Our best hope for avoiding creeping Sharia is empowering women. Female Muslim Activists lament the spread of sharia law http://islamtodayoregon.blogspot.com/2011/08/female-muslim-activists-lament-spread.html
Their efforts to reform Islam are being hampered by the spread of sharia law courts and feminist Muslims are dismayed that because of this, their efforts are being hamstrung. The examples of sharia courts in Britain and Canada reinforce their cause and voice, and they rightly point out how sharia has crept beyond simple cases of arbitration to become, in some cases standing legal opinion instead of English common law. Theirs is a cautionary tale to which the West needs to pay attention. And to all those Western feminists and their supporters who are rallying behind these brave Muslim women, thank you. Oops, sorry, I forgot there are few if any Western feminists who voice their support and spend their money on helping Muslim women achieve and keep their rights as humans and women in both Muslim and non-Muslim countries. >From The Australian August 9 by Ida Lichter Sharia law in the West goes against fight for reforms ATTEMPTS to introduce sharia family law into Western societies run against the tide of reforms spearheaded by female activists in the Muslim world. Many aspects of these laws are unpalatable to a society that has enforced equal rights for divorce, custody, inheritance and court testimony, and criminalised polygamy and forced, under-age marriage. Moreover, the experience with sharia in Britain and Canada is cautionary. It is estimated thousands of British Muslim men have taken advantage of a loophole in the law against bigamy to avoid official registration and seal polygamous marriages in mosque ceremonies. Religious divorces, much more difficult for women, were issued by sharia councils in a form of mediation under the Arbitration Act of 1996. In 2007, Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi took advantage of a clause in the act to establish the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal, which could now make judgments enforceable under British law. The tribunal also ran sharia courts. Matters such as commercial and inheritance disputes could be resolved provided both parties agreed and the procedures were fair, but criminal and family issues such as forced marriage, domestic violence or civil divorce, were prohibited. According to a report by British think tank Civitas in 2009, some rulings of sharia courts or tribunals advised illegal actions and others were incompatible with British law. Try these: polygamous marriage (two to four wives) is considered legal; there is no requirement to register a marriage according to the law of the country; a woman cannot marry without the presence (and permission) of a male guardian; a woman may not leave her home without her husband’s consent; a woman may not retain custody of her child after seven (for a boy) or nine (for a girl); and “severe punishments for homosexuals” are recommended. In June, a new bill tabled in the House of Lords by Baroness Cox aimed to strike out gender-discriminatory rulings in sharia courts and make it a criminal offence, with a jail term of up to five years, to falsely claim jurisdiction in family and criminal cases. Recently, the Ministry of Justice in the Coalition government abandoned an inquiry into the courts because the latter refused to co-operate. Existence of an estimated 85 official and unofficial courts in Britain has not fulfilled the ambitions of extremists. In the London boroughs of Waltham Forest, Tower Hamlets and Newham, a recent poster campaign proclaimed sharia-controlled zones and implementation of Islamic rules, including bans on alcohol, drugs, gambling, music, smoking, prostitution, homosexuality and the mixing of sexes in public. In Canada, sharia courts operated under Ontario’s Arbitration Act of 1991. After the leader of the Canadian Society of Muslims declared that a “good Muslim” was enjoined to choose religious tribunals over Canadian civil courts, Homa Arjomand, an Iranian immigrant, feared Muslim women would be coerced into an alternative legal system where they would be denied protection of the Canadian Charter of Rights. Arjomand mounted a campaign, and in 2005 the premier of Ontario banned all faith-based arbitration in the province to ensure one law for all. In Muslim-majority countries, many female reformers have campaigned for changes to gender discriminatory laws. Iranian women “suffragettes” have held demonstrations, risking injury, arrest and imprisonment. In Afghanistan, some women activists have been assassinated. Most reformers maintain the Koran is inherently egalitarian, and discriminatory laws evolved in a patriarchal, tribal society without the input of women. They also note that laws from 7th-century Arabia may not be applicable in the 21st. A understated truth if ever there was one. Read it all (via Instapaper) Sent from my iPhone -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
