Ernie : You said--
Most of Obama's problems aren't his fault.  But they *are* his  
responsibility, 
and so far he hasn't truly stepped up.
 
Does he know how to "step up" to dealing with the problems ?  Seems to  me--
and a lot of others--  that he is essentially clueless. Reason for his  
cluelessness
is his ideology. When all is said, his idea of "centrism" is that the  
standard
Left-wing views of the urban Democratic Party are the actual "middle" and  
his
only Left consists of  de facto  neo-Communists ( the  high dudgeon 
"Progressives" )
with moderate Republicans the only legitimate Right, and conservatives so  
many
extremist Rightists, as if they are all little better than neo-Nazis. Hence 
 his
demonization  of Fox News and the more-or-less "libertarian" Tea  Party,
which he doesn't really understand at all.
 
That is, politically he is naive and not well informed. And apparently he  
has
no real desire to become well informed.
 
His political inexperience, combined with his ideology, and you got the  
formula 
for a "perfect storm."  The debacle has two main parts, maybe  three.
 
First, the need should have been clear from day # 1 that all else had to be 
 FAR down
on the totem pole in terms of priorities, to the extent that before moving  
on any other
major legislation the economy had to be fixed, really fixed, not just "hope 
 for change"
after passing a couple of bailouts.
 
Instead, because of his urban ideology, think South Side of Chicago, BHO's  
big concern
was what he could do for his former social worker constituents that might  
matter the most
to them, hence Health Care Reform. But instead of adopting a pragmatic  
approach,
some now, the rest later, he chose to go for a grand package.
 
But, as in 1993 under Bubba, all Republican ideas ( OK a few minor  
exceptions )
were denied on principle, and generally in Congress no GOP rep or  senator
could even offer amendments. So, as Halperin did not say, the  Republicans
had good reason to become outright obstructionists, they were being  handed
a take it or leave it set of proposals, and their tough luck. This pixxed  
them off.
 
Motivated to find fault with the Health care bill, they found MANY, not a  
suprise
since Obama turned the drafting over to the Congress with little WH  
leadership
and, as a result, the bill was a mish-mash that satisfied almost no-one.  
Politically
it was very poorly received, with the Democratic Left just about as  unhappy
as the Republican Right, and average voters disillusioned with the next to  
nothing
they got, since many major provisions don't even take effect until 2014.  
Worse, as the
Republicans pointed out, insurance costs for most folks would inevitably go 
 up,
not down, when insurance companies readjusted rates.
 
I think, too, a good slice of the electorate was not at all happy with the  
provision
to insure not all of the uninsured, but the habitual welfare class, those  
who,
in many eyes, don't deserve any such thing and are a drag on the  system
in 100 different ways and ought to stop breeding. I think this  summarizes
this attitude well enough.
 
Anyway, as the unemployment picture went from bad to worse, although  there
eventually was a decline from 10 and a half to 9 and a half, news of  
billions of dollars
in bonus payouts to rich bankers had an impact, especially galling since  
TARP money
was given with no strings attached as far as bank responsibility to the  
"real economy."
NONE, and therefore cash hoarding on Wall Street ( now 2 or 3 trillion )  
and
almost no new job creation.
 
All of this while BHO was spending almost a full year seeking Health Care  
to accommodate
welfare parasites, at least so a lot of people viewed it.
 
So the voters sent a message  --in New Jersey, Virginia and stunningly  in 
Massachusetts,
and it was completely ignored. Hence perceived arrogance on the part of the 
 WH.
 
Then came more pushing to homosexualize the military, the appointment of  
two hard Left
Supreme Court justices, and perceived ineptitude when the Gulf oil spill  
crisis hit, the
equivalent for Obama of Katrina for George W.  The backdrop was  daily 
speech making
by the prez, waaaay to much speech making, 32 rounds of golf, and a dozen  
vacations 
to Martha's Vinyard. Followed by a series of Islamic incidents, the Ft Hood 
 murderer, 
the GZ mosque, etc, in all cases which left the clear impression that Obama 
 is pro-Muslim 
and not much ( if at all ) of a Christian.
 
In short, I'd put the emphasis on Halperin's opening statement about BHO  
caught
between  elite opinion to the effect that he is incompetent ( now  an 
Absolute Truism )
and working class opinion  ( another truism beyond debate ) that Obama  is
complete poison for the economy.
 
We got what he is, not what he led people to believe they were voting for. 
We got a lawyer from an Ivy League school with pretensions of  superiority,
a social worker with a social worker's worldview, and an ideological  
Leftist.
 
Speaking of selling the public a bill of goods, 2008 was the biggest con  
job
of American history, at a minimum, the biggest con job since Nixon in  1972.
Now a lot of people wonder how it all went wrong ?  Hell, what did  anyone
really expect when the elected someone who can be thought of as the
political equivalent of Bernie Madoff ? For which, at the end of the  day,
the man most responsible for how this all came about was George W  Bush.
 
Alas, it never is a good idea to replace one screw-up with another  
screw-up.
 
My most humble and self-effacing Radical Centrist opinion
 
Billy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/14/2010 2:17:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:



On Oct 14, 2010, at 11:24 AM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  
wrote:

Most of Obama's private (and sometimes public)  rebuttals to the voices 
slamming him on all sides are justified or spot on.  He did inherit a lot of 
problems from the Bush Administration. He did act  quickly in the initial 
weeks of his Administration to stave off a worldwide  depression. His efforts 
at 
job creation have been obstructed by Republicans  (even the proposals based 
on policies supported by the GOP in the past). His  opponents haven't put 
forth specifics of their own, nor offered genuine  compromise, while the 
media have allowed the right's activists and gabbers  to run wild with 
criticism 
without furnishing legitimate alternative  solutions. _(See Barack Obama's 
top 10 sound  bites.)_ 
(http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1954949_1954934,00.html)
  
But Obama has exacerbated his political  problems not just by failing to 
enact policies that would have actually  turned the economy around, but also 
by authorizing a series of tactical  moves intended to demonize Republicans 
and distract from the problems at  hand. He has wasted time lambasting his 
foes when he should have been  putting forth his agenda in a clear, optimistic 
fashion, defending the  benefits of his key decisions during the past two 
years (health care and the  Troubled Asset Relief Program, for example) and 
explaining what he would do  with a re-elected Democratic majority to spur 
growth. 


Nice analysis; very Radical Centrist.


Most of Obama's problems aren't his fault.  But they *are* his  
responsibility, and so far he hasn't truly stepped up.


-- Ernie P.


=


 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to