In Colorado, voter anger clouds 2012 choices
By _Dan Balz_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/dan-balz/2011/02/04/AB4ninE_page.html) , 
Published: October 22
DENVER 
By almost every electoral scenario, the road to the White House in 2012 
will  run directly through Colorado and a handful of other Rocky Mountain 
states.  Right now, neither President Obama, who will visit here early this 
week, 
nor the  Republicans who _debated  in Las Vegas_ 
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republican-presidential-debate-puts-herman-cain-to-test/2011/10
/18/gIQAEMJqvL_story.html)  last week should feel confident about their 
prospects in this  pivotal region. 
That conclusion comes from a recent day spent interviewing voters and some  
non-voters in suburban Arapahoe County just east of Denver. Those 
conversations  highlighted three current realities ahead of the coming 
presidential 
race. 
First, voters of all stripes are more disgusted with what they see and hear 
 from Washington than they have been in a long time. Second, the president’
s  performance has been a disappointment even to many of his 2008 
supporters, and  some doubt that he will be reelected. Third, no one in the 
Republican 
field has  captured anyone’s imagination. Republicans are far from making a 
sale. 
Anger with politics in Washington is palpable, erupting with great force 
when  people are asked about the state of the nation or recent efforts to deal 
with  the country’s problems. People see and feel an economy that is still 
inflicting  pain on them or their families or their friends three years 
after the collapse  in 2008. In the face of those problems, they see only 
bickering and gridlock in  Washington, not leadership. 
“The Democrats go down one road and the Republicans go down another, and  
those roads don’t meet,” said John Elam, a retired pharmacist. Without 
missing a  beat, his wife, Evelyn, a retired teacher, jumped in to say, “And if 
there’s a  bridge between them, they’ll burn it.” 
“The situation in Washington is so bad because they won’t do anything to 
fix  it,” said Mike Albi, a retired electrician, referring to the 
politicians. “They  won’t get away from politics and do their job. People are 
angry 
and frustrated  and have no focal point. . . . You think the Arab Spring can’
t  happen here? Think again. You push people far enough and they’ll revolt.”
 
Tom Brown, who leads tour groups abroad, pointed to the Occupy Wall Street  
protests that have sprung up in many cities. “It’s kind of like a volcanic 
 gurgle,” he said. “The mountain hasn’t exploded, but it’s rumbling.” 
The day before last week’s Republican debate in Las Vegas, _Project New 
West_ (http://projectnewwest.com/) , a Democratic group, held  a conference 
that included a panel of Western strategists. They were  surprisingly 
optimistic about Obama’s prospects for winning the Rocky Mountain  region next 
year —
 especially given the comments from voters I spoke with a few  days 
earlier. 
Obama brought the 2008 convention to Denver to stake a claim in the West, 
and  it worked. He won Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada, three states that had 
gone  Republican in 2004, on his way to victory. Today, however, much of 
the  enthusiasm he generated in the region has largely disappeared. 
The Elams both voted for Obama in 2008, although John was a more reluctant  
supporter than was Evelyn. They believe no president in modern times has 
faced  more crises than Obama and are sympathetic to him because of that. But 
when  asked about the president’s prospects next year, Evelyn said, “I don’
t think he  will be reelected . . . because everybody blames him for all 
the  problems.” John Elam said, “Whether he deserves it or not, he probably 
won’t be  reelected.” 
Randy Brooks, who is in the wholesale furniture business, also voted for 
the  president. “The way things have gone, something isn’t there” with Obama’
s  leadership, he said. Does he think Obama deserves a second term? “I’m 
not sure  he does,” Brooks said. 
Heidi Roth-Aguinis, a psychotherapist from Indiana who was visiting the  
Denver area, voted for Obama, but today, she says, she is “very disappointed” 
in  him. She sees the country in a bad position and doesn’t know “if we’re 
going to  get out of it.”  
She has soured on the president because she doesn’t think he knows how to  
lead. She sees Republicans as constantly putting obstacles in Obama’s path 
but  believes a strong, effective leader should find ways to overcome them. “
I don’t  think he knows how to use that leadership, and I don’t think he 
knows how to  bring people together,” she said.  
Obama still has many strong supporters who think he has tried hard to solve 
 problems, and they blame Republicans for obstructionism. Sharon Logan, who 
was  in the telecommunications industry, voted for Obama, and while she has 
some  disappointments, she believes that he is “doing the best job he can 
do.” On the  economy, she said, “I think his grasp of it is as good as 
anybody’s. It’s just  going to take a long time.” 
All in all, Obama will have to work harder to win these states in 2012. 
If the president’s weaknesses are apparent, the Republicans have done 
little  to capi­tal­ize on them. The party’s candidates have debated 
eight times  already this year but have made little impression on the public. 
The Las Vegas debate produced more harsh exchanges than illumination. No 
one  has put forth a proposal to resolve the foreclosure crisis, which has 
left  Nevada with the _highest  unemployment_ 
(http://bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm)  rate in the country, at 13.4 
percent. 
Sharon Logan’s husband, Tom, is a Republican who right now sees “a circus” 
in  the race for his party’s nomination. He liked Mike Huckabee, the former 
Arkansas  governor. “I thought he was more of a people person,” he said. 
But Huckabee  decided not to run. 
Logan is intrigued by businessman Herman Cain but not committed. Former  
Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, the nominal GOP front-runner, hasn’t  
impressed him. “I think Romney tells people whatever they want to hear,” he  
added. 
Bruce Drinkwalter, a former UPS employee, sees Obama as a weak leader, but  
when asked whether he sees a Republican on the horizon who can lead the 
country  effectively, he paused. “That is a really hard question,” he said. 
Like some  others, he is looking at Cain and has questions about Romney. “I 
think it would  be politics as usual with him,” he said of Romney. 
Others see Romney as having the kind of experience the country needs. 
Michael  Tapp, who works for a major bank, thinks there are several candidates 
in 
the  Republican field who have potential, Romney, Cain and Texas Gov. Rick 
Perry  among them. 
Tapp’s wife, Elizabeth, a homemaker who operates a small business, isn’t  
sure. “I would love to see somebody emerge, but it’s not likely,” she said. 
 “That is one of the problems of the Republican Party. There is no one who 
is a  strong leader who can gain support and bring things back together.” 
Democrats count on making the election a choice between a president who has 
 lost some of his luster and a Republican whom they will try to paint as 
deeply  flawed. Republicans hope that dissatisfaction with Obama is so deep 
that voters  will turn to them regardless. In this state, the voters sound 
more discerning.  They are looking for answers and so far aren’t finding many. 

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to