Historical illiteracy is a wonderful thing.
Works like a charm for politicians--
 
 
WPost
06/06/2011 
 
Sarah Palin’s midnight ride, twice over
By Glenn Kessler
 
“We saw where Paul Revere hung out as a teenager, which was  something new 
to learn. He who warned, uh, the British that they weren’t  going to be 
taking away our arms, uh, by ringing those bells and  making sure as he’s 
riding 
his horse through town to send those warning shots  and bells that we were 
going to be secure and we were going to be free and we  were going to be 
armed.”  
— Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, June 2 
"You know what? I didn’t mess up about Paul Revere. Here is what  Paul 
Revere did. He warned the Americans that the British were coming, the  British 
were coming, and they were going to try to take our arms and we got to  make 
sure that we were protecting ourselves and shoring up all of our  
ammunitions and our firearms so that they couldn’t take it. But remember that  
the 
British had already been there, many soldiers for seven years in that area.  
And part of Paul Revere’s ride — and it wasn’t just one ride — he was a 
courier,  he was a messenger. Part of his ride was to warn the British that 
were 
already  there. That, hey, you’re not going to succeed. You’re not going 
to take American  arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, 
individual, private  militia that we have. He did warn the British. And in 
a shout-out, gotcha type  of question that was asked of me, I answered 
candidly. And I know my American  history.”  
— Palin, June 5 
Lots of readers have asked us to weigh in on this little kerfuffle 
regarding  Paul Revere’s 1775 ride, so we will do a quick disentanglement of  
Palin’
s words. Over the course of two statements, the former Alaska  governor got 
some history wrong and some history right, but she presented it in  such a 
free-form manner that it left her the butt of jokes and blogosphere  
commentary. So let’s take a tour through her language and compare it with the  
historical facts. 
Palin, Take One 

“He who warned, uh, the British that they weren’t going to be  taking away 
our arms . . . ”  
Paul Revere is best known for warning prominent colonists (who were  still 
technically British citizens) that British troops were coming to arrest  
them. As _the Web site of the Paul Revere House_ 
(http://paulreverehouse.org/ride/real.html)  says: “On the  evening of April 
18, 1775, Paul Revere was 
sent for by Dr. Joseph Warren and  instructed to ride to Lexington, 
Massachusetts, to warn Samuel Adams and John  Hancock that British troops were 
marching 
to arrest them.” 
 (http://paulreverehouse.org/ride/real.html) However, to be charitable to 
Palin, later that evening, Revere  was arrested by a British patrol. In Revere
’s _own account of the incident_ 
(http://www.masshist.org/database/img-viewer.php?item_id=99&img_step=1&tpc=&pid=&mode=transcript&tpc=&pid=#page1)
 ,  
written in 1798, he said he warned that 500 Americans militiamen would be  
awaiting them: “I told him; and added, that their troops had  catched aground 
in passing the River, and that There would be five hundred  Americans there 
in a short time, for I had alarmed the Country all the  way up.” 
Still, it seems a stretch to believe that Palin was focusing on this  
relatively obscure part of the Revere story, rather than his midnight ride (“He 
 
who warned, uh, the British . . . ”). Palin also seems to suggest that 
Revere’s  midnight ride was mostly in defense of the as-yet-unwritten _Second 
Amendment of the U.S.  Constitution_ 
(http://topics.law.cornell.edu/constitution/second_amendment) . That’s not 
right. 
“. . . ringing those bells and making sure as he’s riding his horse  
through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be  
secure and we were going to be free and we were going to be armed.”  
This is wrong. Revere did not use bells and warning shots, though others 
may  have. Revere was supposed to be quiet. He famously used two lanterns,  “
indicating that troops would row ‘by sea’ across the Charles River to  
Cambridge, rather than marching ‘by land’ out Boston Neck,” according to the 
_Paul Revere House_ (http://paulreverehouse.org/ride/real.html) . “As he 
approached the house where  Adams and Hancock were staying, a sentry asked that 
he 
not make so much noise.  ‘Noise!’ cried Revere, ‘You’ll have noise enough 
before long. The regulars are  coming out!’ ” 

 (http://paulreverehouse.org/ride/real.html) Palin, Take Two 

“He warned the Americans that the British were coming, the British were  
coming, and they were going to try to take our arms and we got to make sure 
that  we were protecting ourselves and shoring up all of our ammunitions and 
our  firearms so that they couldn’t take it.”  
In her second telling, Palin focuses on the central part of the Paul  
Revere story and finally gets correct the line that every schoolchild is taught 
 —
 “The British are coming!” 
“Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That,  
hey, you're not going to succeed. You're not going to take American arms. You 
 are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private 
militia  that we have. He did warn the British.”  
It does not appear that Revere planned to get arrested. In fact, Revere’s 
own  account demonstrates that he took great care to avoid the British: 
“I saw two men on Horse back, under a Tree. 
When I got  near them, I discovered they were British officer. 
One tryed to git a  head of Me, & the other to take me. I turned  my Horse 
very quick,  & Galloped towards Charlestown neck, and then pushed  for the 
Medford Road. The one who chased 
me, endeavoring to  Cut me off, got into a Clay pond, near where the new 
Tavern is  now built. I got clear of him.”
But Revere certainly made the most of it when he was arrested,  inflating 
the number of colonists who had weapons in an apparent effort to  frighten 
the British soldiers. So Palin is correct to say that he warned the  British, 
but not that it was part of his original mission. She seems to be  recasting 
her earlier comment to avoid admitting that she made a mistake. 
“And in a shout-out, gotcha type of question that was asked of  me, I 
answered candidly. And I know my American history.”  
The actual “gotcha question” was rather benign: “What have you seen so far 
 today, and what are you going to take away from your  visit?”

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to