Re :  The Following Article
 
What is especially interesting in this development is that, I think for the 
 first time,
at least some elements of the Left are co-operating with the Right in  
opposition
to Islam in Europe. Of course, to be expected,  other elements of the  Left 
are
strongly opposed, all of which has meaning.
 
In an unexpected way, the anti-Islam movement has  --at least for  now--
something of a Radical Centrist character. You are free to speculate  about
whether this Left / Right rapproachement will last. Personally,  it  seems 
unstable.
After all, the contemporary Left is more than a little anti-Semitic and  
clearly
is anti-Zionist in many cases. The Right is increasingly, as in the United  
States,
pro-Israel even when disagreeing with particular Israeli policies.  
Moreover, there
are a good number of other issues where Left and Right are at  loggerheads.
Especially economic policy and social matters such as the status of  
homosexuals.
Nonetheless, it says something important that some Leftists are now in  
alliance
with a major part of the European Right.
 
The question seems to be this :  Will part of the  Left re-invent itself ?
Probably  the  dominant  Left will not do any such thing, it  is viscerally 
neo-Communist
or Marxist enough not to consider changing its stripes. But there is more  
to the story.
There also are non-Marxist traditions on the Left, like Saint-Simonianism  
and
Christian-inspired variants, so a minority of the Left could sheer  off.
 
It does not appear that the Right needs to remake its philosophy as  much
as does the Left, and in cases, only minimally. Yet, it could turn out  that
elements of the Right will seize on this "coming together" to modify a  
number
of its "other" policies in a more Leftward direction. The Right might be  
more willing 
to make environmental issues their own, for instance, and maybe other  
things as well.
 
There clearly is a long way to go before anything like a European version  
of 
Radical Centrism comes into existence; and this may never happen. Yet, here 
 is
an example of what could develop.  Who would have thought that  opposition 
to Islam
could serve as a catalyst for Left / Right dialogue and movement away from  
strict
partisanship ? And it is crucial to recognize the obvious  --this  
opposition , in all likelihood, 
will only increase in the years ahead.
 
The reason is simple : Immigration into Europe by Muslim  multitudes show 
no signs
of slowing down. France already is about 10 % Muslim, with Germany and  
Britain 
at about half that figure. While the Scandinavian countries remain  
predominantly
Nordic, this is not true any longer in the major cities, with Malmo and  
Oslo and
Helsinki each with large Muslim minorities. The same is true in the Low  
Countries,
with Spain having a unique set of problems with the rise of Muslim  
populations there
seeking to restore Islamic rule. And so forth in virtually all other  
nations on the continent.
 
The only possibilities for diffusing the problem would seem to be mass  
return migration
on the part of Muslims, which isn't going to happen, or massive  
deconversion from
orthodox forms of Islam to something else, anything from Sufism to Atheism, 
 and this 
also appears to be highly improbable, at least if this is to discuss  
significant numbers
of people. Which is to say, there will continue to be motivation to oppose  
Islam
on the part of more and more Europeans.
 
It is worth pointing out that, while there certainly are differences,  
especially the
commitment of Radical Centrists to democracy, original Fascism was a hybrid 
 political
philosophy of Left and Right. Things did not stay that way, of course, but  
throughout
the 1920s the Italians retained their original Fascist character, to the  
extent that the
movement had its champions in the United States including no less than  
Marcus Garvey,
the "Negro" advocate of Civil Rights and of decolonialism. The  
anti-Semitism and
racism of the Nazis, who joined with Italy in alliance, changed the  
character of Fascism
by the later 1930s, needless to say, but let us not forget its  beginnings.
 
In other words, the same thing could happen again, this time without  
Hitler.
 
Think of what that might mean. 
 
 
Billy Rojas

 
 
 
 
============================================================
 
 
 
A European anti-Islam movement  grows

Paris conference brings together speakers from across  Europe to rail 
against the dangers of Islamization
 
By _Mildrade  Cherfils_ (http://www.globalpost.com/bio/mildrade-cherfils)  
- GlobalPost 
Published: January 2, 2011
 
PARIS, France — Gerard Brazon was uneasy. Something "unhealthy" and  
"dishonest" was afoot in France. It was Islam, decided the 58-year-old retired  
economic consultant turned blogger. And he was not alone in his concern. 
On Dec. 18, Brazon joined hundreds of like-minded people to hear a 
procession  of speakers from countries such as Switzerland, Austria, Belgium 
and the 
United  States detail the dangers of Islam in Europe, notably the religion’
s fundamental  incompatibility with modern Western society, many of them 
said. 
“Increasingly, freedom of religion is overtaking individual freedom,” said 
 Brazon at the close of the first _International  Conference on the 
Islamization of Our Countries_ 
(http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/18-decembre-2010-Assises-internationales-sur-lislamisation/133304180056016)
 , 
lamenting the erosion of  secular France. 
The conference, held under the gaze of police and private security, was 
part  revival preaching to the converted and part political drive to gather 
steam  ahead of the French presidential campaign season. But for Brazon and 
others, it  was also a “point of departure.” Organizers hailed the event as 
the birth of “a  resistance movement against European Islamization.” 
“Maybe you will have been the starting point of something in France and in  
Europe,” said Oskar Freysinger, the headline speaker, who stoked the crowd’
s  fervor after making a dramatic entrance surrounded by bodyguards wearing 
dark  sunglasses, low-slung caps and black scarves covering their faces. As 
he  entered, the crowd chanted his name. 
 
 
 
 





Freysinger, a member of the Swiss People’s Party, is best known for his  
involvement last year in a successful _campaign  against the construction of 
minarets_ (http://www.globalpost.com/video/commerce/091210/location-geneva)  
in Switzerland, a debate that rages on  across Europe. His speech was a 
mixture of gibes against soft-on-immigration  liberals and calls for “
revolution." 
“What’s at stake is your mortal soul,” Freysinger told the crowd. 
Organizers estimated that more than 1,000 people paid the 10 euro ($13)  
entrance fee to attend. Freysinger later called the audience “a true microcosm 
 of society,” as he marveled at its diversity: Marxists, feminists, 
Socialists  and members of the UMP, the ruling French right party. 
What set the gathering apart was the fact that it brought people together  
from across borders around a single issue, said a lawyer for an anti-racism  
organization that had lobbied for the event’s cancellation. 
Bernard Schmid, of the Movement Against Racism and for Friendship Between  
Peoples (MRAP), said far-right political groups that are anti-immigrant or  
anti-Semitic or anti-Roma have existed previously, citing groups in 
countries  including the _Netherlands_ 
(http://www.globalpost.com/notebook/benelux/100304/dutch-elections-geert-wilders)
 ,  _Germany_ 
(http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/germany/101028/germany-immigration-multiculturalism)
   and 
_Sweden_ 
(http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/europe/101215/sweden-stockholm-terrorist-attack-extreme-right)
 ,  but if they joined forces it would be a new 
phenomenon. 
“There is an identification of one common enemy,” Schmid said. “What is 
new  is the common work, not the ideological profile.” 
In early January, MRAP plans to file lawsuits accusing some of the event's  
speakers of inciting racial hatred. As proof, the organization will submit  
recordings of the proceedings, which were broadcast live on the internet. 
During  the event, organizers told the crowd that some 50,000 people had 
watched online,  eliciting wild applause. The final tally put that number above 
240,000. 
One speaker, Elisabeth Wolff of Austria, drew a standing ovation after  
describing how she was charged with “incitement to hatred” following a private 
 seminar during which she quoted religious texts, including the Koran. 
“I was not silenced, nor will they ever succeed in silencing me,” Wolff 
said  to another stirring round of applause. She remarked that her case was 
not about  the law but a political trial “intended to silence someone who 
speaks out  against the barbaric nature of sharia law.” 
“When there are enough Muslims living in Europe — and it doesn’t have to 
be a  majority of the population, just somewhere around 15 or 20 percent — we 
will be  living under Islamic law, and not the laws that presently govern 
us,” she told  the audience. 
Islam and mosques are ideas “that have nothing to do with Europe,” said 
Bruno  Vendoire, a spokesman for Bloc Identitaire, the political group that 
organized  the event and is vying to get a candidate on the 2012 presidential 
ballot. “We  have our civilization to preserve and our civilization is 
Greco-Latin.” 
Vendoire said the gathering was intended to build on the "sausage and wine" 
 parties the group held in June in response to Muslims praying in the 
streets in  some Parisian neighborhoods because of overflowing mosques. Earlier 
this month,  Marine Le Pen, the vice-president of the National Front party, 
compared those  prayers to a World War II occupation, prompting MRAP to 
announce it would file  suit. 
For Brazon, the issues go beyond prayer in the streets to more basic 
changes  in France. He complains of neighborhoods where Africans are in the 
majority and  he doesn't see anyone who looks like him. He says there are 
suburbs 
where young,  white French men must assimilate to the speech and dress 
styles of young, Arab  men, where women are not free to decide for themselves 
whether or not to wear a  veil. 
“I like to feel like a foreigner when I’m in a foreign country,” said 
Brazon.  “When you start to feel foreign in your own country, you start to ask  
questions.”

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to