Israel and  Congressional Democrats
by Daniel Pipes
_National Review Online_ 
(http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/250159/israel-and-congressional-democrats-daniel-pipes)
 
October 19, 2010 
_http://www.danielpipes.org/8994/israel-congressional-democrats_ 
(http://www.danielpipes.org/8994/israel-congressional-democrats)  
How should American voters concerned with Israel's  welfare and security 
vote in the U.S. Congressional elections on Nov. 2? 
This much is clear after almost two years of  Democratic control over the 
executive and legislative branches of government:  Democrats consistently 
support Israel and its government far less than do  Republicans. Leaving Barack 
Obama aside for now (he's not on the ballot), let's  focus on Congress and 
on voters. 
 
An ad by the Republican Jewish  Coalition point out weaker Democratic 
support for Israel.Congress: The  pattern of weak Democratic support began just 
a 
week after Inauguration Day  2009, right after the Israel-Hamas war, when 
_60  House Democrats_ 
(http://olver.house.gov/index.php?view=article&catid=8:press-releases&id=50&format=pdf&option=com_content&Itemid=25)
  (including 
such left-wingers as Dennis Kucinich, Barbara  Lee, and Maxine Waters) and not 
a single Republican wrote the secretary of state  to "respectfully request 
that the State Department release emergency funds to  [the anti-Israel 
organization] UNRWA for reconstruction and humanitarian  assistance" in Gaza. 
In the same spirit, _54  House Democrats_ 
(http://minnesotaindependent.com/54474/ellison-oberstar-and-mccollum-urge-lifting-of-gaza-blockade)
  and not 
a single Republican signed a letter to Barack Obama  a year later, in 
January 2010, asking him to "advocate for immediate  improvements for Gaza in 
the 
following areas" and then listed ten ways to help  Hamas, the Palestinian 
terrorist organization. 
In dramatic contrast, _78  House Republicans_ 
(http://rsc.tomprice.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Final_Flotilla_Letter_to_PM_Netanyahu_June_11_2010_2.pdf)
  
wrote a "Dear Prime Minister Netanyahu" letter a few  months later to express 
their "steadfast support" for him and Israel. The  signatories were not 
just Republicans but members of the _House Republican  Study Committee_ 
(http://rsc.tomprice.house.gov/aboutrsc/whatisrsc.htm) , a conservative caucus. 
So, count 54 Democrats for Hamas and 78  Republicans for Israel. 
In the aftermath of the March 2010 crisis when Joe  Biden went to 
Jerusalem, _333  members_ 
(http://www.aipac.org/Publications/SourceMaterialsCongressionalAction/Signatories_to_Hoyer-Cantor_Letter.pdf)
  of the House of 
Representatives signed a_  letter_ 
(http://www.aipac.org/Publications/SourceMaterialsCongressionalAction/HoyerCantorLetterDC.pdf)
  to the secretary of state 
reaffirming the U.S.-Israel alliance. The  _102 members_ 
(http://zionism-israel.com/ezine/Hoyt-Cantor.htm)  who did  not sign included 
94 Democrats 
(including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi) and  8 Republicans, a 12-to-1 
ratio. 
Seventy-six _senators_ 
(http://www.aipac.org/Publications/SourceMaterialsCongressionalAction/Signatories_to_Boxer-Isakson_Letter.pdf)
   signed a similar 
letter; the 24 who did not sign included 20 Democrats and 4  Republicans, a 
5-to-1 ratio. 
Voters: Public opinion explains these  differences on Capitol Hill. 
An April 2009 poll by Zogby International asked  about _U.S.  policy_ 
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-zogby/democratic-republican-vie_b_191180.html
) : Ten percent of Obama voters and 60 percent of voters for Republican  
John McCain wanted the president to support Israel. Get tough with Israel?  
Eighty percent of Obama voters said yes and 73 percent of McCain voters said 
no.  Conversely, 67 percent of Obama voters said yes and 79 percent of McCain 
voters  said no to Washington engaging with Hamas. And 61 percent of Obama 
voters  endorsed a Palestinian "right of return," while only 21 percent of 
McCain voters  concurred. 
Almost a year later, the same pollster asked  American adults _how best to 
deal with the  Arab-Israeli conflict_ 
(http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1836)  and found "a strong divide" 
on this question.  Seventy-three 
percent of Democrats wanted the president to end the historic bond  with Israel 
but treat Arabs and Israelis alike; only 24 percent of Republicans  
endorsed this shift. 
 
Gallup on "Sympathy for Israelis  vs. Palestinians in Mideast Situation, by 
Party ID." 
A _survey_ 
(http://www.committeeforisrael.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ECI-National-Poll-Crosstabs-Part-1.pdfhttp:/www.committeeforisrael.com/)
   
this month asked if a likely voter is "more likely or less likely to vote for a 
 candidate whom you perceive as pro-Israel." Thirty-nine percent of 
Democrats and  69 percent of Republicans prefer the pro-Israel candidate. 
Turned 
around, 33  percent of Democrats and 14 percent of Republicans would be less 
likely to  support a candidate because he is pro-Israel. Democrats are 
somewhat evenly  split on Israel but Republicans favor it by a 5-to-1 ratio. 
A consensus exists that the two parties are  growing further apart over 
time. Pro-Israel, conservative _Jeff  Jacoby_ 
(http://www.jeffjacoby.com/7161/support-for-israel-runs-on-party-lines)  of the 
Boston Globe finds that "the 
old political consensus  that brought Republicans and Democrats together in 
support of the Middle East's  only flourishing democracy is breaking down." 
Anti-Israel, left-wing James Zogby  of the Arab American Institute agrees, 
writing that "traditional U.S. policy  toward the Israeli-Palestinian 
conflict does not have bipartisan backing."  Thanks to changes in the 
Democratic 
party, Israel has become a partisan issue in  American politics, an unwelcome 
development for it. 
In late March 2010, during a nadir of U.S.-Israel  relations, _Janine  
Zacharia_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/25/AR2010032502153_pf.html)
  wrote in the Washington Post that some Israelis expect 
their  prime minister to "search for ways to buy time until the midterm U.S. 
elections  [of November 2010] in hopes that Obama would lose support and 
that more  pro-Israel Republicans would be elected." That an Israeli leader is 
thought to  stall for fewer Congressional Democrats confirms the changes 
outlined here. It  also provides guidance for voters. 
Mr. Pipes is director of the Middle East  Forum and Taube distinguished 
visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of  Stanford University.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to