That explains it pretty well.
 
The next question, what would he say about Communists ?  That the only  bad 
ones
are those caught in the act ? 
 
Granted. it isn't nearly the problem it once was, these days you mostly can 
 skate around it,
but he was alive and well during the Cold War. How did he deal  with the 
issue back then ?
 
Billy
 
============================================
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/26/2010 8:35:21 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Jumped the shark. 

The Old School  Libertarian Foreign Affairs policy is shining through. It's 
noble: Innocent  until proven guilty, but you have to be living in a cave 
to think that there's  not enough evidence for guilt out there. He would 
probably require the finding  of more than 50 % of all Muslims guilty of 
terrorist acts before he would  consider "Muslims" guilty. And that still might 
not 
be enough. "Individual  rights," so "Individual guilt." If you cannot 
convict all of them, then it  isn't (yeah, right) the religion. 

David

  
 
To  compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which 
he  disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.--Thomas  Jefferson 



On 9/24/2010 5:37 PM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  





This is totally disgusting, Ron Paul's ignorance is monumental.
In fact, Ron Paul comes across as an idiot. He doesn't know
what the hell he is talking about.
 
Listen to the whole interview if you want.
BR
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
 
 
 
_Ron  Paul: Goal Of Protesting NYC Mosque Is To Blame Islam For  9/11_ 
(http://www.ronpaul.com/2010-08-23/ron-paul-on-cnn-anderson-cooper-360°/) 
 
( partial ) Transcript
 
August 23, 2010
Sanjay Gupta: Those are the facts,  as we can tell. But there are some who 
say it simply isn’t for any of us to  pass judgment on who should build a 
mosque, and where they should build it,  as long as it’s on private property 
and no laws are broken. New York Mayor,  Mike Bloomberg, he believes that 
and, apparently, so does Republican  Congressman and former presidential 
candidate, _Ron  Paul_ (http://www.ronpaulnews.com/) . And he joins us now from 
Clute,  Texas. Thanks for joining us, Congressman. 
Ron Paul: Thank you, good to be with  you. 
Sanjay Gupta: Now, I read your  article and you say this whole issue is 
really an issue of property rights  and everything else is “really about hate 
and Islamaphobia”. But, you know,  I want to start by asking: is what 
happened on September 11, 9 years ago,  different; the worst terrorist attack 
on 
U.S. soil? Are there certain lines  to be drawn even when it comes to this 
property rights  issue? 
Ron Paul: No, you should draw lines.  But I think the lines are being drawn 
improperly. Al-Qaida was responsible,  several hundred Al-Qaida existed at 
that time. And maybe there are still  several hundred more. But that doesn’t 
mean the whole Muslim religion should  be indicted: that is my complaint. I 
mean, McVeigh probably was a Christian  and he bombed the Oklahoma Federal 
building, but does that mean that a  Christian church can’t be built near 
there and Christianity is blamed? No, I  don’t like that broad brush. So yes, 
the violence was committed by Al-Qaida  and they’re bad people and we should 
do what we can to destroy them. But  that doesn’t mean that we should 
destroy the whole concept of the Muslim  religion. And if they can bring this 
out, whether the mosque is stopped or  not, the implication here is that Islam c
aused 9/11, not a narrow branch of  the Al-Qaida. To me, that is crucial 
because it deals with our foreign  policy, it deals with … you know, even in 
that clip earlier on Madeleine  Albright admitted. She said, “Well, if 
500,000 people are killed, so be it  if that’s what it takes”. So the Muslims 
have justification for their  worries and concerns. 
Sanjay  Gupta: There is a lot of pain and anguish, I think, from people who 
 are worried about this Islamic center being built. Do you see that point 
of  view at all? 
Ron Paul: To worry about it? Well, I  worry about it because I’m afraid it 
stirs up hatred and that’s why I worry  about it. And I think they’re off 
on a tangent. I think the purpose was, too  often, to just blame Islam. But 
there is another Mosque in that area, this  is not right where the towers 
were, this is not too far down the street.  But, what about the strip joints? 
Are these people who are “holier than  thou” condemning the strip joints 
nearby because it defames Ground Zero? So  I don’t think that’s any 
consistency. I think this goal was to blame Islam  for 9/11 and I think that is 
wrong. 
I don’t think that was the cause.  Al-Qaida did it. 
Sanjay Gupta: And you talk about the  fact that there is a lot of 
Islamaphobia. I mean, your son, _Rand  Paul_ (http://www.randpaul.com/) , who’s 
running for the U.S. Senate in  Kentucky, is opposed to this facility being 
built. Is he  Islamaphobic? 
Ron Paul: Well, I don’t know what  his position is, but he’s certainly not 
islamaphoic. 
Ron Paul: Well no, I don’t put  everybody who is a candidate in that same 
category that might have a reason.  You have to ask him for his reason. But 
no, everybody who’s opposing it  doesn’t even understand the foreign policy 
or why we’re in Iraq and  Afghanistan. They don’t have this understanding, 
they don’t want to see the  connection. My goal is to make the connection 
for people to understand  what’s going on and why Al-Qaida has become so 
militant and hateful toward  us and why painting Islam with a broad brush makes 
our problems worse  because we’re not narrowing down on the real cause and 
those who perpetuated  9/11. And if we don’t get to that, we can’t solve this 
 problem 
Sanjay Gupta: Do you think it should  be built? 
Ron Paul: I don’t care whether it’s  built or not built. Everybody says it’
s private property and they should be  able to do what they want to do. 
Once again, the point I’m making is not to  blame Islam for 9/11, you have to 
blame only Al-Qaida. That is a completely  different story than all these 
innuendoes that you’re bringing up, I don’t  think that’s part of the 
question. You have to narrow it in because it has  to do with our foreign 
policy and 
that’s what I’m dealing with; the foreign  policy. The foreign policy is 
crucial because that’s why we have perpetual  war. And I think this is all 
connected, not in a way that is conspiratorial,  but in a way that it is 
almost like people slip into this. It’s really easy  for people to get to 
hating 
Islam.  
To me, that’s equivalent to hating Christians because  Timothy McVeigh was 
a Christian, and that I don’t like, nobody should like  it, nobody should 
like this being painted with a broad brush. It was done to  the Jews before 
and I don’t like it. I like to stick to the facts, I like to  talk about the 
foreign policy and how it’s related.  
The sideshow which is what I call this, is just there  to stir things up 
and prevent us from dealing with the real problems, and  that is our 
interventionist foreign policy that gets us too much involved  overseas, too 
many 
people die on both side and we’re totally bankrupt and we  have to address 
that. We have to get away from: “Are we going to support the  building of the 
mosque?” and that was sort of the innuendos when you bring  up with the 
question about my son. I mean, you’re missing the whole point  when you think 
that 
is the crucial question. The crucial question is our  foreign policy. That’
s what I want the people to think  about. 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the  Radical Centrist Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 


-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to