Hi Ernie,

Succinctly put. I like it!

// Lennart

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> Among other things, I think this explains why Billy often finds my approach
> frustrating: he'd like to build a movement, whereas I'm busy building a
> philosophy.
>
> -- Ernie P.
>
> Organization vs. movement vs. 
> philosophy<http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/typepad/sethsmainblog/%7E3/l5rqUISdggo/organization-vs-movement-vs-philosophy.html>
> via Seth's Blog <http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/> by Seth Godin
> on 6/13/11
>
> An *organization* uses structure and resources and power to make things
> happen. Organizations hire people, issue policies, buy things, erect
> buildings, earn market share and get things done. Your company is probably
> an organization.
>
> A *movement* has an emotional heart. A movement might use an organization,
> but it can replace systems and people if they disappear. Movements are more
> likely to cause widespread change, and they require leaders, not managers.
> The internet, it turns out, is a movement, and every time someone tries to
> own it, they fail.
>
> A *philosophy* can survive things that might wipe out a movement and that
> would decimate an organization. A philosophy can skip a generation or two.
> It is often interpreted, and is more likely to break into autonomous groups,
> to morph and split and then reunite. Industrialism was a philosophy.
>
> The trouble kicks in when you think you have one and you actually have the
> other.
>
>

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to