|
I question the timing. David "Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of
what's good for people than people do is a swine."--P. J. O’Rourke
When thinking of cruel and unusual punishment, weâve
grown accustomed to thinking of torture or similarly brutal
treatment at the hands of police interrogators and/or agents
of the State. But we would do ourselves a service by
broadening our horizons a bit and considering the fact that
a denial of our natural, God-given rights â even apart
from any subsequent physical abuse â is
both cruel and unusual.
Cruel, because it is tantamount to denying us a part of
our humanity, and unusual, because denying someone a part of
their own humanity is not the âusualâ sort of thing we
should be doing.
Yet it remains a fact that every Sunday, when pastors
in America ascend the pulpit, they face the cruel and
unusual prospect of exchanging their natural, God-given
right to free speech for a government-ordained lexicon (if
they want to keep their tax-exempt status).
This is befuddling to say the least.
For no one would suggest a pastor give up his churchâs
tax-exempt status if he wants to keep his constitutional
protection against cruel and unusual punishment or illegal
search and seizure. (Even if they thought it, few would
actually voice the words.) Or imagine how preposterous it
would be for the government to tell a church, âIf you
donât want to quarter troops in your church building,
itâs simple: just give up your tax-exempt status.â Yet
this is precisely what groups like Americans United for
Separation of Church and State ask churches to do when they
tell pastors, âHey, if you want to exercise your First
Amendment right to free speech, just give up your tax-exempt
status.â
Hereâs the problem they hope you wonât see: No
government-recognized status can be conditioned upon the
surrender of a constitutionally protected right. And
thatâs why ADF started Pulpit Freedom Sunday: to get the
government out of the pulpits of America.
It is wrong, both morally and civically, for the
government to tell pastors they can have a tax-exempt status
for their church so long as they donât say anything from
the pulpit which the government doesnât condone. And make
no mistake, those are the parameters the Johnson Amendment
(1954) places on pastors throughout the land.
The Johnson Amendment was created by then-Senator Lyndon
Baines Johnson, who was seeking a way to silence those
opposed to his re-election efforts. The amendment prohibits
non-profit organizations (including churches) from doing
anything to support or oppose a candidate for office.
The enforcement arm for the Johnson Amendment is the IRS.
This means the very agency that oversees tax exempt entities
is given the power to take such status away from churches if
their pastors donât comport with government mandates.
The First Amendment applies to all Americans, even to
pastors. And on October 2, 2011, we encourage pastors around
the country to stand up against governmental overreach and
constitutional infringement, and exercise the
constitutional rights they have always had to talk about
how various political candidates match up with Biblical
principles.
Erik StanleyErik Stanley is senior legal counsel and head of the Alliance Defense Fundâs Pulpit Initiative.__._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual
Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___
-- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org |
Title: ORourke1 Signature
