You will be pleased to know ( well, maybe not, but for the sake of argument 
 )
that on this issue I come down squarely on the Libertarian side. Now and  
then, anyway,
I indulge one of my passions, namely, micronations. This is a  type of 
geofiction.
 
With micronations, though, it isn't imaginary countries on distant planets  
you
get to design all by yourself  ( and if the government is  democratic or a 
constitutional
monarchy or a customized theocracy in which faith in UFOs is the state  
religion,
that is your call ) . Instead you divvy up parcels of Earth real  estate at 
your discretion.
For example, I myself, on behalf of a so far secret  micronation,  claim 
about
25 % of the surface of Antarctica, plus several Pacific islands no-one is  
using anyway,
plus various counties across the USA, as parts of my sovereign Grand  Duchy.
This includes the eastern half of Lane County, here in Oregon, which is  the
capital of the Duchy and is global redoubts.
 
Some micronation people, though, take this further. Like Sealand, referred  
to in
the article  --an actual place, on a previously unclaimed and  previously 
derelict
oil rig platform in the North Sea. This is also a refuge for pirate radio.  
Technically it still
is British but  Her Majesty's gvt has had no inclination to do  anything at 
all
with the platform and so it has become a new "state" in Europe.
 
A few folks have created scams based on the idea, and have done such  things
as selling, for real money, condos on Caribbean islands that don't exist,  
or that 
may well exist, but as undeveloped specks of land in the middle of  nowhere.
 
True , these scams do not interest me, but otherwise, heck, why not ?
 
Next time you want to visit Antarctica, though, you'll need to first  obtain
a passport from my Grand Duchy.
 
Details upon request. 
 
Since you are a friend there will be no fee. All non-friends will need  to
shell out $ 50.
 
To get there you may wish to fly in the comfort of the imaginary  airline
of the Duchy. Or perchance, go there in style in one of the Duchy's
imaginary cruise ships, really a splendid experience, 
never to be forgotten.
 
signed :
Baron von Wilhelm
 
--on behalf of all of the subjects of the secret Duchy
 
 
 
 
 
message dated 9/3/2011 9:04:44 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

 
    *   _reason.org_ (http://reason.org/)  


_Libertarians  Hunt Humans—And Other Tales_ 
(http://reason.com/archives/2011/09/02/libertarians-hunt-humansmdasha) 
The latest hysterical response to libertarian ideas
_David Harsanyi_ (http://reason.com/people/david-harsanyi)  |  September 2, 
2011 
 
With the electorate getting more comfortable with libertarian ideas, a  
Maginot Line of hackery is being built to keep the barbarians out. 
The latest is over at _Reuters_ 
(http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2011/09/01/do-libertarians-like-peter-thiel-really-want-to-live-in-america/)
 ,  
where Sally Kohn writes one of the silliest pieces on the topic I’ve ever  
read. Using Peter Thiel’s seasteading efforts (”sovereign nations built on  
oil-rig-type platforms anchored in international waters”) as her touch-point 
 she expounds on this “sinister” and “un-American” ideology lurking deep 
in the  dark souls of otherwise “tame-seeming libertarians.” 
Don’t like the idea of tax dollars paying for public schools or highway  
construction or Medicare—or don’t like the idea of taxes at all? The brave  
new floating world offers just the solution. And if the self-appointed  
creators wish it, there would be no restrictions on guns or automatic  weapons. 
Or, for that matter, no prohibition against murder. Pesky “moral  suasion”!
Automatic weapons and murder for all! (_The  Most Dangerous Game_ 
(http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0780022114/reasonmagazineA/)  starring 
Peter 
Thiel as Zaroff.) Was she joking?  I can’t tell. 
No, I don’t “like” the idea forcing citizens to join a Washington-run  
health care program or forcing parents to pay for crappy school that fail  
their kids year after year. But I’ve yet to meet a libertarian who opposes  
restrictions on homicide. Perhaps I don’t get out often enough. I always knew  
there were many schools of libertarian thought, all of them having something  
to do with an underlying belief that an individual ought to have the 
freedom  to live his/her life as he/she likes as long he/she respects the 
individual  rights of other hes/shes. Critics always seem to ignore the latter 
half 
of the  idea. Imaginary anarchy, racism, and hedonism ensue. 
Kohn also informs us that libertarians don’t want roads and would like to  
abolish FEMA and the TSA—which God gave us in 1979 and 2002,  respectively—
because if government isn’t helping no one is. (I suspect the  folks at the 
_Reason Foundatio_ (http://reason.org/areas/topic/311.html) n have  probably 
done more thinking about transportation today than Kohn has in her  entire 
life.) 
She tells us that anti-corporate he-devils used to avoid regulation—even  
the law—for personal gain but today he-devils want to start new countries 
even  as they look to destroy old ones. Never mind, that the modern-day Robber 
Baron  has a better chance enriching himself by buying into government. As 
long as  it’s environmental friendly cronyism this is to be admired. 
There are many substantive arguments available in this debate, but it seems 
 that the effort is to either misinform or scare the hell out of people. 
Do libertarians like Peter Thiel really want to live in America? (Evidently 
 he doesn’t? Right?) I suppose you’d have to ask him. I’m only a mushy 
small  “l” classical liberal type and I like living in America. But if America 
 becomes a place where government has its coercive hands in every aspect of 
 life and business—the kind of America that Kohn envisions—then 
seasteading is  going to look mighty attractive. 
David Harsanyi is a columnist at The Blaze. Follow him on Twitter  
@davidharsanyi. 
-- 
"Anyone  who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than 
people do is a  swine."--P. J.  O’Rourke 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to