Realistically , Ernie, you need a term or so in the Senate first.
Could be a good career move for you.  :-)
 
BTW, Charlie Rose had a really good retrospective about Steve Jobs,
all kinds of smart people who knew him, plus excerpts from past  interviews
where guests talked about Jobs. What impressed me is how little ( almost  
nothing )
that the computer biz has learned from Apple.
 
With Apple you get ease of operation, ease of learning how to use the  
products,
and ( so they say ) quality content which is easy to access. Compare this  
with
almost anyone else and it is Apple by 10 furlongs. Obvious, but still  
no-one gets it.
 
OK, for selected apps or software, the contest is more-or-less equal, but  
generally.
 
Jobs, so the experts say,  was also a great risk taker  --even if  his 
risks were all
calculated. Thing is, he took risks, seldom "played it safe."   Gotta be 
really sure
of oneself to do that, and know from experience what works and what does  
not.
Then there was how he handled failure, as when he was kicked out of  Apple.
All plusses, some very  big  plusses. + + + + +
 
If it was just the tech-savvy and businessman side of Jobs, well, all the  
plaudits
would be well taken. 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
 
RC candidates for prez ?
 
Give me a little time on this. Worthwhile problem to think about.
 
Billy
 
 
=================================================
 
 
 
 
10/10/2011 2:11:47 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected]  
writes:

Let's  play the hypothetical game, since it is conceivable it could become  
real:


_http://www.americanselect.org/official-documents_ 
(http://www.americanselect.org/official-documents)    


Say the Occupy Wall Street group turns into a Tea Party of the Left,  
complete with its own Sarah Palin-esque leaders.


Say that AmericansElect gets critical mass, and manages to avoid terminal  
dysfunction.


Say that centrists get energized and mobilized to find a way to pull this  
all together.


What then?


The more I think about it, the more I suspect we actually need a "person"  
not a position paper.  An individual who is ideologically pragmatic and  
ruthlessly competent.  Who has the managerial skills and political  temperament 
to be President, but didn't have the stomach for a traditional  nomination 
process.


If we can find that person now, before the media circus, perhaps we can  
help influence him (or her) to take the stage. Even Draft them if  necessary.


But who?   Billy, you're the researcher:  who's smart and  centrist enough 
to theoretically rally both sides of the populist vote?


-- Ernie P.


P.S. And no, before you ask, I'm not available until my daughter turns  
three (she turns one next month). 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community  
<[email protected]>
Google Group: _http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism) 
Radical  Centrism website and blog: _http://RadicalCentrism.org_ 
(http://radicalcentrism.org/) 



-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to