Note : Oregon Hispanic population is now 11 %.
 
from the site : Right Directions
 
Hispanics Won’t Save Obama in 2012

 
 
June 15 2011  
By MERRILL MATTHEWS
 
 
 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Census_Bureau_2000,_Hispanics_in_the_United_States.png)
  
Image via Wikipedia

 
President Barack Obama is hoping his visit to Puerto Rico will shore up the 
 Hispanic vote for Democrats, but more importantly for his 2012 re-election 
 bid. 
The media choir has been singing a similar tune,  especially since the U.S. 
Census Bureau recently released a new _report_ 
(http://2010.census.gov/news/releases/operations/cb11-cn146.html) , “The 
Hispanic Population: 2010,” 
which  documents the disproportionately large growth in the Hispanic 
population. 
According to the 2010 Census, there were 308.7 million people residing in 
the  U.S. on April 1, 2010, of which 50.5 million (16 percent) were of 
Hispanic or  Latino origin. 
In addition, the Bureau asserted, “More than half  of the growth in the 
total population of the United States between 2000 and 2010  was due to the 
increase in the Hispanic population.”  Since Hispanics tend  to vote Democratic—
67 percent for Obama in 2008, according to a post-election  poll cited in 
the _New York Times_ 
(http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/us/politics/07latino.html) —the Obama 
campaign thinks that growth  could swing important states 
to the president. 
That thinking is as wishful, and deluded, as the happy talk that surrounded 
 the president’s economic policies and “shovel-ready” stimulus efforts 
that were  going to get the country working again.  Here’s why. 
People ≠ Voters — That New York Times story pointed out that  only 10 
million Latinos voted in the 2008 election, 9 percent of all voters, and  that 
was a record high.  Why so low?  For one thing, the Hispanic  population is 
_younger_ (http://www.infoplease.com/spot/hhmcensus1.html)  than the general 
population: 27.4 years was the  median age for Hispanics in 2009, vs. 36.8 
years for the U.S.  Younger ages  are less likely to vote, and a 
disproportionately large percentage of Hispanics  aren’t even of voting age. 
Another important point: No one knows how many of those 50 million 
Hispanics  are citizens eligible to vote.  The Census counts people in the  
U.S., 
not citizens.  Someone from the Bureau told me that interviewers do  not ask 
about citizenship nor do they record citizenship status.  There has  been a 
groundswell of Hispanics entering the U.S. over the last decade, some  
legally but many not, which has led to a huge national debate over  
immigration.  
How many of the 15.2 million more Hispanics (between 2000 and  2010) are 
eligible to vote?  We simply don’t know from Census surveys, but  it’s 
reasonable to think that many, and perhaps most, can’t—at least not  legally. 
The Electoral College Decides — The Electoral College, not  the popular 
vote, decides who will be president.  If none of those 50  million new 
Hispanics lived in California, President Obama would likely get all  of the 
state’s 
55 electoral votes; if all of them lived in California—and the  largest 
number do—and they all vote for Obama he would still get … 55 electoral  votes. 
So the question for presidential election purposes is as much about where  
those votes are as how many there are.  The Census Bureau says 75 percent  
of the Hispanic population is located in eight states: California, Texas,  
Florida, New York, Illinois, Arizona, New Jersey and Colorado.  Of those  
states, California, New York, Illinois and New Jersey will very likely remain  
blue in the next presidential election, while Texas and Arizona will almost  
certainly remain red.  Colorado, which has been trending blue, and Florida,  
which leans red but not by much, could be swayed. 
Of the nine states where the Hispanic population more than doubled—Alabama, 
 Arkansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, 
 Tennessee and South Dakota—eight are in the south and all but one, 
Maryland,  either lean or are strongly red. 
The point is that a burgeoning Hispanic population may lead to a major 
shift  in voting patterns at some point in the future, but not 2012.  That 
said, 
 there are some important swing states—e.g., Florida, Pennsylvania, North  
Carolina and Colorado—that could be affected by Hispanic votes next year. 
Hispanics Are Diverse — The Census Bureau struggles with  identifying a “
Hispanic” since it is not a race, but more a place of origin,  such as 
Central or South America or countries located in the Caribbean.   Needless to 
say, 
there are lots of differences among these populations.   Puerto Ricans 
living on the mainland, for example, tend to vote Democratic;  those of Cuban 
descent tend to vote Republican.  But the largest Puerto  Rican population is 
in New York, which will vote for Obama anyway.  In  swing-state Florida, 
however, Cubans outnumber Puerto Ricans by 400,000. 
Hispanics Are More Affected by a Bad Economy — A lot has  been made of the 
notion that the Hispanic population, many of whom are Catholic,  tend to 
embrace conservative social values but liberal economic policies.   And those 
conservative social values give Republicans an opportunity to attract  them 
to the GOP. 
But the real opportunity for the GOP to get their presidential vote in 2012 
 comes from the devastating impact President Obama’s economic policies have 
had  on lower-income families.  Texas, where I live, has the second largest 
 Hispanic population; they come mostly from Mexico and Central America, 
according  to the Census.  Most are hard workers who take service sector jobs 
in  agriculture, construction, yard and landscape work, and restaurants.  
When  the economy goes south, they are some of the first and hardest hit. 
Those who are citizens and can vote may decide that Obama has had his  
chance.  The recession officially ended in June of 2009, yet two years  later 
the unemployment rate at 9.1 percent is still disastrously high—and much  
higher for Hispanics.  Even more troubling, the president seems befuddled  
about 
what to do next. 
Of course, Obama may still get more Hispanic votes than his Republican  
challenger, but that doesn’t mean he wins; Sen. John Kerry won the Hispanic 
vote  over President Bush in 2004 by 9 percentage points, and Bush still won.   
But there is little reason to think, both for demographic reasons and the 
sour  economy, that Hispanics will provide Obama with a victory in 2012. 
However, the Census Bureau publication does point to a trend that neither  
party can ignore.  Hispanics are becoming a larger and more politically  
potent force in U.S. politics.  The party that moves to provide them with  the 
greatest opportunities, not the most handouts, is the one that will capture  
their allegiance for the long term. 
Merrill Matthews is a resident scholar with the Institute for Policy  
Innovation in Dallas, Texas.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to