POLITICO
       
Time slipping for Obama  Israel trip
By:  Carrie Budoff  Brown
October 31,  2011 11:32 PM EDT    
Former President George W. Bush waited  until his eighth year in office to 
touch down in Israel. His father,  George H.W. Bush, didn’t go at all. 
Neither did Ronald Reagan. 
But for President Barack Obama, the  call of Israel has always been more 
urgent. 
Jewish leaders have been pressing Obama  since he took office to carve out 
time for Israel, arguing that a trip is  needed to repair missteps in the 
relationship with the key U.S. ally. But  the window — and the expectations — 
for a visit are quickly diminishing,  leaving a potential missed 
opportunity for a president who has been dogged  by questions about his 
commitment to 
Israel. 
“It is an error,” said former New York  Mayor Ed Koch, who made peace with 
Obama in September after being sharply  critical of his record on Israel 
and agreed to support his reelection. “If  he didn’t go this year and he didn’
t go next year, it would result in an  even greater reduction in Jewish 
support.” 
Complaints about Obama stem from the  perception that he has been too tough 
on Israel in his pursuit of Middle  East peace — concerns that peaked last 
spring when the president gave a  speech calling on Israel to embrace the 
country’s pre-1967 borders, with  “land swaps” as a basis for peace talks. 
Although that approach was what  American negotiators had contemplated for an 
eventual agreement, the stark  language on borders at the outset of 
negotiations prompted Republicans to  accuse Obama of abandoning Israel and 
drew 
criticism from some Democrats,  as well. 
The White House gave “serious  consideration” to a summer trip to Israel, 
said former Rep. Robert Wexler  (D-Fla.), a lead liaison for the Obama 
campaign with the Jewish  community. 
But domestic distractions piled up, and  there are no longer any plans in 
the works, at least at this point. Obama  travels to France, about a 
five-hour flight from Israel, for the opening  of a conference Thursday of the 
world’
s largest economies. And next week,  he leaves on a nine-day trip to 
Hawaii, Indonesia and Australia. The  winter holiday season is typically 
off-limits for foreign  travel. 
If Obama doesn’t go next year, he would  break with the precedent set by 
his two most recent Democratic  predecessors, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, 
both of whom made the trip  during their first term. 
The White House wants to reserve a trip  for a time when the president can 
advance the peace process, according to  people familiar with administration 
thinking, but there is no immediate  prospect of a breakthrough. And once 
the calendar ticks over to 2012, a  presidential trip to Israel could be 
viewed as an overtly political  exercise, further dampening the likelihood of a 
trip. 
Still, the political lure may be hard  to resist heading into a tough 
reelection fight in which Republicans  intend to stoke doubts about Obama’s 
record on Israel, which he last  visited in 2008 as a presidential candidate. 
“For other presidents it might have  been a less glaring omission than for 
a president who chose to make these  issues a centerpiece of his foreign 
policy and has had such a difficult  time showing that his ‘unique approach’ 
has succeeded at all, if not set  back the prospects for peace,” said Joshua 
Block, senior fellow at the  Progressive Policy Institute and a former 
spokesman for the American  Israel Public Affairs Committee. “In many ways, he 
is 
in a greater need of  going to Israel.” 
At a June fundraiser with Jewish  supporters, Obama faced pressure on this 
very question. 
A donor asked the president whether he  realized that he needed to go to 
Israel “now” or at least in his first  term, according to a source familiar 
with the event. Obama responded that  he would visit the country, but the 
time had to be right and he didn’t  want to go purely for a political benefit, 
the source said. 
J Street, a liberal Jewish group,  launched a petition last spring urging 
Obama “to go to Jerusalem” and  detail his plan for achieving a two-state 
solution for Israeli-Palestinian  peace. 
“It’s time for a presidential visit to  Israel,” the petition stated. 
Rep. Steve Rothman (D-N.J.) pressed the  president several months ago, 
following up on a request that he and other  Democratic lawmakers made last 
year.

“I got a big smile,” Rothman  said of Obama’s response. “I don’t think 
the president gets enough credit  for all that he has done for Israel.”

Wexler, an early Obama backer  and president of the S. Daniel Abraham 
Center for Middle East Peace, said  he fielded the question frequently — until 
about two months  ago.

“The focus was, ‘Where does the president stand on Israel?’  and to the 
extent that there were questions, the trip to Israel was a part  of that 
narrative,” Wexler said in an interview. “But that narrative has  been answered 
in the strongest of terms.”

First, Obama took a  personal role in ensuring that Israeli diplomats 
caught in an early  September siege of the country’s embassy in Cairo were 
brought to safety.  Then, later that month, Obama delivered a speech at the 
United 
Nations  strongly condemning the Palestinian Authority’s quest for 
statehood  through a U.N. resolution. After that, Newsweek revealed that Obama 
had  
secretly agreed in 2009 to sell 55 bunker-busting bombs to Israel, making  
good on a request first pursued during the George W. Bush  administration.

“Those three items are so powerful in terms of the  impressions made in the 
American-Jewish community that a trip to Israel  would be gravy,” Wexler 
said.

An administration official said not  visiting Israel in the first term “isn’
t unusual,” but “that doesn’t  change the fact that the bilateral 
relationship is very strong.” The  official cited the president’s numerous 
one-on-one meetings with Israeli  Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Obama’s 
support in ensuring Israel’s  security, including $205 million in aid for a 
short-range missile defense  system known as Iron Dome.

His popularity in Israel does appear on  the rise. A May survey of Israeli 
Jews found only 12 percent thought U.S.  policy was pro-Israel and 40 
percent viewed it as pro-Palestinian. A  survey taken after the U.N. speech 
showed 
that 54 percent thought Obama’s  policy was favorable to Israel and 19 
percent said it was pro-Palestinian.  The Jerusalem Post commissioned both 
polls, but they were conducted by  different firms with different 
methodologies, 
making direct comparisons  difficult.

In America, Obama’s support among Jews has declined over  the past three 
years, mirroring his drop in support among all voters,  according to the 
Gallup Poll. He won 78 percent of the Jewish vote in  2008, and although he is 
expected to win a majority again next year, some  worry he won’t perform quite 
as well.

A group of Obama’s closest  Jewish supporters — including Wexler, senior 
campaign strategist David  Axelrod and Democratic National Committee 
Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman  Schultz — launched an offensive earlier this year 
to 
counter Republicans  such as presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, who said Obama “
threw Israel  under the bus.”

“Much of the narrative that was out there was  trumped up by Republicans,” 
Wasserman Schultz said. “I reject the notion  that there was widespread 
concern other than it was from Republicans who  cared more about partisanship 
than Israel. … Presidents go to Israel at  some point in their presidency. 
The president will be no  exception.”

David Harris, executive director of the American Jewish  Committee, said 
Obama’s trips earlier in his presidency to Egypt, Turkey  and Saudi Arabia “
only make Israelis want the visit more.” But now Obama  should wait until he 
can advance the peace process, Harris  said.

Block disagrees, saying there are many reasons to visit  Israel, even if it’
s simply to show support for a key ally in a volatile  region. Obama has 
moved the relationship in a positive direction in recent  weeks, and a visit 
would only reinforce the trend, Block said.

“If  he doesn’t do it,” Block said, “he is missing an opportunity to 
underscore  that our relationship with Israel goes well beyond simple questions 
of the  peace process, and it leaves him open to criticism that he didn’t  
go.”

-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

Reply via email to