Associated Baptist Press
 
 
FIRST-PERSON: Where's the outrage  against Iran? 
Kelly Boggs 
Posted on Sep 30, 2011  
ALEXANDRIA, La. (BP) -- Yousef Nadarkhani, a  Christian and a pastor in 
Iran, has been imprisoned since 2009. His crime,  according to Iranian clerics: 
converting to Christianity. His sentence is death  by hanging which could 
be carried out at any time.

The White House has  condemned Iran's plan to execute Nadarkhani and so has 
Speaker of the House John  Boehner. However, conspicuously absent from the 
voices denouncing Iran are  America's rich and famous. News stories about 
Nadarkhani's plight are also few  and far between. 

Just a week ago a cacophony of cries was being lifted  by U.S. celebrities 
denouncing the state of Georgia's planned execution of Troy  Davis, who was 
convicted of murdering a Georgia police officer in August 1991.  

In the two decades since his conviction, Davis' lawyers had attempted  
every appeal available in the American judicial system. In the end, the appeals 
 
process did not result in an overturning of his conviction and Davis was  
executed Sept. 21. 

As Davis' execution date drew near, news stories  appeared in abundance 
offering countless reasons he should not be put to death.  Celebrities like 
Alec Baldwin, Sean "Diddy" Combs, Kim Kardashian and Sandra  Bernhard lent 
their voices to Davis's cause. Filmmaker and author Michael Moore  called for 
an 
economic boycott of Georgia if Davis was executed.

But the  passionate opponents of the death penalty have said very little 
concerning the  plight of Nadarkhani. Additionally, the so-called major media 
outlets have  pretty much ignored the story. 

The contrast between Davis and Nadarkhani  could not be more stark. Davis 
was convicted of murder in the first degree,  which in Georgia can result in 
punishment by death. Nadarkhani has been  convicted of apostasy -- leaving 
Islam -- which under Sharia law mandates  execution. 

Davis was convicted of murdering a police officer and was  given the death 
penalty. He had 20 years' worth of appeals in which to establish  his 
innocence. In the end all Davis' appeals failed and his date for execution  was 
set. 

Nadarkhani, has been sentenced to death because he embraced  Christianity. 
He was repeatedly given the opportunity to recant his beliefs and  have his 
life spared. But he refused and faces execution. 

If one is  opposed to the death penalty in each and every instance, then 
why not protest  Nadarkhani's execution? Where is the nationwide outcry for a 
man being put death  for choosing to convert to a different religion?

Thankfully our founding  fathers understood both the importance and nature 
of faith, especially  Christianity. They understood well that faith could 
not and should not be  coerced or legislated. Hence, the First Amendment of 
the Constitution forbids  the government from making a "law respecting an 
establishment of religion, or  prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

By the time you read this, Yousef  Nadarkhani may well have been executed, 
martyred for his faith in Jesus Christ.  If so, I doubt you will hear much 
about it from the anti-death penalty crowd in  America.

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to