Or two million years.
 
Bet they have good pot in Texas, but if you ever get the chance
try some Maui Wowie some time. 
 
Just a suggestion
 
Billy                                
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
message dated 12/23/2010 3:47:51 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

I'm actually in favor of this. 

But never in  a million years would I have thought that Pat Robertson would 
say that.  

David 

  _   
 
"There  is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no 
virtue in  advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring" and 
"sensitive"  because he wants to expand the government's charitable programs is 
merely  saying that he's willing to try to do good with other people's 
money. Well,  who isn't? And a voter who takes pride in supporting such 
programs 
is telling  us that he'll do good with his own money -- if a gun is held to 
his  head."--P. J.  O'Rourke


On 12/23/2010 1:59 PM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  
Pat Robertson: Decriminalize Marijuana  
(Yes, THAT Pat Robertson)
 
 
Politics Daily / Dec 23, 2010
David Gibson
 
 
So, California voters defeat a ballot effort to legalize medical  marijuana 
and now Pat Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition and  leader of 
the religious right, is advocating the repeal of criminal  penalties for 
possessing small quantities of pot? 

Something seems  wrong with this picture, but we've got _the video_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQi7A5MW2kQ&feature=player_embedded)  to prove 
it:  
On his Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) show the other day, Robertson  
was talking about his long experience in prison ministry and the problem of  
locking up small-time offenders who then cost taxpayers to feed and house  
them. Which led to this monologue:


We're locking up people that take a couple of puffs of marijuana  and the 
next thing you know they've got 10 years -- they've got mandatory  sentences 
and these judges, they throw up their hand and say "What can we  do? It's 
mandatory sentences." We've got to take a look at what we're  considering 
crimes, and that's one of 'em. I mean, I'm not exactly for the  use of drugs, 
don't get me wrong. But I just believe criminalizing  marijuana, criminalizing 
the possession of just a few ounces of pot, and  that kind of thing, I mean 
it's costing us a fortune, and it's ruining  young people. The young people 
go into prisons, they go in as youths, and  they come out as hardened 
criminals, and it's not a good  thing.


 
Drug reformers are shocked but of course celebrating, and are wondering  if 
this augurs a shift in conservative thinking on the war on drugs.  

"I suspect that Robertson has begun to realize that the War on Drugs  is 
bad for family values," Ilya Somin _writes_ 
(http://volokh.com/2010/12/23/where-pat-robertson-and-i-agree/)  at The Volokh  
Conspiracy, a legal blog. "It 
will take a lot of good works to make up for  all the ridiculous and 
offensive things that Robertson has said over the  years. But helping to end 
the 
War on Drugs would be a good start.

"As  the recent defeat of California's Proposition 19 shows, the opposition 
of  social conservatives is one of the biggest political obstacles to 
curtailing  drug prohibition. Hopefully, more conservatives will come to the 
same 
 realization as Robertson and, before him, the far more intellectually  
respectable William F. Buckley."

Pete Guither at _DrugWarRant.com_ 
(http://www.drugwarrant.com/2010/12/pat-robertson-voice-of-sanity-in-the-drug-war/)
  dares  to hope "that a powerful 
coalition of Democratic voters, principled  conservatives, libertarians . . 
. and Teapot Partiers" could change the  political dynamic. "Not bad." 

But maybe not realistic. Robertson  just doesn't have that much pull with 
influential social conservatives  anymore, and tends to be viewed as a kindly 
old uncle who can go on a little  too long once he gets the microphone. 

Then again, who knows? Maybe  he'll now come out for the other great 
libertarian cause, gay marriage. He'd  have the younger generation of 
evangelicals 
supporting him on that  one.


-- 




-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to