Title: ORourke1 Signature
I was not pleased with all of the questions either. I see a difference between legal and illegal that is not seen in the questionnaire.

I also believe that it is possible to be poor and satisfied with their financial situation. A lot depends on location, location, location. Turns out that to be libertarian with these questions, one has to be in favor of Homosexuality.

David

"Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine."--P. J. O’Rourke

On 10/16/2011 7:37 PM, [email protected] wrote:
 
After reading the description  at CAIVA my thought was maybe
that is how I'd be defined, too.  But there were several questions
which I simply could not answer in a PoMod  direction. This leads to
the issue about what questions to ask, or how to word them.
Regardless, a worthwhile test, useful. in some ways anyhow.
 
Billy
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
10/16/2011 2:41:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
Direct Link:
http://www.people-press.org/typology/quiz/

I'm post-modern.

On Oct 16, 4:19 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> If you go to the site   --at least the "page" that features this  article--
> there is a test to determine whether you are an Independent and,
> if so, what kind. I am a "Disaffected"  --along with 11 % of all  Americans.
>
> Maybe "disaffected" in the CAIVA sense = Radical Centrist
>
> Billy
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
>
> CAlifornia Independent Voter Network
>
> Pew survey analyzes Independent, Democratic, and  Republican voter trends
> By Christopher A. Guzman
> Created 2011-07-29 02:31
>
> As partisan gridlock intensifies, the Pew Research Center's constant  
> monitoring of Independent voters continues to reveal the building momentum of  
> the non-partisan movement.  
> In a recent _Pew survey_
> (http://pewresearch.org/pubs/2067/2012-electorate-partisan-affiliation...)  [3] primarily focused on  the
> GOP courting white voters who voted overwhelmingly for President Obama, a  
> game-changing phenomenon emerged. Since 1990, the Independent movement has  
> steadily grown and now commands about the same percentage of support as  
> Democrats.
> Most recently, in what may be reflective of Independents' outlook of  
> President Obama's leadership, Pew says that Democrats now hold a much narrower  
> edge with this particular demograpic (whites) than they did in 2008. Although
>  the GOP has made huge gains with white voters, going from a two point edge
> in  2008 to a thirteen point lead today, the Center's research largely
> credits  Independents for being behind the current drop in Democratic support.
> Overall, partisan affiliation with the Democratic party has fallen from a  
> quarter century high in 2008. From 1990 to 2011, Independents have grown  
> steadily from 28% to 34%. This outpaces the percentage of Republicans, whose  
> current identification of voters matches the 28% that Independents had a few
>  times in the past eleven years.  
> Even though more Independents lean Republican now compared to 2008, going  
> from 11%- 16%, the Democrats' fall from grace doesn't automatically
> translate  into votes for the Republican Party. Pew gives two reasons for this.
> First,  while the 2010 midterms may have been good for Republicans, the gains
> that they  made that year haven't continued as the overall balance of partisan
> attachments  has held steady for the first half of 2011. Second, even
> though many  Independents may lean toward Republicans, registration in the party
> has remained  relatively stagnant.  Combining Independents who lean right or
> left with  partisans, Democrats only have a four point advantage over
> Republicans in the  Pew Center's calculations.
> While Democrats have done very well among minorities, especially with Black
>  voters, Barack Obama and the Democrats also face a big challenge in
> courting  Hispanics. A _recent poll_
> (http://www.caivn.org/article/2011/07/22/young-hispanics-could-become-...)  [4] conducted by Generation  
> Opportunity indicated that strong majorities of young Hispanics are uneasy
> about  levying taxes on individuals and small businesses to get the federal
> budget  under control. Instead, they favor spending cuts.
> Yet, this doesn't automatically translate into votes for the GOP. But, if  
> these young Hispanic voters stay home, this does translate into more of an  
> advantage for Republicans given the resurgence of whites that now support
> them.  With more whites supporting the GOP now than in 2008, Republicans hold
> a  52%-39% advantage over their Democratic colleagues.
> Besides Independents, the youth vote will also be a factor to watch in
> 2012.  While the youth are predominately Democrats or lean that way by 52%-39%,
> that is  a much smaller margin compared to 2008.  The changes in party  
> identification over time are based on compiling 223 surveys and 300,000  
> interviews among registered voters by the Pew Research Center from January 1990  to
> June 2011.

--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
 
--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to