Muslims. And that is at the heart of the problem. And it is why the rise of Islam means the end of liberty and justice for all. To stand for liberty and justice is to take a stand against Islamic bigotry. -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
