Lennart :
Thanks for sending this  along. Very worthwhile to think about.
Can't exactly disagree with much of  anything. Well said.
 
The only observation to make that is  somewhat critical is the absence
of an example of how this philosophy might be used to solve
a really serious political problem. And why the bottom line
should be more than splitting the difference.
 
Yes, consider what pro-choice people say. Some of their arguments  make
real sense. But the objective must be major decline in abortions,  not
diminishing them by some mid point compromise. And so on, with  respect
to a number of other thorny issues.
 
HOW do you do that ?  Unclear from the essay.
 
Otherwise, very good.
 
Billy
 
====================================================
 
In a message dated 9/22/2010 10:56:28  A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

_http://www.qideas.org/blog/what-we-need-this-election-season-a-radical-chri
stian-center.aspx_ 
(http://www.qideas.org/blog/what-we-need-this-election-season-a-radical-christian-center.aspx)
 

By Steve Monsa

My local paper recently  carried an op-ed by a nationally syndicated 
columnist who is an evangelical  Christian. He cited recent news reports of 
Fidel 
Castro beginning to move in  the direction of embracing some elements of 
free enterprise for Cuba.  He  then contrasted this with Barack Obama’s moving 
of the United States towards  bigger, “socialist” government.  The 
columnist questions why Obama is  embracing big government just when one of the 
few 
remaining socialist states  is moving towards capitalism.  His number one 
exhibit “proving” his point  is that Obama is urging Congress not to extend 
the 2001 tax cut for persons  making over $250,000 annually.

Put simply, this is nonsense.  To  imply that the United States under 
President Obama and Cuba under Fidel Castro  are on contrasting 
trajectories—with 
President Obama moving the United States  towards the big-government 
socialism that Cuba is abandoning—is simply  parroting the latest talking 
points 
put out by partisan Republican operatives.  

More than nonsense, it is destructive of what Christians can and  should be 
offering the American people this election season.  And young  Christians—
who increasingly are supporting creation care efforts, are taking  part in 
feeding programs at central city missions, and in other ways are  living out 
the gospel through acts of service—will be further alienated from  the 
political process.

Don’t get me wrong.  This is not an apology  for the left, Christian or 
otherwise.  From my experience the left and  the right—including so-called 
spokespersons for the Christian right and the  Christian left—are both guilty 
of 
oversimplifications and of being used by  political operatives more cynical 
than they.

[_Are Christians too political? Pastor Mark  Batterson responds on the Q 
podcast_ (http://www.qideas.org/audio/too-political.aspx) .]

This leads me to plead for a radical  Christian center.  Centrism may 
appear to be wishy-washy and undecided or  so apathetic that one refuses to 
take 
sides.  But a radical Christian  center is far from being either.  It is 
radical in that it goes to the  root of today’s political issues, asking basic 
questions of purpose, value,  and worth.  It puts the common good ahead of 
partisan advantage and  narrow special interests.  If you don’t think that is 
radical, you  haven’t been paying much attention to this fall’s partisan 
election  campaigns.

Such an agenda is Christian in the sense that in answering  questions of 
purpose, value, worth, and the common good one turns to the  Bible, to 
Christian leaders, to the two thousand year old wisdom of the Church  for help 
and 
insight.  One then views government as having an  appropriate, God-given 
role to restrain evil and promote good.  But it  also views government with a 
certain skepticism and recognizes that what God  intends to be a force for 
good can be turned to evil ends—or at the least will  often be a mixed bag of 
good and the less-than-good.  

It is  centrist—and also radical—in the sense of refusing to embrace 
either today’s  left or right.  Nor does it simply split the difference between 
 
them.  Instead, it seeks new approaches and new ideas that both the left  
and the right will have trouble embracing. Most of these new approaches and  
ideas will involve using government as a driver of reforms (this will drive  
the right nuts), but not as the implementer of the reforms (this will drive  
the left nuts).  

Two examples may help.  Government will be  actively involved in helping 
those trapped in poverty, but it will turn to  local faith-based and other 
nonprofit organizations to develop and run the  actual, concrete programs. In 
regard to creation care, government will set  certain standards that will 
reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce the toxins  in our waters, and lead to 
more recycling of used materials, but will avoid  dictating the exact means 
to reach those standards and then enforcing them  with new government 
bureaucracies.  Instead, it will craft economic  incentives strong enough to 
encourage local communities and the free  enterprise system to figure out how 
best to reach those  standards.

[_For more on how faith and  government can partner together, watch the Q 
talk on "Church and State" by  Joshua Dubois, White House Executive Director 
of Faith-based and Neighborhood  Partnerships._ 
(http://www.qideas.org/video/the-church-and-the-state.aspx) ]

Christians  in the United States have the numbers, the commitment, and the 
incentive to  free themselves from the clutches of both the left and the 
right.  In  doing so they can change the contours of today’s political 
landscape.  If  we are to do so, we need to go back to the basics of our faith, 
rethink for  ourselves how to apply them to today’s challenges, and carve out a 
radical  Christian center that is more faithful to our Lord and his will 
than any of  the political positions being urged upon us right now.
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical  Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group:  _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 


-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to