Mike : If I may ask, did you actually read more than a paragraph or two of the paper ? Reason for the question is that your "response" misses the point entirely. You usually are very perceptive and do actual research. But about this matter, anyone could have said what you just did, without benefit of any research or serious thought. While lengthy and maybe more time than you wanted to give the subject ( my mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts ? ), the paper is a major research project into which I put a lot of time and critical thinking. Yet in the end, a blow-off comment. Not what I would have expected. My observation. Billy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11/25/2011 7:43:18 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes:
I'm generally pretty supportive of gay marriage, but I agree that "homophobia" does not describe a religious or ideological aversion to homosexuality, when it doesn't lead to seizing terror. -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
