How about a Lefty saying nice things about Jack Kemp ?
That's sorta like Chomsky saying that he thinks that
Gingrich did some good stuff as Speaker of the House.
 
Seems to me that is in the "man bites dog" category.
 
Billy
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 
message dated 8/14/2011 10:18:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

That's a real "dog bites man" post. 

What  are you seeing that I'm not? 

David

  _   
 
"There is no virtue in  compulsory government charity, and there is no 
virtue in advocating it. A  politician who portrays himself as "caring" and 
"sensitive" because he wants  to expand the government's charitable programs is 
merely saying that he's  willing to try to do good with other people's 
money. Well, who isn't? And a  voter who takes pride in supporting such 
programs 
is telling us that he'll do  good with his own money -- if a gun is held to 
his head."--P. J.  O'Rourke


On 8/14/2011 5:19 PM, [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  wrote:  
 
This is not --from my perspective-- interesting insofar as Cole  expresses
negative views of Rick Perry. 
 
Cole's opinion of Perry is completely predictable.
 
What is interesting is the Radical Centrist type logic in his  discussion
of  --of all people--  Jack Kemp. Maybe this portends nothing  at all.
Can't say. But it is worth noting that even Cole, far on the Left  side
of the political spectrum, here discusses a political subject 
while making use of a major RC principle.
 
Billy
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
 
 
message dated 8/14/2011  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   
writes:

     
_Informed  Comment_ (http://www.juancole.com/)  


 
____________________________________
_Rick Perry and  the Hucksterism of the Rich_ 
(http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/juancole/ymbn/~3/qNSPUFNQIIY/rick-perry-and-the-hucksterism-of-the-rich.ht
ml?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email)   
Posted:  14 Aug 2011 12:25 AM PDT 
 
Rick Perry’s announcement of his presidential ambitions marks the  the 
triumph of fantasy over reality in American politics. Among our  more pressing 
problems are global climate change caused by human  production of greenhouse 
gases; religious fanaticism and  interference in governance; and the 
structural deficit faced by the  US government 
It used to be that political divisions were about the different  methods 
proposed to deal with social problems by persons with  different political 
philosophies. Nowadays, politics is about which  fantasy-land the politicians 
and their admirers reside in.  
In the mid-to-late twentieth century, liberals wanted to address  lack of 
proper housing for the poor by building tenements for them.  Conservatives 
like _Jack Kemp (Housing secretary under Bush  Senior) argued that market 
mechanisms_ 
(http://articles.latimes.com/1989-02-25/news/mn-228_1_public-housing)  could be 
enlisted to get  them housed. It is not clear that the 
conservatives were right, but  the liberals definitely turned out to be wrong. 
The 
public housing  had no stakeholders and it quickly deteriorated into a kind of 
hell.  But all parties to the argument, including Republican Kemp, took the 
 problem of housing for the poor seriously, and everyone learned from  the 
success and failures. 
Nowadays, Kemp’s analogues would likely just blithely deny that  there are 
any poor people lacking adequate housing. 
Thus, _Rick Perry not only denies global climate  change _ 
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/aug/12/rick-perry-climate-sceptics-president)
 
but has sued to stop the Environmental Protection Agency  from trying to curb 
emissions in Texas. Ironically, if anybody will  suffer from global warming, 
it is Texans, and the warmer  temperatures of recent years are hitting them 
especially hard. 
Perry’s response to Texas’s drought? To pray for rain. 
(If anything, the evidence from teams of scientists at MIT and  elsewhere 
is that _the pace of climate change has been  underestimated_ 
(http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/arctic-ice-melt-0810.html)  by 
international bodies 
like the IPCC). 
_Perry has links to a theocratic evangelical  movement _ 
(http://www.democracynow.org/2011/8/12/as_texas_gov_rick_perry_enters) that, 
like the 
Khomeinists in Iran, believes that  religion should take control of the 7 power 
centers in society,  including the arts, media, the family, and the government. 
He led a  national day of Christian prayer to which he invited other  
governors, _raising questions about his commitment to the  separation_ 
(http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/07/texas-gov-calls-for-prayer-and-fasting/)
  of 
religion and state. The religion Perry promotes is  not the social gospel of 
Jesus of Nazareth, but rather an absolute  worship of property rights 
dressed up as spirituality. His religious  commitments are to be imposed on the 
rest of us (as in Iran). Thus,  he will work against women’s choice and 
against the rights of gay  partners to be married, because of his own personal 
theology. 
He is another one of those dreary Red State governors who _denounces 
Federal taxes but is first in line  for Federal help._ (http
://www.americablog.com/2011/04/anti-government-anti-tax-texas-governor.html)  
In fact, he covered 
a _$6 bn. shortfall in the Texas budget with $6  bn in stimulus money_ 
(http://www.burntorangereport.com/diary/11050/rick-perry-makes-texas-1-in-mooching
-federal-stimulus-funds)  from Barack Obama, & now boasts of his  governing 
skills with regard to the economy. The only way to  eliminate the long-term 
structural deficit in the Federal budget  without harming Federal programs 
like social security and medicare  is to raise taxes on the wealthy 
(including closing their tax  loopholes). Perry denies this simple fact. 
Indeed, _Perry has said he believes Texas has the  right to secede from the 
union at will_ 
(http://www.statesman.com/news/content/region/legislature/stories/04/17/0417gop.html)
 , making some wags ask the  question of what 
country he wants to be president of. (Given his  dedication to public 
imposition 
of religion, maybe he should try  Iran). 
Perry is in the American tradition of the huckster and the  booster, the 
snake oil salesman who promises you a cure for what  ails you that turns out 
to be one part pretty words and another part  dream castle. He is no Jack 
Kemp, who saw social problems and sought  fixes for them in the private sector 
or in public-private  partnerships. Perry sees no problems that can’t be 
fixed by slashing  taxes further on our 400 billionaires and then holding 
prayer  meetings for the unemployed. This blindness is not an accident. The  
Republican Supreme Court’s interference in election campaign reform  has 
ensured 
that the super-wealthy in this country can get the best  politicians money 
can buy into office.  
The preference of the campaign funders for colorful and slightly  
unbalanced fanatics sure to do their bidding is probably unwise,  since in its 
pure 
form Ayn Rand selfishness among the rich is  unlovely in the eyes of the 
public, especially when espoused by  attractive neurotics. Perry has an 
advantage denied to the Bachmanns  and the Palins, of being well-spoken and 
seeming 
like a normal  person; but his positions do not materially differ from most 
of  theirs. 
And so our national debate is stunted and distorted. Instead of  arguing 
over the best ways of dealing with our most pressing  problems, we are reduced 
to disputing about whether a problem even  exists. The latter is a 
rhetorical device of wealthy special  interests designed to derail the ordinary 
workings of democracy.  Perry is among their would-be  standard-bearers.
You  are subscribed to email updates from _Informed Comment_ 
(http://www.juancole.com/)  
To stop receiving  these emails, you may _unsubscribe now_ 
(http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailunsubscribe?k=wngNyKtBO-lCZMrgMN7ZckbsqU8)
 . Email  
delivery powered by Google  Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA  60610


 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist  Community 
_<[email protected]>_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Google  Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 




-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to