If you ever come across that list, I'd really like to see it.
Sounds good to me.
 
Billy
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
message dated 6/6/2011 10:10:12 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

The Lutheran Campus Pastor at Aggieland had a wall  hanging of First 
Hezekiah chapter 13, including such gems as "Thou shalt not  Committee." 

David

  _   
 
"There  is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no 
virtue in  advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring" and 
"sensitive"  because he wants to expand the government's charitable programs is 
merely  saying that he's willing to try to do good with other people's 
money. Well,  who isn't? And a voter who takes pride in supporting such 
programs 
is telling  us that he'll do good with his own money -- if a gun is held to 
his  head."--P. J.  O'Rourke


On 6/6/2011 11:30 PM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  
 
I knew a fellow in New Mexico who was fairly well versed in the  Bible.
He told me about the "pretenders" he came across now and then,  who
would claim to know the Bible. His method for a "test" was to
"quote"  from the "Book of Hezekiah" and see what the  reaction
would be.
 
He pulled that one on me and I said, "ummm, I'm not familiar with
that one." 
 
word to the wise
Billy
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
message dated 6/6/2011 8:38:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected])  writes:

 
Interesting article Billy.  One of the guys quoted  in the article is a 
graduate of and professor at my undergrad alma mater,  Hope College.  I liked 
his quotation from 2 Hesitations 4:3. 
Chris 
 
 
From: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected])   
[_mailto:[email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) ]  On Behalf Of [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) 
Sent: Monday,  June 06, 2011 3:31 PM
To: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) 
Cc:  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Subject: [RC]  Phantom Bible Verses

 
--amazing, someone at CNN  who isn't a Biblical illiterate
 

 
beliefblog
 
_Actually, that's not in  the Bible_ 
(http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/05/thats-not-in-the-bible/) 
 
By John  Blake, CNN 
June 5,  2011 
(CNN) – NFL legend Mike Ditka was giving a news conference  one day after 
being fired as the coach of the Chicago Bears when he  decided to quote the 
Bible.

 
“Scripture tells you that all things shall  pass,” a choked-up Ditka said 
after leading his team to only five wins  during the previous season.  “
This, too, shall  pass.” 
Ditka fumbled his biblical citation, though.  The phrase “This, too, shall 
pass” doesn’t appear in the Bible. Ditka was  quoting a phantom scripture 
that sounds like it belongs in the Bible, but  look closer and it’s not 
there. 
Ditka’s biblical blunder is as common as  preachers delivering long-winded 
public prayers. The Bible may be the most  revered book in America, but it’s 
also one of the most misquoted.  Politicians, motivational speakers, 
coaches - all types of people  -  quote passages that actually have no place in 
the Bible, religious  scholars say. 
These phantom passages  include: 
“God helps those who help  themselves.” 
“Spare the rod, spoil the  child.” 
And there is this often-cited paraphrase:  Satan tempted Eve to eat the 
forbidden apple in the Garden of Eden.   
None of those passages appear in the Bible,  and one is actually 
anti-biblical, scholars say. 
But people rarely challenge them because  biblical ignorance is so 
pervasive that it even reaches groups of people  who should know better, says 
Steve 
Bouma-Prediger, a religion professor at  Hope College in Holland, Michigan. 
“In my college religion classes, I sometimes  quote 2 Hesitations 4:3 (‘
There are no internal combustion engines in  heaven’),” Bouma-Prediger says. “
I wait to see if anyone realizes that  there is no such book in the Bible 
and therefore no such  verse. 
“Only a few catch on.” 
Few catch on because they don’t want to -  people prefer knowing biblical 
passages that reinforce their pre-existing  beliefs, a Bible professor says. 
“Most people who profess a deep love of the  Bible have never actually read 
the book,” says Rabbi Rami Shapiro,  who once had to persuade a student in 
his Bible class at Middle  Tennessee State University that the saying “this 
dog won’t hunt” doesn’t  appear in the Book of Proverbs. 
“They have memorized parts of texts that  they can string together to prove 
the biblical basis for whatever it is  they believe in,” he says, “but 
they ignore the vast majority of the  text." 
Phantom biblical passages work in  mysterious ways 
Ignorance isn’t the only cause for phantom  Bible verses. Confusion is 
another. 
Some of the most popular faux verses are  pithy paraphrases of biblical 
concepts or bits of folk  wisdom. 
Consider these two: 
“God works in mysterious  ways.” 
“Cleanliness is next to  Godliness.” 
Both sound as if they are taken from the  Bible, but they’re not. The first 
is a paraphrase of a 19th century hymn  by the English poet William Cowper (
“God moves in a mysterious way, His  wonders to perform). 
The “cleanliness” passage was coined by John  Wesley, the 18th century 
evangelist who founded Methodism,  says  Thomas Kidd, a history professor at 
Baylor University in  Texas. 
“No matter if John Wesley or someone else  came up with a wise saying - if 
it sounds proverbish, people figure it  must come from the Bible,” Kidd 
says. 
Our fondness for the short and tweet-worthy  may also explain our fondness 
for phantom biblical phrases. The  pseudo-verses function like theological 
tweets: They’re pithy  summarizations of biblical concepts. 
“Spare the rod, spoil the child” falls into  that category. It’s a popular 
verse - and painful for many kids. Could  some enterprising kid avoid the 
rod by pointing out to his mother that  it's not in the Bible? 
It’s doubtful. Her possible retort: The  popular saying is a distillation 
of Proverbs 13:24: “The one who withholds  [or spares] the rod is one who 
hates his son.” 
Another saying that sounds Bible-worthy:  “Pride goes before a fall.” But 
its approximation, Proverbs 16:18, is  actually written: “Pride goeth before 
destruction, and an haughty spirit  before a fall.” 
There are some phantom biblical verses for  which no excuse can be offered. 
The speaker goofed. 
That’s what Bruce Wells, a  theology professor, thinks happened to Ditka, 
the former NFL coach,  when he strayed from the gridiron to biblical 
commentary during his 1993  press conference in Chicago. 
Wells watched Ditka’s biblical blunder on  local television when he lived 
in Chicago. After Ditka cited the  mysterious passage, reporters scrambled 
unsuccessfully the next day to  find the biblical source. 
They should have consulted Wells, who is now  director of the ancient 
studies program at Saint Joseph’s University in  Pennsylvania. Wells says Ditka’
s error probably came from a peculiar  feature of the King James Bible. 
“My hunch on the Ditka quote is that it  comes from a quirk of the King 
James translation,” Wells says. “Ancient  Hebrew had a particular way of 
saying things like, ‘and the next thing  that happened was…’ The King James 
translators of the Old Testament  consistently rendered this as ‘and it came to 
pass.’  ’’ 
When phantom Bible passages turn  dangerous 
People may get verses wrong, but they also  mangle plenty of well-known 
biblical stories as  well. 
Two examples: The scripture never says a  whale swallowed Jonah, the Old 
Testament prophet, nor did any New  Testament passages say that three wise men 
visited baby Jesus,  scholars say. 
Those details may seem minor, but scholars  say one popular phantom Bible 
story stands above the rest: The Genesis  story about the fall of humanity. 
Most people know the popular version - Satan  in the guise of a serpent 
tempts Eve to pick the forbidden apple from the  Tree of Life. It’s been 
downhill ever since. 
But the story in the book of Genesis never  places Satan in the Garden of 
Eden. 
“Genesis mentions nothing but a serpent,”  says Kevin Dunn, chair of the 
department of religion at Tufts University  in Massachusetts. 
“Not only does the text not mention Satan,  the very idea of Satan as a 
devilish tempter postdates the composition of  the Garden of Eden story by at 
least 500 years,” Dunn  says. 
Getting biblical scriptures and stories  wrong may not seem significant, 
but it can become dangerous, one scholar  says. 
Most people have heard this one: “God helps  those that help themselves.” 
It’s another phantom scripture that appears  nowhere in the Bible, but many 
people think it does. It's actually  attributed to Benjamin Franklin, one of 
the nation's founding  fathers. 
The passage is popular in part because it is  a reflection of cherished 
American values: individual liberty and  self-reliance, says Sidnie White 
Crawford, a religious studies scholar at  the University of Nebraska. 
Yet that passage contradicts the biblical  definition of goodness: defining 
one’s worth by what one does for others,  like the poor and the outcast, 
Crawford says. 
Crawford cites a scripture from Leviticus  that tells people that when they 
harvest the land, they should leave some  “for the poor and the alien” 
(Leviticus 19:9-10), and another passage from  Deuteronomy that declares that 
people should not be “tight-fisted toward  your needy neighbor.” 
“We often infect the Bible with our own  values and morals, not asking what 
the Bible’s values and morals really  are,” Crawford says. 
Where do these phantom passages come  from? 
It’s easy to blame the spread of phantom  biblical passages on pervasive 
biblical illiteracy. But the causes are  varied and go back centuries. 
Some of the guilty parties are anonymous,  lost to history. They are 
artists and storytellers who over the years  embellished biblical stories and 
passages with their own  twists. 
If, say, you were an anonymous artist  painting the Garden of Eden during 
the Renaissance, why not portray the  serpent as the devil to give some punch 
to your creation? And if you’re a  preacher telling a story about Jonah, 
doesn’t it just sound better to say  that Jonah was swallowed by a whale, not 
a “great  fish”? 
Others blame the spread of phantom Bible  passages on King James, or more 
specifically the declining popularity of  the King James translation of the 
Bible. 
That translation, which marks 400 years of  existence this year, had a near 
monopoly on the Bible market as recently  as 50 years ago, says Douglas 
Jacobsen, a professor of church history and  theology at Messiah College in 
Pennsylvania. 
“If you quoted the Bible and got it wrong  then, people were more likely to 
notice because there was only one text,”  he says. “Today, so many 
different translations are used that almost no  one can tell for sure if 
something 
supposedly from the Bible is being  quoted accurately or not.” 
Others blame the spread of phantom biblical  verses on Martin Luther, the 
German monk who ignited the Protestant  Reformation, the massive “protest” 
against the excesses of the Roman  Catholic Church that led to the formation 
of Protestant church  denominations. 
“It is a great Protestant tradition for  anyone - milkmaid, cobbler, or 
innkeeper - to be able to pick up the Bible  and read for herself. No need for 
a highly trained scholar or cleric to  walk a lay person through the text,” 
says Craig Hazen, director of the  Christian Apologetics program at Biola 
University in Southern  California. 
But often the milkmaid, the cobbler - and  the NFL coach - start creating 
biblical passages without the guidance of  biblical experts, he says. 
“You can see this manifest today in living  room Bible studies across North 
America where lovely Christian people,  with no training whatsoever, drink 
decaf, eat brownies and ask each other,  ‘What does this text mean to you?
’’’ Hazen says.  
“Not only do they get the interpretation  wrong, but very often end up 
quoting verses that really aren’t  there.”
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community 
<[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 
--  
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 


-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to