Thoughtful article, as you'd expect from Douthat. But he is reluctant to  
say the obvious.
Christians don't know how to deal with the "Roman Empire" that they now  
live in,
have no strategy for dealing with it beyond appeals to verities from the  
1950s
which are not verities to at least a plurality and maybe a majority, and 
don't know what to do that has any chance of success in society.
As a result, even "conservative" Christians are more and more
making serious compromises with "Roman" society.
OK, am I wrong ?  Show me the evidence.
 
Billy
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
NYTimes
 
A Tough Season for Believers   
By _ROSS DOUTHAT_ 
(http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/rossdouthat/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
 
Published: December 19, 2010
 
 
 
 
(http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/opinion&pos=Frame4A&sn2=f8475720/9aad5d74&sn1=b298ed6f/e40
60107&camp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225563c_nyt5&ad=Tree_120x60&goto=http:/
/www.foxsearchlight.com/thetreeoflife) 



 
Christmas is hard for everyone. But it’s particularly hard for people who  
actually believe in it. 

 
In a sense, of course, there’s no better time to be a Christian than the  
first 25 days of December. But this is also the season when American 
Christians  can feel most embattled. Their piety is overshadowed by materialist 
ticky-tack.  Their great feast is compromised by Christmukkwanzaa 
multiculturalism. And the  once-a-year churchgoers crowding the pews beside 
them are a 
reminder of how many  Americans regard religion as just another form of 
midwinter entertainment,  wedged in between “The Nutcracker” and “Miracle on 
34th 
Street.”  
These anxieties can be overdrawn, and they’re frequently turned to cynical  
purposes. (Think of the annual “war on Christmas” drumbeat, or last week’s 
 complaints from Republican senators about the supposed “sacrilege” of 
keeping  Congress in session through the holiday.) But they also reflect the 
peculiar and  complicated status of Christian faith in American life. 
Depending on the angle  you take, Christianity is either dominant or under 
siege, 
ubiquitous or  marginal, the strongest religion in the country or a waning and 
increasingly  archaic faith.  
Happily, for those who need a last-minute gift for the anxious Christian in 
 their life, the year just past featured two thick, impressive books that 
wrestle  with exactly these complexities.  
The first is “_American Grace_ 
(http://books.simonandschuster.com/American-Grace/David-E-Campbell/9781416566717)
 ,” co-written by Harvard’s Robert 
Putnam  (of “Bowling Alone” fame) and Notre Dame’s David Campbell, which 
examines the  role that religion plays in binding up the nation’s social 
fabric. 
Over all,  they argue, our society reaps enormous benefits from religious 
engagement, while  suffering from few of the potential downsides. Widespread 
churchgoing seems to  make Americans more altruistic and more engaged with 
their communities, more  likely to volunteer and more inclined to give to 
secular and religious  charities. Yet at the same time, thanks to Americans’ 
ever-increasing tolerance,  we’ve been spared the kind of sectarian conflict 
that often accompanies  religious zeal.  
But for Christians, this sunny story has a dark side. Religious faith looks 
 more socially beneficial to America than ever, but the institutional  
Christianity that’s historically generated most of those benefits seems to be  
gradually losing its appeal.  
In the last 50 years, the Christian churches have undergone what “American  
Grace” describes as a shock and two aftershocks. The initial earthquake was 
the  cultural revolution of the 1960s, which undercut religious authority 
as it did  all authority, while dealing a particular blow to Christian sexual 
ethics. The  first aftershock was the rise of religious conservatism, and 
particularly  evangelical faith, as a backlash against the cultural revolution
’s excesses. But  now we’re living through the second aftershock, a 
backlash to that backlash — a  revolt against the association between Christian 
faith and conservative  politics, Putnam and Campbell argue, in which millions 
of Americans (younger  Americans, especially) may be abandoning organized 
Christianity altogether.  
Their argument is complemented by the University of Virginia sociologist  
James Davison Hunter’s “_To Change the World_ 
(http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/ReligionTheology/SociologyofReligion/?view=usa&ci=9780199730
803) ,” an often withering account of  recent Christian attempts to 
influence American politics and society. Having  popularized the term “culture 
war”
 two decades ago, Hunter now argues that the  “war” footing has led 
American Christians into a cul-de-sac. It has encouraged  both conservative and 
liberal believers to frame their mission primarily in  terms of conflict, and 
to express themselves almost exclusively in the “language  of loss, 
disappointment, anger, antipathy, resentment and desire for conquest.”  
Thanks in part to this bunker mentality, American Christianity has become  
what Hunter calls a “weak culture” — one that mobilizes but doesn’t 
convert,  alienates rather than seduces, and looks backward toward a lost past 
instead of  forward to a vibrant future. In spite of their numerical strength 
and reserves  of social capital, he argues, the Christian churches are mainly 
influential only  in the “peripheral areas” of our common life. In the 
commanding heights of  culture, Christianity punches way below its weight.  
Putnam and Campbell are quantitative, liberal, and upbeat; Hunter is  
qualitative, conservative and conflicted. But both books come around to a  
similar argument: this month’s ubiquitous carols and crèches notwithstanding,  
believing Christians are no longer what they once were — an overwhelming  
majority in a self-consciously Christian nation. The question is whether they  
can become a creative and attractive minority in a different sort of culture,  
where they’re competing not only with rival faiths but with a host of  
pseudo-Christian spiritualities, and where the idea of a single religious truth 
 
seems increasingly passé.  
Or to put it another way, Christians need to find a way to thrive in a  
society that looks less and less like any sort of Christendom — and more and  
more like the diverse and complicated Roman Empire where their religion had 
its  beginning, 2,000 years ago this week. 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to