Centroids :
Let's say this article is 100 % true. Could be, it does square  with what I 
know about Oman
and Sultan Qabus, the nation's English educated ruler.  Kristoff's 
implication is, "see, Islam
can produce modern Westernized societies , the problem isn't  Muslim 
religion."
 
Trouble with that view, is that, while you can make something  like that 
kind of case
for Qatar, but actually not so simply, it isn't literally true  for Oman, 
the one Ibadi
Muslim state in the world. As for Qatar, if   I remember correctly, while 
not
Ibadi now, historically it was in the Ibadi orbit.
 
The Ibadis can be primitive and backward, as the article makes  clear, but 
the analog
that seems instructive might be a comparison to Russian  Orthodoxy, which 
can support
either intense modernization OR overt retrogression, as  in the case of 
sects of
so-called "Old Believers."
 
Anyway, the ultimate source of Ibadi Islam is a long gone  movement in 
early Islam
which, oddly to us, combined "liberalism"  based on  something like a "free 
thought"
version of Islam, with serious fanaticism. Mostly a memory  these days, 
regardless
the product was , for Islam, a fairly tolerant society,  indeed, the only 
one in the
Mid East that gives more-or-less equal status to Hindus and  others, the
Hindu element important since there is a substantial minority  replete
with their own temples.
 
Anyway, an interesting article from someone who, at least half  the time,
I utterly despise and hate.
 
Billy
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
 
 
 
What Oman Can  Teach Us
By _NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/nicholasdkristof/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
 
Published: October 13, 2010

 
 
Muscat , Oman
 
As the United States relies on firepower to try to crush extremism in  
Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen, it might instead consider the lesson of the  
remarkable Arab country of Oman.  
Just 40 years ago, Oman was one of the most hidebound societies in the 
world.  There was no television, and radios were banned as the work of the 
devil. There  were no Omani diplomats abroad, and the sultan kept his country 
in 
almost  complete isolation.  
Oman, a country about the size of Kansas, had just six miles of paved road, 
 and the majority of the population was illiterate and fiercely tribal. The 
 country had a measly three schools serving 909 pupils — all boys in 
primary  grades. Not one girl in Oman was in school.  
Oman’s capital city, Muscat, nestled among rocky hills in the desert of the 
 Arabian Peninsula, was surrounded by a traditional wall. At dusk, the  
authorities would fire a cannon and then close the city’s gates for the night.  
Anyone seen walking outside without a torch at night was subject to being 
shot.  
Oman was historically similar to its neighbor, Yemen, which now has become 
an  incubator for Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists. But, in 1970, Oman left 
that  fundamentalist track: the sultan’s son deposed his father and started a 
stunning  modernization built around education for boys and girls alike.  
Visit Oman today, and it is a contemporary country with highways, sleek new 
 airports, satellite TV dishes and a range of public and private 
universities.  Children start studying English and computers in the first 
grade. Boys 
and girls  alike are expected to finish high school at least.  
It’s peaceful and pro-Western, without the widespread fundamentalism and  
terrorism that afflict Yemen. Granted, Yemen may be the most beautiful 
country  in the Arab world, but my hunch is that many of the young Westerners 
who 
study  Arabic there will end up relocating to Oman because of the 
tranquility here.  
It’s particularly striking how the role of women has been transformed. One  
18-year-old university student I spoke to, Rihab Ahmed al-Rhabi, told me 
(in  fluent English) of her interest in entrepreneurship. She also told me,  
affectionately, about her grandmother who is illiterate, was married at age 9 
 and bore 10 children.  
As for Ms. Rhabi, she mentioned that she doesn’t want to bog herself down  
with a husband anytime soon. Otherwise, what if her husband didn’t want her 
to  study abroad? And when she does eventually marry, she mused, one child 
would be  about right.  
Ms. Rhabi was a member of the Omani all-girls team that won the gold medal 
in  an entrepreneurship competition across the Arab world last year. The 
contest was  organized by Injaz, _a superb organization_ 
(http://www.injazalarab.org/en)  that goes into schools around the  Arab world 
to train young 
people in starting and running small businesses.  
The stand-out young entrepreneurs in Oman today are mostly female: 9 of the 
 11 finalists in this year’s Oman entrepreneurship contest were all-girl 
teams.  The winning team bowled me over. The members started as high school 
juniors by  forming a company to publish children’s picture books in Arabic. 
They raised  capital, conducted market research, designed and wrote the books 
and oversaw  marketing and distribution.  
“We’re now looking at publishing e-books,” explained Ameera Tariq, a high  
school senior and a member of the board of directors of the team’s book 
company.  Maybe one of the customers for a future electronic picture book will 
be her  grandmother, who was married at the age of 12 and has never learned 
to read.  
In short, one of the lessons of Oman is that one of the best and most  
cost-effective ways to tame extremism is to promote education for all.  
Many researchers have found links between rising education and reduced  
conflict. _One study_ 
(http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2010/06_pakistan_education_winthrop/06_pakistan_education_winthrop.pdf)
  published 
in 2006, for example, suggested  that a doubling of primary school 
enrollment in a poor country was associated  with halving the risk of civil 
war. 
Another found that raising the average  educational attainment in a country by 
a 
single grade could significantly reduce  the risk of conflict.  
Sorry if this emphasis on education sounds like a cliché. It’s widely  
acknowledged in theory, and President Obama pledged as a candidate that he 
would 
 start a $2 billion global education fund. But nothing has come of it. 
Instead,  he’s spending 50 times as much this year alone on American troops in 
Afghanistan  — even though military solutions don’t have as good a record in 
trouble spots as  education does.  
The pattern seems widespread: Everybody gives lip service to education, but 
 nobody funds it.  
For me, the lesson of Oman has to do with my next stops on this trip:  
Afghanistan and Pakistan. If we want to see them recast as peaceful societies,  
then let’s try investing less in bombs and more in schools. 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to