Human Events

 

 
 
(http://yads.zedo.com/ads2/c?a=997793;x=3584;g=172;c=1318000060,1318000060;i=1;n=1318;1=1;2=1;s=27;g=172;m=4095;w=255;i=1;u=Of0o@woBADQAABEjWOsAAAAE~07
0311;p=6;f=966324;h=966322;s=27;u=Of0o@woBADQAABEjWOsAAAAE~070311;z=0.673728
6722051419;k=http://oascentral.humanevents.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/hu
manevents.com/article/L23/1969887466/Top/EaglePub/adsales_28051-SF_HEweb_New
smax-0729/0729_HELB_Newsmax.html/7a38683069553551784c304142385847?http://w3.
newsmax.com/a/aftershockb/index_l.cfm?PROMO_CODE=CB67-1) 

 
 
Muslim World More Anti-American  Than Ever
 
by  _Robert  Maginnis_ 
(http://www.humanevents.com/search.php?author_name=Robert+Maginnis)  
08/18/2011 
 


Candidate Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign slogan  boasted, “Yes we can.”  
Then the new President promised a 2009 Egyptian  audience “a new beginning 
between the United States and Muslims,” and in  November 2009 he claimed, “We’
ve restored America’s standing in the  world.”  But Obama’s boast, his 
promise and his claim have crumbled across  the Muslim world, and so has 
America’
s influence.

Thirty-one months into Obama’s presidency, relations with the  Muslim world 
are the worst ever.  Both Muslim public opinion and the  deteriorating 
situation in most Islamic countries evidence anti-Americanism that  screams, 
“No 
he can’t.”  

Obama  obviously can’t transform our relationship with the Muslim world, as 
evidenced  by the state of affairs in three bellwether countries.

First, Egypt is a longstanding ally, but its January uprising  puts that 
relationship in jeopardy.  Egyptian public opinion is very  anti-American, and 
the coming election plus current events threaten to turn our  bilateral 
relations on their head.

A  July 2011 Zogby International survey of Egyptians found only 5% have a 
favorable  opinion of America, lower than during the George W. Bush 
administration.   And a Pew Research survey taken this spring found that 
Egyptians 
overwhelmingly  (82%) disapprove of Obama’s handling of the conflict between 
Israelis and  Palestinians, and a simple majority (52%) disapprove of the way 
Obama handled  political change in the Middle East.

Those negative marks reflect displeasure with Obama’s  flip-floppinig Egypt 
policy last January.  Initially he backed  then-President Hosni Mubarak, 
but as public cries for change grew, Obama called  for Mubarak to step down.  
Then Obama made the strategic mistake of backing  _Omar Suleiman_ 
(http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45588#) ​, Egypt’s unpopular vice 
president, to replace  Mubarak.

Obama makes another mistake if  he expects Egypt’s future democratically 
elected government to be  pro-American.  Barry Rubin, the director of the 
Israel-based Global  Research in International Affairs Center, argues in his 
daily blog that Egypt’s  _Muslim Brotherhood_ 
(http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45588#) ​, that nation’s largest 
political party, will  earn 40% 
of the parliament’s seats this fall.  That political tsunami will  result in 
a move to annul the peace treaty with Israel and impose laws that  strictly 
follow the Koran, Islam’s holy book.

Egypt’s transformation to an Islamic state is already evident  on several 
additional fronts.  The Obama administration tried to pour $65  million into 
Egypt this year to help organize secular political parties, but  that effort 
sparked a powerful backlash from Cairo’s military government and the  
Muslim Brotherhood, which evidently colluded on plans for the future 
government.  

Egypt also reversed past policy by  improving relations with the Muslim 
Brotherhood’s ally and terror group Hamas,  which rules the neighboring Gaza 
Strip.  Cairo now allows arms and money to  flow into Gaza and refuses to 
pressure Hamas to make peace with Israel or stop  its regular rocket attacks on 
nearby Jewish settlements. 

On other Egyptian fronts there are  increased attacks against Coptic 
Christians, murders of secularists, and more  attacks by Islamists.  Recently 
the 
terror group Takfir wal-Hijra, a group  aligned with al-Qaeda, attacked two 
police stations in el-Arish. 

Second, Turkey is on a glide path to  become an anti-American Islamist 
state.  Public opinion is already  anti-American, but that neo-Ottoman 
government is purging its military, which  until recently kept it on a secular 
path.

The 2011 Pew Research survey found only one in 10 Turks has a  favorable 
opinion of the U.S., and President Obama gets especially low approval  marks 
(12%) from Turks, down from 23% last year.  About two-thirds in  Turkey (68%) 
disapprove of Obama’s handling of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict  in 
particular.

Turkey’s government is  run by an Islamic party, the Justice and 
Development Party, that is Islamatizing  the country.  Prime Minister Recep 
Tayyip 
Erdogan rode to his third  election victory this June with a 326-seat majority 
mandate vowing to rewrite  that nation’s constitution to be pro-Islamic.  
The military drafted the  current constitution after a 1980 coup, but the 
military ceases to be a  threat.

Erdogan purged the military of  all but Islamic loyalists.  Last month, the 
top military commanders  resigned in protest over the government’s arrest 
of hundreds of current and  retired officers on trumped-up charges of 
plotting against the government, which  elicited no response from the Obama 
administration.  Then Erdogan appointed  commanders who support the regime’s 
Islamatization of Turkey.

Turkey’s Islamic transformation is  beginning to affect everyday life.  The 
government pressured local  officials to ban outdoor eating during the holy 
month of Ramadan, and there are  reports of punishments for women wearing 
shorts in public and for smoking during  Ramadan.  Expect Saudi Arabia-style 
religious police to soon appear on  Turkish streets. 

Juxtapose these  internal changes with Ankara’s close relationship with 
Iran and how it has  distanced itself from formerly close ally Israel after 
supporting Tehran in the  Mavi Marmara affair.  That Turkish vessel took part 
in a flotilla of ships  operated by Islamic activists seeking to confront the 
Israeli blockade over Gaza  and was boarded and then diverted by Israeli 
forces in 2010.  Also, the  Turkish Hurriyet Daily News reported in April that 
the  Erdogan government is negotiating to open a Taliban office in Istanbul.

Obviously Turkey’s government is  bolstering its Islamic credentials to 
gain standing in the Muslim world.   Unfortunately, the Obama administration 
ignores Turkey’s transformation, which  bodes poorly for American influence.  

Third, Pakistan, an erstwhile ally armed with 100 nuclear  weapons, plays 
host to our al-Qaeda and Afghan Taliban enemies and proliferates  weapons of 
mass destruction.  Even though America has given Pakistan $20  billion in 
aid since 2001, our influence is limited, which is reflected in  public 
opinion polls and a lack of support for ongoing operations in  Afghanistan.

The 2011 Pew Research  survey found that Pakistanis are very anti-American, 
perhaps in part because of  actions such as our unannounced May 2 raid on 
Osama bin Laden’s compound inside  that country.  Only 11% of Pakistanis have 
a positive view of the U.S., a  6-point drop from a similar survey one year 
ago, and 54% believe their  government cooperates too much with the U.S., 
for example by allowing America to  launch terrorist-hunting drones from 
Pakistani airfields. 

The U.S.-Pakistan relationship is one of  mutual necessity.  America needs 
that nation’s ports and roads to move  supplies to our troops in 
Afghanistan, and its help defeating the Taliban.   But Islamabad plays both 
sides of 
the Afghan conflict in order to keep American  aid flowing, and ensure the 
instability of Afghanistan, the country that acts as  a buffer against 
Pakistan's archenemy, India. 

Unfortunately, America’s dwindling influence in Egypt, Turkey  and Pakistan 
is replicated across the Muslim world, either because of our  policies or 
in spite of them.  For example, Obama supports the NATO bombing  of Libya, 
yet its dictator _Muammar Gaddafi_ 
(http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45588#) ​, is likely to be replaced 
by anti-American  Islamist rebels.  Syria
’s dictator, Bashar al-Assad, has so far killed  1,700 protesters, which “
horrified” Obama.  But the President hasn’t called  for the dictator to 
leave, nor will he, because America has no influence in  Damascus either.

Our influence is  tanking in Iraq after pouring years worth of blood and 
treasure into that  country.  By mutual agreement we will leave Iraq this 
year, and then Iran  will likely rush in to manipulate Baghdad and its oil.  
Meanwhile, Iran  continues its atomic arms program and hegemonic ways in spite 
of our tepid  sanctions and meaningless rhetoric.

Obama’s Muslim policies are in shambles, our influence is  mostly shot, and 
while it is sometimes necessary to do business with countries  that oppose 
America, Islamic countries are especially unreliable when the most  radical 
elements grab power.  That is why it is time to drop the pretense  of 
compatibility, stop the flow of aid money, and assume tougher political and  
military policies.

 
____________________________________
Mr. Maginnis is a retired Army lieutenant colonel, and a national security 
and  foreign affairs analyst for radio and television. 
 
____________________________________




-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to