Lost Civilization May Have Existed Beneath the Persian  Gulf
By _Jeanna Bryner_ 
(http://www.livescience.com/php/contactus/author.php?r=jb) , LiveScience 
Managing Editor 
posted: 09 December 2010 01:01 pm ET 
 
 
(http://www.livescience.com/php/multimedia/imagedisplay/img_display.php?s=history&c=news&l=on&pic=persian-gulf-map-101210-02.jpg&cap=This+map+reveals+t
he+Arabian+Peninsula+with+regions+that+were+exposed+as+sea+levels+fell,+and+
so+became+environmental+refuges,+possibly+for+s
ome+of+the+earliest+humans+out+of+Africa.+Credit:+Current+Anthropology.&title=) 
This map reveals the Arabian  Peninsula with regions that were exposed as 
sea levels fell, and so became  environmental refuges, possibly for some of 
the earliest humans out of  Africa. 

Veiled beneath the Persian Gulf, a  once-fertile landmass may have 
supported some of the earliest humans outside  Africa some 75,000 to 100,000 
years 
ago, a new review of _research_ 
(http://www.livescience.com/history/lost-civilization-possibly-existed-beneath-persian-gulf-101209.html#)
  suggests.  
At its peak, the floodplain now below the  Gulf would have been about the 
size of Great Britain, and then shrank as water  began to flood the area. 
Then, about 8,000 years ago, the land would have been  swallowed up by the 
Indian Ocean, the review scientist said.  
The study, which is detailed in the December  issue of the journal Current 
Anthropology, has broad implications for aspects of  human history. For 
instance, scientists have debated over when _early modern humans exited Africa_ 
(http://www.livescience.com/health/070718_africa_origins.html) , with dates 
as early  as 125,000 years ago and as recent as 60,000 years ago (the more 
recent date is  the currently accepted paradigm), according to study 
researcher Jeffrey Rose, an  archaeologist at the University of Birmingham in 
the 
U.K. 
"I think Jeff's theory is bold and  imaginative, and hopefully will shake 
things up," Robert Carter of Oxford  Brookes University in the U.K. told 
LiveScience. "It would completely rewrite  our understanding of the 
out-of-Africa migration. It is far from proven, but  Jeff and others will be 
developing 
research programs to test the  theory." 
 


Viktor Cerny of the Archaeogenetics  Laboratory, the Institute of 
Archaeology, in Prague, called Rose's finding an  "excellent theory," in an 
_e-mail_ 
(http://www.livescience.com/history/lost-civilization-possibly-existed-beneat
h-persian-gulf-101209.html#)  to LiveScience, though he also  points out 
the need for more research to confirm it. 
The findings have sparked discussion among  researchers, including Carter 
and Cerny, who were allowed to provide comments  within the research paper, 
about who exactly the humans were who occupied the  Gulf basin.  
"Given the presence of Neanderthal  communities in the upper reaches of the 
Tigris and Euphrates River, as well as  in the eastern Mediterranean 
region, this may very well have been the contact  zone between moderns and 
Neanderthals," Rose told LiveScience. In fact, recent  evidence from the 
sequencing 
of the Neanderthal genome suggests interbreeding,  meaning _we are part 
caveman_ 
(http://www.livescience.com/history/neanderthal-genome-mating-100506.html) . 
Watery  refuge 
The Gulf Oasis would have been a shallow  inland basin exposed from about 
75,000 years ago until 8,000 years ago, forming  the southern tip of the 
_Fertile Crescent_ (http://www.livescience.com/history/top10_iraq_battles.html) 
, according to historical sea-level  records.  
And it would have been an ideal refuge from  the harsh deserts surrounding 
it, with fresh water supplied by the Tigris,  Euphrates, Karun and Wadi 
Baton Rivers, as well as by upwelling springs, Rose  said. And during the last 
ice age when conditions were at their driest, this  basin would've been at 
its largest.  
In fact, in recent years, archaeologists have  turned up evidence of a wave 
of human settlements along the shores of the Gulf  dating to about 7,500 
years ago.  
"Where before there had been but a handful of  scattered hunting camps, 
suddenly, over 60 new archaeological sites appear  virtually overnight," Rose 
said. "These settlements boast well-built, permanent  stone houses, 
long-distance trade networks, elaborately decorated pottery,  domesticated 
animals, 
and even evidence for one of the oldest boats in the  world."  
Rather than quickly evolving settlements,  Rose thinks precursor 
populations did exist but have remained hidden beneath the  Gulf. [_History's 
Most 
Overlooked Mysteries_ (http://www.liv
escience.com/history/top10_history_mysteries.html) ] 
"Perhaps it is no coincidence that the  founding of such remarkably well 
developed communities along the shoreline  corresponds with the flooding of 
the _Persian Gulf_ 
(http://www.livescience.com/history/lost-civilization-possibly-existed-beneath-persian-gulf-101209.html#)
  basin around 8,000 years 
ago,"  Rose said. "These new colonists may have come from the heart of the 
Gulf,  displaced by rising water levels that plunged the once fertile landscape 
beneath  the waters of the Indian Ocean." 
Ironclad  case? 
The most definitive evidence of these human  camps in the Gulf comes from a 
new archaeological site called Jebel Faya 1  within the Gulf basin that was 
discovered four years ago. There, Hans-Peter  Uerpmann of the University of 
Tubingen in Germany found three different  Paleolithic settlements 
occurring from about 125,000 to 25,000 years ago. That  and other 
archaeological 
sites, Rose said, indicate "that early human groups  were living around the 
Gulf basin throughout the Late Pleistocene."  
To make an ironclad case for such human  occupation during the Paleolithic, 
or early Stone Age, of the _now-submerged landmass_ 
(http://www.livescience.com/history/091009-atlantis-tsunami.html) , Rose said 
scientists would need 
 to find any evidence of stone tools scattered under the Gulf. "As for the  
Neolithic, it would be wonderful to find some evidence for human-built  
structures," dated to that time period in the Gulf, Rose said. 
Carter said in order to make for a solid  case, "we would need to find a 
submerged site, and excavate it underwater. This  would likely only happen as 
the culmination of years of survey in carefully  selected areas." 
Cerny said a sealed-tight case could be made  with "some fossils of the 
anatomically modern humans some 100,000 years old  found in South Arabia." 
And there's a hint of mythology here, too,  Rose pointed out. "Nearly every 
civilization living in southern Mesopotamia has  told some form of the 
flood myth. While the names might change, the content and  structure are 
consistent from 2,500 B.C. to the Genesis account to the Qur'anic  version," 
Rose 
said.  
Perhaps evidence beneath the Gulf? "If it  looks like a duck, and quacks 
like a duck, we have at least to consider the  possibility that we have a 
small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our  hands," said Rose, quoting 
Douglas Adams.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to