The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, the Nazis, and  Islam
 
By : Billy Rojas
 
 
 
The story of Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in the  
period from
1921 and into the years of WWII,  is important not as some sort of  
historical footnote,
but as central to the rise of Islamic terrorism in the later 20th  century 
and extending
into the years from 9 / 11 to the present. This is made clear in a 2008  
book by
David Dalin and John Rothman,  Icon of  Evil,  Hitler's Mufti and 
the Rise of Radical Islam.
 
This  publication is highly recommended despite the fact that the text  is 
about
as poorly written as any book released by Random House has ever been.
Clearly the significance of the subject matter determined that the  volume
would get into print ;  just as clearly, the writing  is a mess. The book 
is filled with
numerous repeated comments and it is filled with editorial remarks to the  
effect
that the mufti is frequently described with derogatory adjectives or  
otherwise
belittled. Not that Husseni does not merit such unflattering  
characterizations,
if anyone does it is him, but in a scholarly text this is "over the  top."
 
The book also has some inexplicable weaknesses. A major theme in the  text
is the relationship of Hussein to the Nazi regime in the 1940s, since it  
establishes
an undeniable connection between modern-day Islamic terror and its  fascist
inspiration. But only one chapter in the book discusses this topic  despite 
the
abundance of material now available on that dimension of the mufti's  life
and the part played by Muslims in the SS in killing Jews in the name of  
Islam.
and killing many Serbian Christians as well. This has major importance  
inasmuch
as Husseini personally helped recruit Bosnian Muslims to serve in SS  units 
and
reported directly to Heinrich Himmler. Probably there is enough material  in
existence to write a separate volume just on that subject alone.
 
Similarly, the chapter on Husseini's activities in helping his close friend 
 Yasser Arafat
not only in organizing the PLO but acting as a free-lance leader in other  
Palestinian
causes, including his support for Hamas, is surprisingly undeveloped.  
Indeed, as is the
book generally, with only 143 pages of narrative text.
 
But all of this said, Icon of Evil is a treasure trove of information that  
is highly relevant
to an understanding what has been happening in the Mid East in the  years 
since
1948 and in our own time. Husseini's "signature" is everywhere. His death  
in 1974
was anything but the end of his story. It almost seems like every notable  
Muslim
leader of the past half century had some kind of direct connection to the  
mufti. 
The list includes Nasser, Anwar Sadat, Saddam Hussein, King Faisal of Saudi 
 Arabia, 
the Ayatollah Khomeini. Mahmoud Abbas, King Farouq of Egypt, Sayyid Qutb, 
and even Osama bin Laden.
 
More than anyone else, the mufti used his talents as an organizer and  
propagandist
to motivate other Muslims to interpret the Koran according to its literal  
meaning
as a source book filled with anti-Semitic ( anti-Jewish ) hatred,   
emphasizing
Muhammad's utter contempt for Jews and his example in murdering as  many
as possible as something pleasing to Allah.
 
The book is also valuable for the Appendix which is included, containing  
all the
documentary evidence anyone could ask for,  to establish a concrete  
connection
between Husseini and an 'all star' cast of ranking Nazis, including Hitler  
himself.
Pages 158 - 165 contain two versions of the mufti's lengthy meeting with  
Hitler
on November 28, 1943, one an official version provided by the office of  the
Reich Foreign Minister and the other a description written-out by  Husseini
is which  --as in other materials--  he expressed his admiration  for 
Hitler and
the Nazi regime. These documents also make it clear that had the German 
Army been successful in breaking through to the Caucasus that Hitler  was
prepared to support the Islamic cause in the Mid East and to  designate
Husseini as his 'viceroy,' to lead an Arab uprising against the  Allies.
 
The book also makes it clear that Husseini not only approved of the  
Holocaust,
he seems to have been instrumental is making it even worse for the Jews  
than
it might otherwise have been. On the question of the fate of Europe's  Jews,
Husseini and Hitler were in complete agreement, wishing for the  
extermination
of the entire Jewish people. And had it become possible the mufti wanted 
to organize a similar holocaust in what was then Palestine, to kill  all 
the Jews
of that land. In fact, Husseini wanted to use the techniques he  had 
observed
personally at Auschwitz during visits he made to the death camp in 1943 
and 1944. And by the way, Husseini was explicit that he saw gas  chambers
in use at Auschwitz and possibly at other camps he also visited.
 
During the war Husseini frequently made broadcasts to the Arab world,  
urging
fellow Muslims to do their utmost to sabotage the British military in any  
ways
open to them, and repeatedly making the point that the murder of Jews  is
demanded of Muslims by the Koran. These broadcasts also included  vehement
denunciations of America and Americans, whom he obviously hated with
seething passion.
 
But this is only to introduce the story, which has many dimensions, as  you
might suspect since Hussein was a guest of the Reich from 1941 to  1945,
most of that time a resident in Berlin  --where he lived in luxury.  Among 
the
mufti's friends and 'professional associates'  in those years were no  less 
than
Adolf Eichman, with whom he worked closely on a regular basis, Joseph  
Goebbels,
with whom he also worked directly, Joachim von Ribbentrop, also  closely
although less frequently, and Heinrich Himmler, with whom a warn  friendship
developed. Which does not count the meeting he also had with Mussolini in  
1941.
And which does not count the many other less well known Nazis whom he  knew,
some of whom he met up with in the Mid East, in Egypt in 1946-1947,  and 
in Palestine starting in 1948. 
 
This should surprise no-one. Nasser was pro-Nazi for much of his adult life 
and Sadat was candid about his similar views and even wrote about them 
in his autobiography. But, and by no means only because of the testimony 
of  Icon of Evil, possibly a majority of Muslims in that era were Nazi 
sympathizers,  including many Muslims in India, especially in the area 
that was to become Pakistan.
 
Husseini was, by all accounts, a major war criminal. The evidence against  
him
was overwhelming, but circumstances transpired to allow his escape  from
justice after the war. Three nations in particular could have acted to see  
to it 
that Husseini was tried at Nuremberg, but for reasons peculiar to each, 
nothing was done.
 
The British and French wanted to reassert control over their colonies  in
Dar al-Islam and did not want the distraction of having possibly the  most
well known Muslim in the world at the time, sentenced to death and  all
of his dirty linen aired in public, since so many other prominent  Muslims
would be implicated. And Yugoslavia was seeking to rebuild after the  war
and did not wish to provoke the Bosnians and other Muslims to revolt
since Husseini remained a hero to them.
 
And so, thanks to Hussein's influence,  the modern jihadi movement was  born
in the years after he had re-established himself in the Mid East. Not that  
there
had not been a tradition of jihad long before the post WWII era. Quite  the
contrary, there never has been a time, except for limited periods, when  
Muslims
somewhere were not at war against other people. But Husseini gave the  cause
of jihad its 'modern' character, replete with his use of fatwas to justify  
attacks
against Jews, a technique adopted widely and used against all  perceived
enemies of Islam, his frequent reliance on the ( discredited since the  
1920s )
Protocols of the Elders of Zion, as a sort of 'new testament to  the Koran,
his use of the Koran as the equivalent of  Mein Kampf ( which  is easy 
enough
to do ),  and, later, development of an ideology of Holocaust  denial
despite his wartime experiences, which he carefully documented.
 
All of this, the pervasive Nazi character of  the whole modern-day  
Islamist 
movement plain for all to see, especially since it was central to the  
ideology
of the Muslim Brotherhood ( to which Hussein belonged ) from its  inception,
and the "liberal" Left nonetheless identifies with Islamic radicalism.  Any 
criticism 
of Islam and Democrats in Congress take action to condemn the critics 
as "Islamophobes" and "fascists" !
 
Which, of course, is a phenomenon that is hardly a Democratic Party  
exclusive.
The Bush Republicans, especially all those associated with Grover  Norquist,
are little better. To the extent that an entire chapter of the 9 / 11  
Commission 
report , all about Saudi involvement in the attack on America, was  expunged
on orders of the Bush White House. About which,  former Florida  governor
Bob Graham is currently telling one and all.
 
This takes us beyond the scope of the book, Icon of Evil, but it  should  
now be
possible to see exactly what is happening in the Mid East as anything  but
the sanitized story which the mainstream media portrays to the public
day in and day out. The story of modern Islam is intrinsically woven  in
with that of Hitler and Nazism.
 
The final weakness in the book to report, however, is perhaps its  greatest
shortcoming. The text is utterly silent about Communist involvement in  the
Mid East during the years that the mufti acted as the major leader in  the
Islamist cause. After all, no less than Nasser himself became a client  of
the Soviet Union, as did a good number of Arab states including.
Iraq in the Saddam era, Syria, and Yemen. That story simply
is absent from the book. This omission is serious and the saga
of Communist influence in the region definitely needs attention.
But that is a matter for another time.
 
"Icon of Evil," despite its limitations, is a gold mine of  incriminating
information. If you actually read the book you will understand  exactly
why "Islamofascism" is anything but a smear of kind-hearted Muslims.
Rather, Islamofascism is an objectively descriptive term. At the  center
of Islamism is a legacy of blood  --and a legacy of Nazi  inspiration.
 
Mahmoud Amadinejad, who is an overt holocaust denier and Nazi  sympathizer, 
is only the most obvious example of a major part of the reality 
which is contemporary Islam. There are millions of lesser 
Amadinejads thoughout the Islamic world.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to