London Telegraph
 
 
India's relationship with the Anglosphere will define the twenty-first  
century 

 
 

 
By  _Daniel Hannan_ 
(http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/danielhannan/)  _Politics_ 
(http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/category/politics/)  Last  
updated: September 25th, 2010



 
The Anglosphere, for anyone who still doesn’t know, is the community of  
free, English-speaking nations linked, not by governmental decree, but by 
shared  values. Which nations, exactly? Good question. The UK and Ireland, 
obviously,  the US and Canada, Australia and New Zealand, plus what’s left of 
the 
Britain’s  extended archipelago (the Falkland Islands, Bermuda and so on). 
Who else? I’d  say Malta, Singapore and perhaps Hong Kong. I hope these 
territories won’t take  it amiss, though, if I point out that, relatively 
speaking, they’re tiddlers.  The elephant – for once the metaphor seems 
apposite –
 is India.  
The Indian Question dominated a fascinating conference on the Anglosphere 
in  Winchester yesterday, co-hosted by two of the greatest conservative 
editors on  the planet: Daniel Johnson of Prospect, and Roger Kimball of The  
New 
Criterion. Some of the cleverest and most contrarian men in the US,  
Canada, Australia, New Zealand and India were present. 
Mark Steyn – _the Anglosphere’s one-man news-service_ 
(http://www.marksteyn.com/)   (http://www.marksteyn.com/) – made the depressing 
observation that 
some Caribbean states, with  their Hansards and maces, their horsehair wigs 
and stiff blue passports, seemed  more British than the EU-oppressed mother 
country. West Indians, like Indians,  appeared to value parliamentary 
democracy more than the country which had  developed and exported the concept. 
James Bennett, who more or less invented the Anglosphere, saw India as the  
key. While it might be awkward to talk of a nation of 1.3 billion people  “
joining” a club of 400 million, the orientation of India would determine the 
 relative power of the English-speaking democracies for the rest of the  
century. 
When passing through Delhi recently, _I p_ 
(http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/3676521/The_borders_of_the_Anglosphere/)
 _ointed out_ 
(http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/3676521/The_borders_of_the_Anglosph
ere/)  that the city feels more familiar,  less foreign, than it did a 
decade ago – partly because the Indian middle class  is ballooning, partly 
because the English language is more widespread and partly  because of 
migration. 
Communities of Indian descent remain in almost  every corner of the 
Commonwealth, including those which British settlers  evacuated long ago: Fiji, 
South Africa, Malaysia, East Africa, the Caribbean,  Australia, New Zealand, 
Singapore, Canada – and increasingly, of course, the US.  In Madras, once, I 
asked directions of a young woman in an exotic sari. “Sorry,  love, I dunno,”
 she replied in broad Cockney. Like me, she was a tourist – a  small 
reminder of how affordable air travel has led to a convergence of nations  
separated by oceans and deserts, but bound by language and law. What Jet 
Airways  
has done for millions, the Internet has done for hundreds of millions, 
drawing  the English-speaking peoples into _a common conversation_ 
(http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100051187/the-internet-is-gradually-reorient
ing-britain-away-from-europe-and-toward-the-anglosphere/) . 
I don’t want to overstate my case. There are lakhs of Indian villages where 
 Jet Airways and the Internet are as remote as the Moon. But the trend is  
encouraging. India’s institutions – its courts, its parliament, its armed 
forces  – are Anglosphere-compatible. When the US, Australian and Indian 
navies  co-ordinated the tsunami relief efforts six years ago, they found they 
had a  functional interoperability that is not always present even among Nato 
 allies. 
Almost all post-colonial governments begin by emphasising their distance 
from  the former occupiers, and India was no exception. But technological 
change and  rapid embourgeoisement are realigning India with the other 
Anglophone  democracies. David Cameron, to his credit, grasps that power is 
shifting  
eastward, and sees the opportunity for Britain. Barack Obama, by contrast, 
seems  to scorn the vast ally which Bush had secured. Fortunately, Indians 
seem content  to wait for a different attitude from Washington. They are a 
patient and  courteous people

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to