The Catholic World Report
 
    _“Social  Justice” and the New Politics_ 
(http://www.catholicworldreport.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=224:social-justice-and-th
e-new-politics&catid=53:cwr2010&Itemid=71)    
(http://www.catholicworldreport.com/index.php?view=article&catid=53:cwr2010&id=224:social-justice-and-the-
new-politics&tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page=&option=com_content&
Itemid=71)   
(http://www.catholicworldreport.com/index.php?option=com_mailto&tmpl=component&link=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jYXRob2xpY3dvcmxkcmVwb3J0LmNvbS9pbmRleC5
waHA/b3B0aW9uPWNvbV9jb250ZW50JnZpZXc9YXJ0aWNsZSZpZD0yMjQ6c29jaWFsLWp1c3RpY2U
tYW5kLXRoZS1uZXctcG9saXRpY3MmY2F0aWQ9NTM6Y3dyMjAxMCZJdGVtaWQ9NzE=)      
Editorial 
The ground shifts beneath the Catholic left.
By George Neumayr | December 2010 
The phrase “social justice,” when invoked by members of the Catholic  
left, is a euphemism for the agenda of the Democratic Party. “Social  justice” 
refers not to objective principles of justice but to specific  policies of 
Democrats on health care, labor, welfare, and other matters.   
This is why the historic November defeat of Democrats was treated as  such 
troubling news in many chanceries and Catholic university faculty  lounges. 
Worried headlines, of the kind that were nowhere to be found in  the 
Catholic left’s publications after the election of Barack Obama,  suddenly 
appeared, such as Catholic San Francisco’s headline,  “Social Justice Agenda in 
Jeopardy in US.” 
America magazine also sounded an alarm. Steve Schneck, director  of the 
Institute for Policy Research & Catholic Studies at the  Catholic University of 
America, wrote in a piece on its website that the  Church’s “years of 
efforts in America to support public policies that  reflect its moral vision 
were dealt a blow Tuesday evening.”  
The panic was understandable. After all, the Catholic left had invested  a 
great deal in the success of the Democrats and in particular Barack  Obama. 
Many nuns and priests voted for him, with some even openly serving  on his “
Catholic” campaign advisory committee; Catholic college presidents  and 
faculties generously donated to his campaign (Georgetown, out of all  college 
faculties, ranked second in donations); and Catholic public  figures such as 
Doug Kmiec portrayed him as the very embodiment of the  Church’s vision of “
change.” 
After he won the election, the Catholic left’s excitement grew still  more. 
Notre Dame conferred upon him an honorary degree, and bishops such  as 
Archbishop Michael Sheehan of New Mexico, afraid that criticism of  Obama’s 
policies might make Catholics look like the “Amish,” made  rationalizations for 
him. Kmiec, before departing for his ambassadorship  to Malta, burbled 
victoriously that “President Obama has far more in  common with our great faith 
tradition than any political administration in  recent memory.” 
Always late to an awareness that its trendy enthusiasms are no longer  
trendy, the Catholic left simply hadn’t anticipated the wave of anti-Obama  
feeling that swept over the country in 2010. Particularly galling to  members 
of 
the Catholic left is that the Catholic vote contributed to the  backlash 
and appears to be slipping away from the Democrats. In 2008, 55  percent of 
Catholics voted for the Democratic ticket. In 2010, 54 percent  of Catholics 
voted for Republicans.  
Steven Schneck suggested to the US bishops that they discuss at their  next 
meeting the “worrisome implications of excessive partisanship and  
ideological polarization from a Catholic vantage point.” But all this  pouting 
means 
is that Democratic partisans can no longer count on the  Catholic vote.  
A truly Catholic view of “social justice” focuses on the non-negotiable  
issues of the natural law, without which a justly ordered society is  
impossible, and from that “vantage point,” the election results contain  some 
hope 
(though the Republicans should certainly be held accountable in  light of 
it). The US House of Representatives has passed from a  pro-abortion Catholic 
speaker in Nancy Pelosi to a pro-life Catholic  speaker in John Boehner. 
The House added many new pro-lifers and  supporters of traditional marriage to 
its ranks while dropping numerous  supporters of abortion rights and the “
gay” agenda.  
“Pro-choice” Catholic Democrats suffered heavy losses, as did many of  the 
self-styled “pro-life” Democrats who compromised on Obama’s morally  
dubious health care bill. 
The so-called Stupak Democrats didn’t even gain a single election, let  
alone the world, from their compromise. By choosing party power over  
principle, they put themselves into a position to lose both. 
“Pro-choice” Democrats tried hard to retain the Catholic vote through  the 
usual claim that the Democratic Party, despite its support for  abortion 
rights and other violations of the natural law, is “better” on  the Church’s “
social justice concerns” than the Republicans. But this year  that “
seamless garment” unraveled. Voters were in no mood to hear about  “social 
justice
” from Catholic Democrats whose party during its time in  power has 
presided over increasing poverty and unemployment. (Economic  woes also made it 
difficult for Democrats to use the sophistical argument,  which Kmiec dusted 
off in 2008, that Democratic policies reduce the number  of abortions by 
reducing poverty.) 
Archbishop Sheehan feared that his fellow bishops could “isolate” the  
Church by loudly objecting to Obama’s libertine agenda. But it is the  Catholic 
left that looks increasingly isolated in the new politics. The  Catholic 
left’s monopolistic claims about the “common good” and “social  justice” now 
meet with appropriate skepticism, and its equation of  “Catholic concerns” 
with amnesty, carbon taxes, government-run health  care, and so on, is seen 
as insultingly specious. 
True, most of the issues that the new Tea Party-driven politics has  raised 
are prudential matters on which Catholics can disagree. But those  are the 
very issues that the Catholic left seeks to dogmatize even as it  
relativizes the Church’s teachings on the natural law. The irony of this  
inversion of 
priorities is that it has made the Catholic left more  irrelevant in 
American politics than ever. Normally so worried about the  “voice of the 
people,”
 the Catholic left stands exposed by this election  year as woefully out of 
touch with  it.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to