Washington Examiner
 
_Unions lose big in  Wisconsin_ 
(http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/unions-lose-big-wisconsin)
  
 
by_David Freddoso_ 
(http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/author/david-freddoso) 
August 10, 2011


 
An energized Democratic base was supposed to turn out yesterday. It was  
supposed to pry away from Republicans their total control of Wisconsin's state 
 legislature. Republicans had gone after the state's public employee 
unions, and  this was supposed to be an overreach that would cost them dearly 
in 
yesterday's  recall elections. If Democrats could pick up three of the six 
seats under  recall, they could win back the state Senate and block Gov. Scott 
Walker's  agenda. 
Every Republican I spoke to before the election expressed pessimism. The  
expectations were clearly in favor of a Democratic takeover -- so much so 
that  Republicans in Wisconsin's legislature took the extraordinary step of 
passing an  early redistricting bill. 
And then...it just didn't work out the way the unions had hoped. 
_In the  end_ (http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/127331193.html) , 
the union-backed Democrats picked up only two state Senate seats in  
Wisconsin last night, at a staggering cost in time, effort, and of course 
money.  
One of the seats was solidly Democratic, held by a Republican due to an 
apparent  fluke of nature. The other was held by an alleged adulterer who had 
moved  outside his district to live with his young mistress, and whose wife 
was  supporting his recall. 
As for the other four Republican incumbents the unions tried to recall, 
they  didn't end up coming very close. And remember -- these weren't just any  
Republican incumbents. These were the ones that the unions judged most  
vulnerable, which is why they collected petition signatures against them. 
How did Republicans hold out? It hasn't hurt that Walker's reforms have  
dramatically helped school districts within the state save millions of dollars 
 by _abolishing  the main Wisconsin teachers' union's insurance racket_ 
(http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/2011/07/wisconsin-schools-buck-union-cut
-health-costs) . Nor does it hurt that  Wisconsin, under the 
business-friendly leadership of Walker and a Republican  state legislature, 
created _more 
than half  of the jobs created in the United States during the month of 
June_ (http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9OK6CRO1.htm) . 
To be sure, yesterday's contests offered few lessons for 2012, as far as 
the  status of swing-state Wisconsin is concerned. But at the state level, and 
on the  level of ideas, yesterday's elections have deep meaning. And with 
two Democrats  in the state Senate facing recalls next week -- perhaps one is 
genuinely  vulnerable -- we may have seen the unions' high political tide, 
especially if  Walker's reforms really do weaken their clout. 
"The people" were supposed to be on the side of the unions who protested at 
 the state capitol when Walker's bill passed, limiting the unions' 
collective  bargaining privileges against taxpayers and school districts. But 
it 
turns out  that "the people" had other ideas. In the end, even a massive 
infusion of cash  and union volunteers was not enough to deliver the three 
state 
Senate recall  races the unions needed, despite the fact that President Obama 
carried all six  of the seats in question in 2008. 
This marks the unions' third huge defeat in Wisconsin this year. The other  
two were the passage of Walker's bill and the re-election of David Prosser 
to  the state Supreme Court. The grand talk of recalling Walker himself next 
year  seems a bit blustery now, given the great failure of last  night.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to