Title: ORourke1 Signature
This looks like the 2010 election results. The dark red is where the Republicans held on to their House seats, and the light red is where they took a House seat from the Democratic party. I would think that your potential RC swing districts would be the light red, not the dark red.

David

"Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine."--P. J. O’Rourke

On 10/16/2011 2:25 PM, [email protected] wrote:
 
Ernie :
The map shows where independent voters are concentrated.
This hardly makes them all Radical Centrists, of course.
But if we were launching an ad campaign and needed to
carefully budget resources, the purple areas would be the
most logical places to spend $$$. Solid red or solid blue
and probably very little bang for the buck.
 
Interesting that a large swath of Texas is in the "potential RC"  category
along with much of the Rocky Mountains ( including Montana )
and most of Louisiana, Kentucky, Ohio, and Missouri.
Also looks like Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma.
 
I'm kind of surprised by Oklahoma, but this is what the map says.
Looks like most of the Cherokee, Choctaw, etc, are Democrats.
 
Of course this is the 2008 election. A current map might
show some very different distribution patterns.
 
Geographically, in terms of area, a lot of Florida is independent,
but look closely and metro Miami is deep blue.
 
California, away from the Coast, is also independent.
However, "independent" may simply mean  --depends on the area--
a fairly even split between Dems and Reps. Regardless, split areas
is where you'd expect a lot of Indies.
 
Billy
 
 
 
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to