Pew Forum
 
 
Faith on  the Hill
The  Religious Composition of the 112th Congress
ANALYSIS  January 5,  2011 

 
 
Many analysts described the  November 2010 midterm elections as a sea 
change, with Republicans taking control  of the U.S. House of Representatives 
and 
narrowing the Democratic majority in  the Senate. But this political 
overhaul appears to have had little effect on the  religious composition of 
Congress, which is similar to the religious makeup of  the previous Congress 
and 
of the nation, according to an analysis by the Pew  Research Center’s Forum 
on Religion & Public Life.

 
The 112th Congress, like the U.S. public, is majority Protestant and about 
a  quarter Catholic. Baptists and Methodists are the largest Protestant  
denominations in the new Congress, just as they are in the country as a  whole. 
 
A few of the country’s smaller religious groups, including Episcopalians,  
Presbyterians and Jews, have greater numerical representation in Congress 
than  in the general population. Some others, including Buddhists and Muslims, 
are  represented in Congress in roughly equal proportion to their numbers 
in the  adult U.S. population. And some small religious groups, such as 
Hindus and  Jehovah’s Witnesses, are not represented at all in Congress.  
Perhaps the greatest disparity between the religious makeup  of Congress 
and the people it represents, however, is in the percentage of the  
unaffiliated – those who describe their religion as atheist, agnostic or  
“nothing in 
particular.” According to information gathered by CQ Roll Call and  the Pew 
Forum, no members of Congress say they are unaffiliated. By contrast,  
about one-sixth of U.S. adults (16%) are not affiliated with any particular  
faith. Only six members of the 112th Congress (about 1%) do not specify a  
religious affiliation, which is similar to the percentage of the public that  
says they don’t know or refuses to specify their faith._1_ 
(http://pewforum.org/Government/Faith-on-the-Hill--The-Religious-Composition-of-the-112th-Congre
ss.aspx#ftn1)  
These findings are based on a comparison of the religious affiliations of  
members of the new Congress with data on the U.S. public from the _U.S. 
Religious  Landscape Survey_ (http://religions.pewforum.org/) , conducted by 
the 
Pew Forum in 2007 among more  than 35,000 U.S. adults. CQ Roll Call 
gathered information on the religious  affiliations of members of Congress 
through 
questionnaires and follow-up phone  calls to members’ offices. The Pew Forum 
supplemented that information with an  extensive review of media reports on 
candidates in 2010 House and Senate races.  It should be noted, however, 
that there is an important difference between a  confidential telephone survey 
of a sample of U.S. adults and media inquiries  about the religious 
identification of an elected official or candidate. Media  inquiries may find 
fewer 
“unaffiliated” people because those inquiries are more  public. 
The New, 112th Congress
Of the 535 members of the new Congress, 304 – or 57% – are Protestants, 
which  is slightly higher than the share of Protestants in the U.S. adult 
population  (51%). Compared with the previous Congress, the 112th Congress has 
added 12  Protestants, an increase of roughly two percentage points.  
Baptists remain the largest Protestant denominational family in Congress,  
essentially unchanged from the 111th Congress, though there are somewhat 
fewer  self-described Baptists on Capitol Hill (13%) than in the national 
population  (17%). Methodists have declined slightly in their proportion of 
Congress,  dropping by six members, or about one percentage point. Nonetheless, 
Methodists  still comprise a larger share of Congress (10%) than of the 
public (6%). 
Some other Protestant groups also are overrepresented in Congress  relative 
to their numbers in the general population. For instance, while fewer  than 
2% of American adults identify themselves as Episcopalians, about 8% of  
Congress is affiliated with the Episcopal Church. In addition, 8% of Congress 
is  Presbyterian, about three times the percentage of American adults who 
say they  are Presbyterians (3%). 
Protestants who do not specify a particular denomination grew the most from 
 the 111th to the 112th Congress, increasing their ranks by 19 members, to 
a  total of 58. They now comprise 11% of Congress, up from 7% two years ago. 
The  proportion of unspecified Protestants is nearly as high among 
incumbents (10%)  as among newly elected members (13%). It is unclear whether 
any of 
these  unspecified Protestants are affiliated with nondenominational 
churches; just two  members of the 112th Congress specify that they belong to 
nondenominational  Protestant churches. 
If Protestants are not counted together but as separate denominations, then 
 Catholics are the largest religious group in the 112th Congress, with 156  
members. Compared with the previous Congress, their ranks have thinned by 
five  members. Still, Catholics comprise about 29% of the House and Senate, 
compared  with about one-quarter of the U.S. adult population (24%). 
Jews, who make up about 2% of the U.S. adult population, account for 7% of  
Congress as a whole and 12% of the Senate. However, there are six fewer 
Jewish  members in the 112th Congress than there were in the 111th, a  
one-percentage-point decline. Mormons also make up about 2% of the U.S. public  
and 
a slightly larger portion of Congress (nearly 3%). That figure is about the  
same as in the previous Congress; there are 15 Mormons in the 112th 
Congress,  one more than previously.  
Some other small religious groups are about as numerically well-represented 
 on Capitol Hill as in the general population. Muslims, who account for 
0.6% of  the U.S. adult population, make up 0.4% of Congress, while Buddhists 
make up  0.7% of the U.S. adult population and 0.6% of Congress. There are no 
Jehovah’s  Witnesses, Hindus or people who practice other world religions 
in Congress;  these groups each have a small presence (less than 1%) in the 
U.S. population as  a whole. 
 
As previously mentioned, members of Congress are more likely than the 
public  overall to affiliate with any particular religion. Six members of the 
new 
 Congress (about 1%) do not specify a religious affiliation, and no members 
 describe themselves as unaffiliated. By comparison, about one-sixth of the 
 American public (16%) falls into the unaffiliated category, with another 
1%  saying they don’t know or refusing to specify. The low number of 
religiously  unaffiliated elected officials is perhaps not surprising given 
Americans
’  attitudes toward religion and politics. According to a summer 2010 
survey by the  Pew Forum and the Pew Research Center for the People & the 
Press, 
61% of  Americans say it is important for members of Congress to have strong 
religious  beliefs. This view is expressed by eight-in-ten white 
evangelical Protestants  (83%); seven-in-ten black Protestants (71%); and at 
least 
six-in-ten white  mainline Protestants (64%), white Catholics (66%) and 
Hispanic Catholics (61%).  Even among self-identified atheists and agnostics, 
15% 
say it is important for  members of Congress to have strong religious 
beliefs. 
 
Differences Between Chambers, Parties and Newly Elected/Incumbents
Several religious groups are represented in roughly equal proportions in 
both  houses of Congress, including Protestants as a whole (57% of the House, 
56% of  the Senate) as well as denominational families such as Methodists 
(9% in the  House, 11% in the Senate) and Lutherans (5% in the House, 4% in 
the Senate).  
However, a few religious groups continue to have lopsided representation in 
 one chamber or the other. For example, Jews make up 12% of the new Senate 
but 6%  of the House. Likewise, Mormons make up 5% of the Senate and 2% of 
the House.  Presbyterians also make up twice as much of the Senate as the 
House (14% vs.  7%). Baptists, on the other hand, are more numerous in the 
House (14%) than in  the Senate (8%), as are Episcopalians (9% vs.  4%).

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to