Ernie :
The best I can tell you is that the word "Socialism" was  invented by 
Robert Owen
even though the concept was first put together by Saint-Simon a few years  
earlier.
 
But Owen actually lived in the USA for a couple of yeas in the 1820s, at a  
community
called "New Harmony," in Indiana.  I have seen the site, and there  also is 
a statue of 
Paul Tillich in the vicinity since he spent time there also, much  later of 
course,
for something only remotely related. New Harmony was supposed to  become
an ideal community that would show the way to a  better future for  all.
So, best I can figure, his word coinage was adopted thereafter , 
not only by his followers, but by others with similar ideas.
 
Not sure when, exactly, the word Socialism became normative, but as  late
as the late 19th c some people used the word ( lower case )  "communistic."
That word was in common currency also in Europe and Marx adopted it,
also this general era of history,  like he adopted  the word  Socialism, 
and redefined it for his own purposes.
 
Common theme in all "Socialist" movements was dignity of labor and the need 
 for
fairness in working conditions and remuneration. Along with that went any  
number
of related issues, depending on which group you are talking about. 
 
The early 20th century Socialists also had roots in the US labor  movement
independent of Europe, dating back to the first attempts to organize
New England mill workers in the water wheel era, also around the  1820s.
That didn't, pan out either, but industrialization continued and the  need
for better conditions for labor only grew with time
 
Distrust of capitalism
Definitely a factor from the beginning, with the caveat that at least   the 
early 
Socialists were open to the efforts of philanthropic Capitalists. That was  
what
Owen was, for example. Of course, he was also a free  thinker and had  ideas
for wealth egalitarianism which never worked out, and no sense for clash of 
 egos,
so New Harmony fell apart. More realistic, but also fell apart , was a  
similar
experiment in California , called Kaweah,  in the early 20th  c.
 
Valuing community responsibility more than  individual rights
This is too strong but, yes, the general  idea, and it was  attached to the
movement from very early. Why I like Saint-Simonianism is that, coming at  
the
very beginning, it was hybrid by necessity and in it you get community  plus
individual rights in rough balance. In terms of labor, the S-Simonian  view
was what we now would call a profit sharing or stakeholder system.
 
Since it was part Capitalist, S-Simonianism came to the US in the form  of
a plan for a joint stock company based on selling stock to investors in  
railroads
with the idea being that workers would own a  part of  everything.
It was partly modeled on a similar plan under Louis Napoleon III
which, in France, was  big success.  LN III was more-or-less  
Saint-Simonian.
at least for the first decade or so of his rule.
 
Alas, in America a variety of swindlers got involved and Credit  Mobilier,
as it was called, went bust and that ended Saint-Simonianism in  America.
 
Until rediscovered  by Billy Rojas and  preached to Radical  Centrists
year after year, whether or not anyone liked to listen. 
Not the Credit Mobilier stuff, just the good stuff. 
 
 
Billy  
 
 
 
==================================================
 
 
 
 
message dated 1/19/2011 10:59:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:
 
Hi  Billy,

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 15, 2011, at 11:03,  [email protected] wrote:

> Socialism. n. political movement with  various sub-categories derived from
> several sources which, by the  first years of the 20th century,  has 
coalesced
> into a loose  alliance increasingly influenced by the ideas of Karl Marx.
> This entry  concerns Socialism in the United States only.

A nice description, but  not my idea of a definition. What themes tied them 
together, or at least  inspired them to choose that name? Distrust of 
capitalism? Valuing community  responsibility more than individual rights? 
Limits 
on private  property?

E
>  

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to